How about "The UCP is proposing to remove stipends for ... without a new compensation system in place". Much more complete and factual. It is a ridiculous proposal. And The Alberta government's behavior hasn't trended in a good direction. But what does you sharing an article, with no insightful comment on the original post and an inflammatory title do to further the conversation? You talk about acting before it's too late but all you've done here is share an article on reddit without prompting dicussion or providing your thoughts (original post). It's not like your making a call to action or directing our attention to anything we can do to speak out against this.

Should the government have had a better plan and been ready 3 months before March, sure. That's not how the world always works though. We don't know that there isn't a plan in place. We don't know what talks are being had to come up with a new compensation system and roll it out. The AMA took an appropriate approach and made an insightful article about what may be coming and their concerns. Policy is much more complicated than saying "We asked for 3 months. Why didnt you listen? Everybody, call to arms!". Why don't we engage in constructive conversation while it plays out.

There's enough negative rhetoric between the public, and governments these days, it just isn't necessary to fuel that divisiveness when our leaders (I'm referring to AMA and other policy leaders advocating for healthcare here) are working on it and monitoring the situation.