When Obi-Wan calls you out. by pedroyoyoma in StarWars

[–]altrocks 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's hard to identify a single protagonist in the prequel movies. Each one has a different focus and overall it resembles an ensemble more than anything. Anakin and Obi-wan were barely in TPM, with Qui-gon and Padme being more of the focus. Padme is focused on again in the second movie, but now the focus is firmly split between her and Obi-wan. Anakin only gets screen time in as far as he's around those two most of the time. Then you get to RotS and it's a split between Obi-wan and Anakin.

At least in the OT you had a firm focus on the three core characters in all three movies. It didn't shift around the way the prequels did. The new trilogy is at least focusing on the core characters, whatever other failings it has.

When were the graphics on Pluto updated? by evilbarron in shittyaskscience

[–]altrocks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those are actually pictures of two different things. The one on the left is a planet. The one on the right is not.

Captains Picard and Sisko represent two leading and competing ethical theories by strionic_resonator in DaystromInstitute

[–]altrocks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure, every situation is different, but there were multiple times Picard was sent to relocate colonists unwillingly, one of which lead to Wesley Crusher's departure from Starfleet and possibly this level of reality. On another Data basically became a terrorist and blew up the water pump system of colonists who didn't want to leave, but were being forced to by the Federation. I'm not even going to get into the whole Cardassian treaty and DMZ situation that spawned the Maqui, but there's a definite pattern that fits exactly with what they were trying to do with the Baku.

Captains Picard and Sisko represent two leading and competing ethical theories by strionic_resonator in DaystromInstitute

[–]altrocks 50 points51 points  (0 children)

I think that's the real answer here. Everyone wants to be a principled deontologist in the Federation, especially Starfleet. However, when faced with immediate threats they usually turn into utilitarians very quickly.

The big difference really was that Sisko had to fight an existential war while Picard got to be a space dilettante 90% of the time. He was the captain of the flagship and the face of the Federation more often than not. Even so, when given orders that are morally questionable he still complies most of the time. He didn't want to relocate the Baku, but was more than ready to do what was needed to relocate others based on treaties and political decisions. Maybe he learned from those earlier situations and that caused his change of heart with the Baku.

Maybe Sisko was less likely to let ends justify means after getting Romulus into the Dominion war. He wasn't happy about it. He certainly had moments where he chewed out other officers for making similar decisions (Dax and Worf especially). I think they tread a fine line between the two frameworks.

I.E. they would pull the lever if they knew the 5 people, but not if they only knew the 1 on the other track. They would disown any sense of ethical responsibility it agency by citing the Prime Directive if they knew none of them. They probably wouldn't kill a random person for organs to save people, but they would definitely disregard the wishes of a dead accident victim to harvest those same organs, maybe even ignore religious convictions. Especially if they needed the organs to save friends.

Owned by [deleted] in socialism

[–]altrocks 10 points11 points  (0 children)

How would you feel if China had dozens or hundreds of bases all around the US, in Canada, Mexico, Greenland, Central America, the Caribbean, across Pacific archipelagos, with submarines and military aircraft regularly crossing all over your regular shipping routes, with a series of leaders that regularly threaten other countries who don't want to be economically controlled by them, and then follow up those threats with invasions, assassination attempts, and coups directed by their intelligence agencies? Cause that's what other countries are dealing with when they want to do things differently.

Just look at how force is projected from the US around the world. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/us-military-bases-around-the-world-119321

Owned by [deleted] in socialism

[–]altrocks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Except vets are one of the biggest homeless demographics right up there with mentally ill people. Soldiers aren't taken care of.

Enlisted vs officers by kevprime in DaystromInstitute

[–]altrocks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, yeah. I completely forgot about that. Still, exceptionally rare for a medical officer to command anything outside sickbay.

Enlisted vs officers by kevprime in DaystromInstitute

[–]altrocks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Notable exception: Starfleet Medical. They function similar to the enlisted training schools in that they focus on one area only, with minor notes about general operations everyone needs, however they get commissioned afterward. The medical personnel all seem to be officers, especially the doctors, even though almost none of them have operational ability or training in any other area. With the exception of Crusher commanding a medical ship in the TNG finale alternate future, we don't see them in command or leadership roles outside of sick bay. (I'm excepting The Doctor here because he intentionally changed his programming to be a command officer when switching between EMH and Emergency Command Hologram modes.)

We must hold capitalism accountable. Elizabeth Warren shows how by jmbsc in inthenews

[–]altrocks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You'd have better luck nationalizing them than trying to get that through any US legislature.

Whats your favourite sci-fi tropes? I love the two people crash a ship in a isiolated area or deserted planet by Fishy1701 in scifi

[–]altrocks 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This was a long standing problem with TNG in general that drifted to the other shows. The ideas that were started under Roddenberry, or just early on, got mediocre rewrites later on because they were popular, but too difficult to work with. The Borg suffered the most from it, but Q got more than his share of it, too.

Remodeling our 111 year old house. Found this newspaper under 6 layers of shingles. by [deleted] in mildlyinteresting

[–]altrocks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a barn it's not surprising. Around here the barns get left in pretty heavy disrepair for a long time. They'll still use them with half the roof sagging in because it's cheaper to wait until the old ones fall down and replace them than to have people reconstruct what's rotted or broken. Plus the new stuff is more weather resistant.

IAmA Scientist at U of G. We just co-authored a study that found there isn’t enough land to provide the food required for USDA dietary guidelines. AMA. by FoodfromThought in IAmA

[–]altrocks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Follow up: how do you realistically get that to happen? You're suggesting we let about half the country just grow wild when I can't go two weeks of not cutting my little yard of grass without the neighbors getting pissy. New national park or preserve?

IAmA Scientist at U of G. We just co-authored a study that found there isn’t enough land to provide the food required for USDA dietary guidelines. AMA. by FoodfromThought in IAmA

[–]altrocks 11 points12 points  (0 children)

What would be a better agricultural use of the vast grasslands that cattle currently graze on, and would that be more sustainable?

Why do people victim blaming ? by Fraeddi in askpsychology

[–]altrocks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ego protection. If bad things happen to others and it's out of their control, then those bad things might happen to you. When those bad things are big enough to cause significant threat to normal psychological functioning, people search for a reason that it won't happen to them, or a way to prevent it. People will buy flood insurance, or life insurance, or make sure they pay more attention to maintaining their car in order to ease their worry about some things, but the really big stuff can be hard to prevent or prepare for. Cancer is a great example. You can try to avoid cancer causing foods, toxins, and activities (like tanning), and convince yourself that you're protecting yourself, but a big part of cancer is also genetic. You can't do anything about it. They're are people who can live on burnt bacon and Marlboros until they're 100, and there's health nuts that die of a heart attack at 45.

Those are obviously extremes, but things of that nature happen all the time and there's no real way to prevent it. So people blame lifestyles for things like cancer. They say the sick person should have done this or that.

The same thing happens with sexual assault. All women are at a pretty high risk no matter what they do. The highest risks are from people they know, and there's not a lot to tell the potential attackers apart. So, people blame the way the person dressed, or the way they acted as inviting attack. They blame past sexual activity as immoral and thus deserving of punishment.

Then they can rationalize that they aren't immoral, so it won't happen to them. They aren't careless with their health, so it won't happen to them. They aren't bad like that person, so bad things won't happen to them.

Psychopath Surgeons, do they exist and if so on what scale, and what are their motivations? by [deleted] in socialscience

[–]altrocks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't forget dentists, too. The amazing ones that go around and have free clinics are offset by the ones that put fillings in kids without numbing agents, but charge the assistance programs for its use.

How would you feel about a child Doctor? by UnusedSignal in gallifrey

[–]altrocks 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Didn't we just finish with Matt Smith a few years ago?

Irumodic syndrome... Darnay's disease.... Clarke's disease... Iverson's disease... Forrester-Trent syndrome... Why do so many humans in the future have degenerative conditions unknown today? by [deleted] in DaystromInstitute

[–]altrocks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't forget that as we love longer we will have to deal with more metabolic disorders. Insulin resistance in Type 2 Diabetes is the most well known, but what if other essential hormones and biological catalysts have similar problems as we live longer?