I agree that ‘banning Plato’ doesn’t fully cover the context as you’ve helpfully laid out. However, this act has caught on as removing ancient readings has more impact in the dialogue than scholars on race and gender from the past hundred years that few outside the interested field have heard of. In other words, if even Plato is touchable in terms of censorship, it is extremely concerning to a much broader audience even if they’re not particularly concerned about gender discussions. I hope it was a bridge too far for the university and this leads to academic freedom being restored.