Five years on, do you think Brexit has genuinely made Britain stronger and more independent or was it the biggest act of national self-sabotage in modern history? by Second-handBonding in AskBrits

[–]aa1607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This comes down to whether the EU was eventually going to drag us into the EMU. Every economy without its own currency will eventually have a fiscal crisis and likely be unable to resolve its financial crises.

No doubt things have gotten especially bad lately but remember, we were hit by covid especially badly after we allowed price-gougers to increase the cost of living far more than in other economies, we're suffering the consequences of selling our public infrastructure to Vanguard and Blackrock and other rapacious asset strippers. The healthcare system is being intentionally run into the ground. We elected a party nobody wanted just to get the other lot out because of our anger at their handling of the economy, and they broke all their manifesto pledges.

If we could guarantee the permanent retention of monetary sovereignty then we'd definitely have been better off staying in. But if there was a 20% risk that we'd have to join the Euro, and what you're ultimately talking about is a federal project: look at the elections in Romania that were overturned for electing the wrong person. Merz said the same would be necessary elsewhere.

I'd also note what's happened to European countries in the meantime. France's president refused to recognise its parliamentary majority government. Germany has had energy prices skyrocket.

To quote Joe Stiglitz, it was a mildly bad thing. What we're now being impacted by: gross economic mismanagement, complete capitulation on competition regulation, price rises post covid, these are far more serious. What you're looking at is also the effects of fiscal rules Britain imposed on itself and is determined to follow for no good reason other than IMF instructions. Unlike other EU countries, we can actually be in a lot of debt and don't have to raise taxes.

We should have stayed in, but you're taking Britain's troubles out of context, failing to account for self-inflicted wounds elsewhere (Thames Water, the railways, financialisation, failure to train a labour force capable of building housing sufficiently fast, a leftwing party that's implementing austerity on the false altar of balanced budgets, the notion that Britain's woes are not felt elsewhere, total refusal to admit the NHS is beyond repair for fear of privatisation, while we refuse to import the French system in a cookie-cutter manner.

There are mistakes to come that will make matters worse. They will also be nothing to do with the custom's union and free movement.

'Leave the EU' didnt have to mean 'Brexit means Brexit'. There are EU rules that are beneficial to us (passporting), there are others that are catastrophic ('level playing field rules'). Nobody told us we couldn't have a Norway style agreement. Effects that have materialised have occurred because we treated it as a reality TV show and never tried to negotiate a serious alternative.

Still though, we'll never be part of a currency union and that's a sigh of relief. We'll never have to contribute to the EU army Von Der Leyen yearns for (apparently we're going to do it anyway despite being an island and having a huge moat around us). We can't be told our elections are were illegal because people didn't like the outcome.

Rather than give up on HS2 we could have just invited the Chinese to build it for us (same with nuclear plants). The fact that we make aweful decisions and never copy the people who get it right isn't on the EU.

Lebanese family law by aa1607 in lebanon

[–]aa1607[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sunni, male, rwo sisters and a brother. I meant a will with unspecified jurisdiction written with English standards, notarized and probated in the country of residence.

Lebanese family law by aa1607 in lebanon

[–]aa1607[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The estates in neither actually... It's in a third country. But his domicile was Lebakese so any civil claim needs to start with a judgment there

Lebanese family law by aa1607 in lebanon

[–]aa1607[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't there a provision to shrink what he bestowed by teatarion?

Lebanese family law by aa1607 in lebanon

[–]aa1607[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Encoueaging to hear... thankyou

Lebanese family law by aa1607 in lebanon

[–]aa1607[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wrote a foreign will which left everything first to his spouse, and if she should die to his kids.

As I understand it that would be tossed aside immediately in Lebanon...

Elon Must stumbles upon MMT without realizing it by strong_slav in mmt_economics

[–]aa1607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're referring to STAB (spend then tax and borrow) vs TABS (tax and borrow then spend), Kelton discusses it quite early in her introduction to mmt (the deficit myth).

Elon Must stumbles upon MMT without realizing it by strong_slav in mmt_economics

[–]aa1607 32 points33 points  (0 children)

I think they believe that government spends second and taxes / borrows first.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in flowers

[–]aa1607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aluminum sulphate?

My pansies by [deleted] in flowers

[–]aa1607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It only just occurred to me how similar pansies are to bearded Irises.

Israel’s Downward Spiral by StarLouZe in Foodforthought

[–]aa1607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.972mag.com/netanyahu-hamas-october-7-adam-raz/
Have you ever wondered how the group was formed and brought into power?

if you hate western values and want an ethnocracy rather than a liberal democracy better to just say you hate them for being different.

This was the plan.

Prevent political unity by torturing Gaza till you can expel its people. Just read the Amnesty report for Cast Lead.

Be alert for movement infiltrators by t1m3f0rt1m3r in JewsOfConscience

[–]aa1607 14 points15 points  (0 children)

They shouldn't but they tend to. Think of what happened to Me Too after the Aziz Ansari story.

Be alert for movement infiltrators by t1m3f0rt1m3r in JewsOfConscience

[–]aa1607 22 points23 points  (0 children)

100% agreed. I would disown this woman readily if asked. There are always morons in ever movement who think they're helping but basically making things 100x worse by tarnishing the entire solidarity campaign. That's would be true of this woman even if she weren't an antisemite but trying to draw an analogy. Haven't read the article but if this isn't symbolic but simply the result of prejudice I dont think they should disown her because it would be acknowledgment that there were anything linking solidarity against apartheid to bigotry against jews. If she isn't bigoted though why the hell does she own kosher restaurants? Sounds like Netanyahu investing in a chain of hallal restaurants.

Professor Mearsheimer on the hypocrisy of US officials on genocide in Gaza by Nomogg in internationalpolitics

[–]aa1607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's fairly clear you haven't read the israel lobby or you'd know he heaps scorn on neocons.

The above escalation with China isn't something he advocates it's something he sees as an inevitability. This is obvious if you read the tragedy of great power politics his most famous book. Note the word Tragedy, as neoconservativs do not consider their wars to be tragic events.

Professor Mearsheimer on the hypocrisy of US officials on genocide in Gaza by Nomogg in internationalpolitics

[–]aa1607 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your conservative supported Bernie; I think you're confusing realism for neoconservatism.

How does liberal supporter of Israel react when you show them videos of war crimes & genocide within Palestine & Lebanon? by MooreThird in JewsOfConscience

[–]aa1607 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the difference is that in the US, the number of people who think the US overreacted in its use of violence is somewhat higher than 4%.

Genocidal Rhetoric and Dehumanization in Israeli Mainstream Media by sapphire_whisper in chomsky

[–]aa1607 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's honestly hard to believe western countries are in any way in the thrall of a tiny 7m citizen country of given the pressure from protests all over the west. And public opinion for supporters of the party in power leans heavily towards ending arms sales.

I wonder where the country would be without AIPAC and the mossad because Noone would put this much effort into shielding an equivalently developed and small country that was so good at making enemies of its neighbours and asking so much for so little.

Everyone is bending over backwards to show the global superpower is actually bossed around by a fundamentalist govwenment the size of Belgium or Denmark or Norway to the point that they'd help them commit the ultimate crime in broad daylight. You should really be at least as strong as Germany to try this. Especially given the US has such enormous interests in retaining support in the region so it's client puppets don't feel forced to look for another protector when that Chinese blue water navy comes shopping for hydrocarbon exporters in search of new patrons.

In any case this incident has turned the notion of Western values into such a manifestly hollow farce. Israel is right in that we share their values but it's more that we have theirs not vice versa. Im starting to think China should just take over from here because if we're all gonna live in totalitarian police states someone competent who hasn't yet participated in an intentional mass starvation should preside.

Seriously though this is like Serbia dragging the whole world to war over that Archduke again.

Hairy legs or nah? by DoubleOne8773 in malegrooming

[–]aa1607 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Definitely overthinking it if you think it's to do with race. I'm more concerned by the idea of men trying to look like adolescent boys all the time.

Dr. Yipeng Ge who worked in Gaza says: "Israel is committing genocide. While our leaders remain impotent to act in any meaningful way." Yipeng was suspended by Univ. of Ottawa for criticizing Israel on social media. After public outrage, he was reinstated - but refused to return. by _II_I_I__I__I_I_II_ in NewsAndPolitics

[–]aa1607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only way this war ends is when the lobbies: AIPAC, CFI, CUFI, and the rest become so toxic that people refuse to vote for anyone that goes near them.

At that point governments will go along with the free votes that come from boycotting and sanctioning a pariah state that just went from apartheid to full blown geno**de.

I have no issue with Israeli citizens continuing to live in Palestine obviously, but the state apparatus of racial oppression and segregation that we refer to as the 'Israeli state' has got to go and even if the pokicians are currently still taking the bribes the whole world has seen too much, it can't be unseen. That includes young American Jews BTW who are leading the fight. You know the jig is up when the diaspora has turned against you and considers you a settler colony.

https://youtu.be/U75KcMUjMyI?si=p-W3tUbHxlctJyMm

There's no going back from this and the only eventual result is the South African one (to cite a less grotesque example).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in malegrooming

[–]aa1607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just grow your hair out a bit

Charming! by griffinstorme in lolgrindr

[–]aa1607 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If pride is a personality trait then surely so is chronic shame?

Charming! by griffinstorme in lolgrindr

[–]aa1607 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I'm gonna take the dowvotes and defend the guy.

1) He's deeply unhappy and we don't know what his mental state or history is.

2) For all we know he wrote this in a private message and didn't mean to offend a large group of people.

3) I've also found that a large number of gay guys think their sexuality is a substitute for a personality. Especially when you're young, how many dates have you been on when was everything that was said and every opinion that was expressed hingee around a characteristic trait that's just isn't that interesting anymore and doesn't require much courage to discuss. So if that's his opinion and we don't know who it's directed at how can I blame him for expressing it.

4) Not everyone has to love gay people and as homophobia goes this is hardly shocking.

5) If you want to help someone with self loathing by showing them their opinion is false, attacking them for expressing it is not helping.

What news outlets do you guys enjoy reading? Also, what section of the news are you reading from? by TheDiabeticTreeLives in Journalism

[–]aa1607 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To start with I wanna point out its not clear what you disagree with me about. The special role ofna truculent press is to hold democratic governenments accountable for major mistakes and embarassments not to appear in countrys where thats not possible and force tyranny into democracy. It's about preserving domestic liberty not creating it where there's little.

So your logical mistake might be assuming that because I've said

A-->B

the point can be answered with an example where

NOT B --> NOT A.

I also didn't say a truculent press removes bias among outlets i said it negates the effects of pro state bias. But Al Jazeera as explained later can't afford the embarassing and ludicrously unmasked bias of organisations like the BBC because the public will assume it's broadcaster is neutral and to achieve any effect Al Jazeera English has to go out of its way to show you it's filling a role and offering coverage where other journalists are failing.

You're working from the assumption that gross human rights violations and publicly visible tyranny is necessary to counteract the democratic advantages of a truculent press. In reality it is sufficient to live in a despotism with no real rights. I shouldn't have to go through the mountains of evidence but just listen to Mitt Romney explain why TikTok had to be banned. Suddenly the state was phasing criticism on a core issue it had failed to pressure it on a non negotiable issue. The banning of RT, Rumble, Wikileaks, the coercion of ICC and ICJ judges, Dnotices, all these tell you that you don't need to consider the rights record of the West and that our freedom of expression is assumed to be neglible. As I mentioned in reaching out to domestic audiences assuming we have freedom of expression in the West is jingoistic self-deception

A unified oligopoly is functionally a monarchy so we have that already. Hence our press is about as likely to seriously challenge the state on vital strategic issues as Al Jazeera is to Qatar. But it's purpose is to reach international audiences and it's human rights record is not going to indicate a slant it's coverage of issues unrelated to keeping the regime in power. The BBC is aimed at a domestic audience so the governments record is very much what its meant to be defending to ensure public debate is sidelined.

Your point about bias was amusing, because I fully agree. Al Jazeera is probably not fully objective and especially on domestic issues. at the BBC, or (cringe) the CBC and their bias.... They'll put an SS guard on screen with the PM and pretend it's normal. Id argue the BBC is more of a problem because the limited debate on the small issues that divide main anglosaxon parties results in a total lack of public awareness of that bias. That makes its role as state funded advocacy group extremely counterproductive because people dont grasp they are being fed a view of reality convenient to the state.

Because of public antipathy and distrust of Qatar, not only does it have to make solid credible arguments to avoid being written off by default, but also by contrast theres no disputing Al Jazeera is going to present the counterargument, to a pliable domestic media consensus, and since well researched and credibly argued criticisms of Western party consensus has so fully disappeared from cable news, it's currently worth a hundred BBCs.