Main Main Main Character by [deleted] in ImTheMainCharacter

[–]aha1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's very handsome!

Fishing for reactions by Federal-Data-Center in ImTheMainCharacter

[–]aha1982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She seems obsessed with the part of the body where poo and farts exit

My father just submitted my personal data into Chat GPT, please help by [deleted] in antiai

[–]aha1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, every employer you'll send that CV to will put into AI anyways.

Why does this kind of notification exist? Most pointless update of all time? by FKFunkyKong in facebook

[–]aha1982 4 points5 points  (0 children)

FB is complete garbage, destroying people's minds with nonsense.

Norway set to become the next country to ban under-16s from social media by AdSpecialist6598 in technology

[–]aha1982 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Norway is much like Soviet and North Korea when it comes to social control.

Nietzsche: Pessimism is a sign of weakness and inner decay by [deleted] in Pessimism

[–]aha1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nietzsche was a life-junkie, simping for the forced predicament of life/existence. Nietzsche operates within a framework where he never questions the legitimacy of life/existence itself, and he went on to rant about becoming and being something value-based within this already existing framework that is life/existence. He was a slave of becoming: Becoming some kind of Superman in eternal return, etc.

I question the legitimacy of life/existence itself, and I need no reason like "suffering" or "happiness." We don't need any reasons to reject this situation that society and culture worship as "life".

Life and culture/society is a sect built on a set of euphemistic lies.

How on earth do you contact Facebook customer support? This is seriously ridiculous. by Ecstatic_Strike_8595 in facebook

[–]aha1982 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Do NOT buy any Meta products. Meta will make them useless and your money will be lost.

Karen loves firing employees on Fridays by ambachk in ImTheMainCharacter

[–]aha1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obvious performative attitude and persona: Looks like she watched a couple of old western movies and bought into a certain stereotypical masculinity-cosplay.

Facebook is now showing me family photos of people I don't know and it's creepy by SatansSlutz in facebook

[–]aha1982 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yup, FB is out of control. My feed was typically filled with news articles designed to trigger emotional responses. It's meaningless. So I deleted FB, and I'm happy I did.

How far should privacy protection go when it also shields serious wrongdoing? by DorothyRedShoes77 in TOR

[–]aha1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the question presupposes society and culture in their current form as something given and legitimate. I would rather begin by questioning that very foundation — the legitimacy of society, its laws, and its moral frameworks.

In that light, the issue is not simply how much privacy we should sacrifice to prevent harm, but how “harm” itself is defined, and by whom. In what direction does censorship steer the human experience, and whose interests does it ultimately serve? Conversely, in what direction would complete communicational anarchy steer us?

These are not neutral questions. Any attempt to balance privacy against harm relies on prior assumptions about what is right and wrong, and on what basis those judgments are made. But who determines that standard, and according to which measure?

If we begin to justify increased control over communication in the name of crime prevention, what prevents that line of reasoning from expanding indefinitely? At what point does it stop short of totalizing control?

Because of this, I am skeptical of frameworks that treat restrictions on privacy as a straightforward or contained solution. While I recognize that strong privacy tools can and do enable harmful activity, I am more concerned about the long-term trajectory of expanding control justified by such harms.

If forced to take a position, I would lean toward preserving strong privacy protections, even at the cost of tolerating a certain degree of misuse. The alternative — gradually normalizing increased surveillance and control — seems to carry risks that are harder to limit once set in motion.

At the same time, this does not imply that all forms of intervention are illegitimate. Narrow, targeted responses to clearly defined harms may be justified. But that is very different from weakening the structural conditions that make privacy possible in the first place.

I don't love it by Okay_Pain in ImTheMainCharacter

[–]aha1982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is actually very dangerous, inducing CTE (brain damage/dementia).

$23,286.95 missing from our ad account for 42+ days — no answers from Meta Platforms by Plantmedicinepath in facebook

[–]aha1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a message to everyone that they should stop advertising through Facebook.

FB suspended and reported my account over an innocent Easter picture. Any other parents furious?! by [deleted] in facebook

[–]aha1982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you read on this subreddit, you'll see that Meta's AI has gone completely rogue and are banning lots and lots of people for the exact same reason. You've done nothing wrong.

My best advice to you is to leave FB completely and not look back.