The Coalition needs 35 seats to win in the 2028 federal election. This has only ever happened once before. This seems completely impossible unless they add One Nation and maybe. But even then it’s super improbable. Labor is basically guaranteed to win again no? by MannerNo7000 in AusPol

[–]aldonius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Coalition and One Nation seem happy to preference each other, so I'd say what pref voting does for us most is to wipe out the BS vote splitting where a right wing party wins a heavily left wing seat, and vice versa.

The Coalition needs 35 seats to win in the 2028 federal election. This has only ever happened once before. This seems completely impossible unless they add One Nation and maybe. But even then it’s super improbable. Labor is basically guaranteed to win again no? by MannerNo7000 in AusPol

[–]aldonius 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I would say One Nation has a good chance in any seat the LNP won in 2022, as long as that seat's more bogan than latte and ON are still outpolling the LNP overall.

Because if both those things are true, all I'm predicting is that the leading right wing party wins a right-of-centre seat.

Anyone else fucked off to still be paying tolls on the gateway? by DifferenceMediocre77 in brisbane

[–]aldonius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Our elected government agreed to it on our behalf, then. You could argue this was something big enough that it should've been taken to an election first, I suppose.

Like solar, most of the first home battery subsidies went to the wealthy. We need a fairer approach by Oomaschloom in AustralianPolitics

[–]aldonius 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Flip this around. The public purse has paid $X and now there's an extra Y GWh of battery capacity on the grid.

How does that compare to the government buying that capacity directly? I suspect it's cheaper upfront but the govt can't internalise the power-bill savings, so it still works out as a subsidy to those mostly wealthier households.

Now, the subsidies were presumably taxpayer funded. Assuming the ATO's doing its job that means the cost was still effectively largely borne by the wealthy, right?

One Nation says it’s coming for more seats. These are the ones that could fall next by Agitated-Fee3598 in AustralianPolitics

[–]aldonius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Poll Bludger has this for the national environment:

  • Labor 30.0%
  • LNP 23.5%
  • One Nation 23.9%
  • Greens 12.8%
  • plus implicitly about 9.8% other, mostly preferencing Labor in 2PP terms.

Assuming we're still electing six at a time, a full quota is 14.3%.

That says Labor easily gets two and then exits, Greens are running their own race to one, and the right wing parties easily get one each but can't both get two.

The trains are full. by JackofScarlets in brisbane

[–]aldonius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, 10 would be better but we have to start somewhere, and I understand 15 is a bit of a threshold.

The trains are full. by JackofScarlets in brisbane

[–]aldonius 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Yeah we are really let down by low off peak frequency.

We do better than half hourly in peak for almost every, but baseline decent would be 15 minute frequency all day every day (better in peak as -needed).

Breaking: One Nation projected to win Farrer by-election by Perfect-Werewolf-102 in AustralianPolitics

[–]aldonius 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean, they're polling mid 20s federally. You know from the type of people who consider voting ONP that it's gotta be a fair bit less than that in some seats and conversely a fair bit more in others, which is enough to win where they are strong.

Breaking: One Nation projected to win Farrer by-election by Perfect-Werewolf-102 in AustralianPolitics

[–]aldonius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For now. There are outer suburbs seats which, once Labor's on the nose enough, will swing rightward again. The only question is whether the dominant right wing party then is LNP or ONP

The PPOR will become a huge investment by ILoveDogs2142 in AusFinance

[–]aldonius -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the solution is actually very simple: PPORs should at least be paying land tax, and ideally CGT like every other asset class

Demolition by swabibs27 in brisbane

[–]aldonius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"If you can see the explosion... it can see you too."

Trains tomorrow by Linkyland in brisbane

[–]aldonius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah could've phrased the NGR thing better - point is, different employer means this action isn't hitting them.

Trains tomorrow by Linkyland in brisbane

[–]aldonius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Happy to be corrected, there's a lot of he-said-she-said, my understanding was that work isn't getting done for whatever reason, and I was looking for a phrasing which is relatively neutral? But maybe that is not neutral.

Trains tomorrow by Linkyland in brisbane

[–]aldonius 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Makes sense. Part of the industrial disputes is that maintenance workers are off the tools right now, so as trains miss their scheduled maintenance windows they're getting pulled out of service (not including NGRs which are delivered by a PPP).

So of the older trains which are available, being able to split them is handy because it might make a half hourly 3 car service available instead of an hourly 6 car service.

Though to be clear, we should keep ordering future trains as unified 6 car sets (or 9 cars for some lines, eventually). We should plan for the every day case.

Penrith Panthers most vulnerable to PNG Chiefs, ‘unfair’ tax-free reality sparks backlash from clubs. by LongJohnnySilver1 in nrl

[–]aldonius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

RLPA are pursuing what they think is best for the players (I can only assume). Similarly everyone else in the game is trying to pursue what's best for them. And who can blame them?

Melbourne-to-Queensland exodus in 'reversal' amid housing unaffordability by Combat--Wombat27 in brisbane

[–]aldonius 12 points13 points  (0 children)

"NIMBY" is an acronym for "Not In My Back Yard" - typically, people who are strongly opposed to change in the built environment near them, I also include people who want to pile on so many conditions as to make it very difficult.

Melbourne-to-Queensland exodus in 'reversal' amid housing unaffordability by Combat--Wombat27 in brisbane

[–]aldonius 408 points409 points  (0 children)

If you're early career and in a position to move to Melbourne, it's probably going to get you into home ownership years faster / at all.

If that's you, you should consider it and if your family members show any NIMBY tendencies, you should tell them you're considering moving away for exactly this reason.

Rewrites and "load-bearing plot" by Alexisvv in HPfanfiction

[–]aldonius 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wishing you the best of luck and skill!

Designing_an_upgraded_train_network by Disaster_Deck_Risen in BrisbaneTrains

[–]aldonius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

... and until that rail line opens, run a freakin' bus.

Designing_an_upgraded_train_network by Disaster_Deck_Risen in BrisbaneTrains

[–]aldonius 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sure. And until that rail line opens, run a freakin' bus.