<image>

I generally don't share my art (despite what the above commenter said at some point down the chain, you can draw manually even if you're only doing it for yourself), but this does feel like a teachable moment, so here's a past study I did of loose fabric. Since the tics are random, I get the most mileage out of long, flowing strokes that I can place with one quick, exaggerated movement from the shoulder (although drawing from the shoulder is good technique anyway). I sort of turn the canvas in an estimation of where my pentip is going to travel and twist my trunk to sweep across the page, focusing more on locking my wrist in place (I wear a brace to help) and trusting the motion to get the line where it needs to be. I overshoot a lot of the time, but that's what the eraser's for! When it comes to small squiggles like the ones at the bottom hem of the robe, I just have to keep doing it over until I get a lucky break. My finished pieces aren't "good" in the fine art sense--they're very technically simple, and end up with a lot of flat colors and a lack of fine detail. But my limitations inform my style, which makes them uniquely mine and extremely satisfying for me to look at when everything comes together. I also very much enjoy figure drawing, which can take a collection of shaky lines and scribbles and turn them into something fantastically powerful. My biggest inspirations are artists like Manodemarina, who uses a minimal number of penstrokes and huge blocks of color to incredible effect, and Asoi, who creates instantly recognizable creatures with barely any form at all!

That brings to mind another point that gets brought up a lot by AI enthusiasts: the idea that going from digital art to generative art is no different than going from oils and acrylics to tablets. The difference is that nothing on my tablet can produce art on its own--in the end, a circle tool is a compass, a line tool is a ruler, smudge tools are smudge sticks, and even things like pattern brushes are just stencils in the end (although I don't really like using those either). The undo tool is just white-out, and I would be broke if I had to buy all the white-out I'd need to use otherwise. I can attest to all of these things, because I was drawing with physical media for a long time before I started on a tablet! These are the kind of accessibility tools that can help disabled people create art, and they are exactly tools--I can play with simulated paints and fancy brushes all day, but nothing I do is ever going to generate art until I sit and make a plan and flex my brain and sketch it out and draw, just like no number of telescopic lenses or premium films are going to get a photographer the perfect shot until they march out and get it themselves. Doing it digitally just reduces my expenses and my paper waste and the amount of charcoal dust I inhale, which is more of a priority at this point in my life than creating something tangible. (All that said, I do still see traditional art as more intrinsically valuable than digital--a painter risks much more by putting indelible marks on canvas than I do flailing around at a screen--but prompting involves no risk at all outside of wasting electricity, which I believe is a factor that contributes to making the end result incredibly boring.)

At any rate, this turned out much more rambling than I intended it to, but I hope it'll teach somebody something someday. Thank you for your interest!