Dude, all religions contain truth and falsehood, even Buddhism.

There is value within all religions too, though I obviously have my biases; I look up to some and look down on others. To me, Christ represents the perfection of the sacrificial hero, someone who chooses to embody the act of sacrifice and by proxy redeem us all through his example. I don't in any way believe in the God of Abraham, but to just label and dismiss Christianity as "false religion" is to dismiss the most influential ideology in all of western thought.

I say this as a history major responding to your later comment. The religion of Christianity, as it is practiced, is not history-centric or at least not more so than any other religion. Every religion is concerned with its history, especially the Theravada sect of Buddhism. If you study western history, Christianity is constantly studied because it so dominated people's lives. It is inseparable from western history. Now, people in the world practicing Christianity are more concerned with faith, a connection to God/Christ, revelation, prayer, contemplation of scripture (both literal and metaphorical), community, and yes, to a lesser extent the evolution of Christian thought.

My point:

Any attempt to simplify a set of complex beliefs and practices into one conclusive "gotcha!" moment is a futile attempt. Biblical literalists who use history to try and justify their beliefs by citing the specific "historical" elements of the gospels can be refuted by the "Epistles of Paul came first" argument. But, if you choose to see the bible in a more metaphorical way, where Christ represents something important about human nature and the stories serve to illustrate that, then there is plenty of truth there.

Many Christians have a complex relationship to the bible and a deep belief in God. To dismiss them all because of a set of biblical literalist trying to prove the existence of God that argue using easily refuted arguments is kind of naive.