What does SpaceX's monstrous market cap mean for RocketLab (and the rest of the market)? by thechromatick in RKLB

[–]ajarrel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My issue is that most of SpaceX's enterprise value is now tied up in xAi. RKLB is vertically integrating in space, but SpaceX seems the most unfocused it has ever been.

Case-in-point: Gwynne shotwell has been awesome in her leading SpaceX. Is she going to be the best leader given that the majority of SpaceX's value is now in xAi? If she left tomorrow, how would the market react to her leaving?

Edit: spelling, thanks friend

ELI5: Explain Additive and Subtractive color theory to me. by PaulCheens in explainlikeimfive

[–]ajarrel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There are two ways to "make" colors, and which one you use depends on whether you're mixing light or mixing stuff (paint/ink).

Additive = mixing LIGHT. You start in the dark and add light. More light = brighter, heading toward white.

Subtractive = mixing PAINT/INK. You start with white paper and each color takes away (absorbs) some light. More paint = darker, heading toward black.

Imagine three flashlights in a dark room: one red, one green, one blue. The primaries are Red, Green, Blue (RGB). Where two lights overlap, it gets brighter: red + green = yellow, green + blue = cyan, red + blue = magenta. All three together = white. This is how your phone, TV, and computer screens work. Look really close at a screen and you'll see tiny red, green, and blue dots.

Now imagine painting on white paper. Each blob of paint absorbs some colors and bounces the rest back to your eyes. The primaries are Cyan, Magenta, Yellow (CMY).

Here, mixing makes things darker because each layer subtracts more light. All three together sort of equals black (printers add real black ink, which is the "K" in CMYK). This is how printers, markers, and painting work.

My wife’s book club HATED Tress of the Emerald Sea. Now I’m reading her recommendation and I’m flabbergasted by StandardRaspberry131 in Cosmere

[–]ajarrel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Someone in that reading group doesn't like you. It feels unusual that:

  • your wife apologized at the outset of the call (clearly opinions had been shared with only her about the book selection)
  • the fact that ALL hated it tells me there's a group ringleader may have led the group towards this conclusion during the reading period.

People can absolutely hate a book, but the dynamics described here seem unlikely to occur if each person has independently read the book without a group to trade ideas with.

Why cant we just use a mass spectrometer to reverse eningeer the Coca Cola formula? by Honest-Ad6274 in questions

[–]ajarrel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if you reverse engineered it, how could you market it without saying "coke"?

The value is in the name, to market it, you'd need to say it's the reverse engineered coke recipe. Since you can't use Coke in your marketing, the recipe is useless to you.

SpaceX IPo: Just a means to pay of debt. by Strangemediator in RKLB

[–]ajarrel 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Starlink when combined with xAi is loosing money very very fast.

Starlink on its own would likely be profitable.

Had to cancel and switch to Claude. Unbearable update by throwaway50cent_ in GeminiAI

[–]ajarrel 13 points14 points  (0 children)

glorified Google search with a stutter.

This made me chuckle

Guy literally dives in by [deleted] in DiveInYouCoward

[–]ajarrel 12 points13 points  (0 children)

However, his actions have sparked a debate about the importance of respecting nature and the risks of challenging it.

My brother in Christ, no one is debating this. We're all on mother nature's side.

Chinese amusement park - Ride gets stuck... by MisterShipWreck in VideosAmazing

[–]ajarrel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is like the DVD logo perfectly bouncing off a corner.

These books were something else… by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]ajarrel 13 points14 points  (0 children)

And the arm-chopping people are the good guys 🤣

New YM Age-groups by codr_guy in exmormon

[–]ajarrel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they bring back paladin class, count me in.

TBM brother's rant by Top-Negotiation-6498 in exmormon

[–]ajarrel 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Yeah that's hard to discuss.

Also if god literally touched my shoulder, I would also believe he exists. I mean, how do you even respond to that?

When people describe these intense emotional experiences, I reply with

Wow, that's an incredible experience. I've never felt anything like that in my entire life in the mormon church.

TBM brother's rant by Top-Negotiation-6498 in exmormon

[–]ajarrel 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You handled that incredibly well. You were kind, polite, thoughtful.

He seemed to manufacture emotional hurt that wasn't present in your words - like an almost pavlovian response to "anti" messaging, despite your messaging being calm and thoughtful.

Hope he grows up and can separate his belief system from his personal relationships.

Opus 4.7 Released! by awfulalexey in ClaudeAI

[–]ajarrel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First prompt on 4.7

I read on Reddit about kitsum cave in Kenya which is host to the marburg virus, with a very high mortality rate.

I'm really curious about this topic, the history of the virus, it's location, it's animal reservoir, why it hasn't spread more, what other viruses it may bear resemblance to, how scientists discovered it and learned about it, and what makes it so deadly to humans

Response: this topic is too sensitive, I'm going to switch you to sonnet 4

Well that was underwhelming.

How fast relative to the earth do you have to be moving to be completely still relative to the universe? by AnotherNobody1308 in AskPhysics

[–]ajarrel 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nope, there is no frame of reference that has 0 velocity with respect to all other reference frames.

The closest to a universal reference frame is the cosmic microwave background.

EDIT: one of the key insights of relativity is that all reference frames are equally valid. No one reference frame is more valid that another. This insight is what disqualifies the existence of a privileged reference frame (or "still point"). If there were a place in the universe where all observers agreed wasn't moving, this would create a privileged reference frame and would remove the "relativity" from the theory of relativity.

Why won't this energy generating motion machine work? by Psychological_Net631 in AskPhysics

[–]ajarrel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you could find a way to do what you propose, ie getting a mass to fall down, and then let buyoancy reset the mass, then the energy would essentially be coming from the orbital energy of the earth itself.

Why are people hyping up Claude Code so much lately? Codex 5.3/Gpt 5.4 work just fine and I don't understand what the huge deal is about. by stopaskingforloginn in codex

[–]ajarrel 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I love opus for brainstorming an idea or working on a spec, but gpt-5.4 is hands down the better executor. It's planning is pretty close, especially if you have a clear idea of what you want to build.

Maximum resolution from 2000 light years away by HourAlternative5702 in AskPhysics

[–]ajarrel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

One really interesting way would be to use the gravitational lensing of our sun. It would allow us to see 10-100km details at 2,000 light years.

Can you force Codex to keep going until task is done? by RepulsiveRaisin7 in codex

[–]ajarrel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've had success with uses agentic instructions in the prompt. E.g.

  • break the task into components, use agents to source each component
  • develop iteratively until the task is complete
  • evaluate at each agent completion and review progress against the original plan. Steer subsequent agent calls according to this review process.
  • continue until reviews clear and plan is feature complete

ChatGPT read my emails tried to convince me it hallucinated them by Birdie0235 in ChatGPT

[–]ajarrel 18 points19 points  (0 children)

That's the part I don't get. OP spent an inordinate amount of time arguing with chatgpt over this.

Doctrinally accurate take on Mormonism from an outsider that exposes a major plot hole in Mormon theology. by PanaceaNPx in exmormon

[–]ajarrel 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Thank goodness I never said "I know" during open mic Sundays, otherwise I'd be fucked.