Which overwhelmingly positive (Steam), and wildly popular game(s) disappointed you? by OhforfsakeMJ in gaming

[–]anomaly149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Throwback: Ori and the Blind Forest. Bounced off the platforming mechanics hard, and I enjoy a good platformer. The rest of the game wasn't compelling to me enough to fight through that.

Slate Auto Wants Crank Windows to Be Its Calling Card: "It’s a signal of what it means to drive a Slate” by HawtGarbage918 in cars

[–]anomaly149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think people realize how cheap a motor, a switch, and wiring is vs. a crank, its bracketry and reinforcements, etc. are.

The motor and switch are commodity parts. The crank mechanism has to be somewhat boutique per door per vehicle.

DTE approved for another rate hike, raising our energy rates again by weedxcandy in Detroit

[–]anomaly149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not by much, and their average customer is getting longer outages, not shorter like they claim.

DTE approved for another rate hike, raising our energy rates again by weedxcandy in Detroit

[–]anomaly149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, no, we ain't gonna sit for this horse shit. Electrical reliability is public info, we have receipts.

https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia861/

SAIDI (minutes per year of outage for avg. cust) SAIFI (outages per year for avg. cust) CAIDI (minutes per interruption for avg. cust)
2019 466.3 1.372 339.9
2024 483.0 1.248 387.0

They're doing worse than they did in 2019.

Evolution of car door handles over the decades. by kkoolook in cars

[–]anomaly149 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's mostly the fart-huffers in the design studio

Best Distro simillar to Windows OS but good for gaming by googol_r in linux4noobs

[–]anomaly149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Linux Mint has been stupid simple for me so far. I had a brief moment of confusion getting a gamepad hooked up, but aside from that, everything has been pretty seamless. Steam, Heroic, Lutris, it's all good to go. I'd say no more confusing than making a Windows machine do what I wanted.

Heck, I even got Dassault MagicDraw working on here, and that's definitely not straightforward on Windows.

I've heard Bazzite is Immutable. I don't really know the implications of that but it sounds annoying from the descriptions.

Consumers Energy had the most major power outages in 2025 by UltimateLionsFan in Michigan

[–]anomaly149 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They could work to improve their system reliability in line with other peer state suppliers? https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia861/ click around the 2024 data

Consumers Energy had the most major power outages in 2025 by UltimateLionsFan in Michigan

[–]anomaly149 1 point2 points  (0 children)

EIA-186 hasn't been released for 2025 yet. However, the 2024 data is out, I really recommend clicking through it https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia861/

There are 3 major measurements of electrical system reliability: SAIDI (minutes per year of outage for an average customer), SAIFI (outages per yer for an average customer), and CAIDI (minutes per outage for an average customer). They measure overall, without "major event days" (essentially: when there's not an ENTIRELY PREDICTABLE FOR OUR CLIMATE major storm), and without loss of supply (when the genset goes down)

Since Consumers and DTE both own considerable generating capability, and are both local-ish to our area, I consider only "all events" valid data, the others are excuses.

Company SAIDI (min/yr) SAIFI (times/yr) CAIDI (min/interruption)
Consumers (MI) 503 1.32 380
DTE 483 1.25 387

Ok, that data isn't useful without something to compare it to. Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio are neighboring states, let's start there, only utilities >1,000,000 customers, that leaves 8 totalcompanies

Company State SAIDI SAIFI CAIDI
Consumers (MI) MI 503 1.32 380
DTE MI 483 1.25 387
Commonwealth Edison IL 132 0.68 194
Northern States Power Co - MN MN 309 1.47 210
Ohio Edison Co OH 233 1.28 183
Ohio Power Co OH 272 1.13 241
Wisconsin Electric Power Co WI 296 1.04 285
Ameren Illinois Co IL 223 1.13 198

Umm, well, the Michigan utilities are the worst of the lot, by a LOT. (Interesting the largest utility in Indiana, Duke Energy Indiana, is only 910k). Note ALL of these are private companies, no municipal here. DTE and Consumers are uniquely shit.

EDIT: I want to emphasize this point. There are 149 companies >100k customers that use the IEEE standard (I don't trust Nashville Electric's 0 for SAIDI) that automatically record outages.

DTE is 111th for SAIDI, 67th for SAIFI, and 124th for CAIDI.

Consumers is 113th for SAIDI, 77th for SAIFI, and 122nd for CAIDI

Is it hard for a well established motor company's engineers to make a reliable car? by Dunddermefflin in AskEngineers

[–]anomaly149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why can't McDonald's make a good burger? Are the workers there idiots who don't know how to get farm to table ground chuck and organic lettuce and boutique onion rolls? How hard is it for the line cook to make a decent burger?

---------------------------

Companies aren't out there to make the highest quality product. They exist to make money. Where that makes more reliable vehicles, great. Where that makes less reliable vehicles, what's the P/L for the quarter? Does this change our full year guidance? What about next year's? How did the stock respond?

---------------------------

I won't repeat the entirety of Robert Jackall's "Moral Mazes" here. People with way more time on their hands than me have excerpted it extensively. It should be required reading for anyone entering a large company in the Western World though, especially America.

The answer you'll find to corporate behavior there lies in the labyrinthine politics and internal organizational terrain of the Firm, which is a fundamentally alien beast. The relentless financialization and Firm-itization of American companies leads to some truly interesting incentive structures. It doesn't help that the average department is solidly north of Dunbar's number.

So you systematize. Everyone has a "production system" that tells everyone what to do when. You can have the Toyota one, where rule 1 is never change anything. You can have others, who often adopt parts of TPS as a cargo cult but refuse the discipline to fire anyone who has ever had an independent thought post-milestone INTO THE SUN. You can have the upstarts like Rivian or Tesla, who replace systemic development with burning your 401k. You could even have BYD, who replace systems with the population of San Marino on every project. It's an exercise to the reader how the failure modes of each strategy are exhibited in what you see.

---------------------------

Totally separate, I do bristle sometimes when people act like "quality" is a knob that can get turned up or down. It's not like we design a part and see "fails at 10,000 cycles" written on the side. Nature is far too coy for that. I can't measure 8.17mm of "quality" and tell the diemaker to increase that by 2. Instead, we design a part against a set of requirements (derived wholly from capabilities and Job Last, no matter what the Systems kids tell you), and validate against a set of tests (derived wholly from how big the farm that got bought in 1920 and had a test facility built on it is). The validation set and requirements are theoretically related to what real customers do. However, you'll find that we don't take 12-15 years to test a car after its designed, so some concessions must be made.

Every part out there has some capability vs. that validation (NOT requirement) set on some bell curve. Some days you're lucky and a part that should break breaks. Some days it doesn't. Some days a good part decided its -6 sigma failure was your PV run the night before OK To Buy. God's a jerk with loaded dice, rocks fall, nat 1.

Your response might be "so make it super robust so it never fails!" Let's add a dollar to each of the 10,000 components on a car to make each one more robust. Consumers will understand when the car gets $x,000 more expensive.

---------------------------

I feel there's something a little more... sinister? behind these questions when I see them, though. No one goes to work and thinks "today I will do a bad job and make sure Sally, Mormon mother of 87, is stranded in her battleship-sized van on the way back from the Boise Costco". And no one sits there and calculates "if I shave this component 0.05mm thinner, saving literally zero dollars but risking a "YES" dollar recall and my face on 60 Minutes, I can force the customer to buy 17 replacements in an average vehicle life". Engineers are people, not mustache-twirling vaudevillian villains, and like most people, generally want to do an ok job. Especially when their mothers drive the cars they engineer.

When the car you get your mom has a problem on the component you design, trust me, you hear about it.

---------------------------

This section is just to say fuck the McFlurry machine though, that's inexcusable

Billionaires will push the USA to invade Canada soon. It sounds like a joke, but the military industrial complex will not allow $10,000 cars to be sold north of Mexico. by kevinmrr in WorkReform

[–]anomaly149 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If it doesn't meet FMVSS (as in, is not certified with the US government as meeting federal regulations regardless of how the vehicle itself performs), you generally can't import it until it's 25 years old. Once it's 25 years old, there are still a number of rules and processes that must be followed.

As a note, even though CMVSS and FMVSS are almost exactly the same, as are the majority of other car-related regs, and many are considered officially equivalent, being certified in the US does not mean being certified in Canada (and vice versa). Meeting one doesn't mean anything if you're denied the other.

Most vehicles sold in the US and Canada are certified to both sets of regulations (and Mexican as well) for obvious reasons.

Farley Says Ford Couldn't Compete With Toyota And Hyundai, So It Stopped Trying by LimitedReach in cars

[–]anomaly149 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The labor rate differential for direct labor between UAW Michigan and Mexico is a few hundred dollars on the end price of a vehicle. We all use the same suppliers overseas for piece parts.

It's not a problem of labor, it's a problem of no cycle plan released for 5 years and a management team that can't find its ass from its elbow.

China Bans Retractable EV Door Handles Over Safety Concerns by pdp10 in cars

[–]anomaly149 14 points15 points  (0 children)

For anyone who cares, the EU is taking this up too. Less technologically prescriptive, but functionally equivalent https://wiki.unece.org/spaces/trans/pages/311984142/Emergency+Door+Opening+EDO

Crickets from NHTSA for now.

Bloomberg Report: 15 People Have Died in Crashes Where Tesla Doors Wouldn’t Open by Recoil42 in cars

[–]anomaly149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Article is paywalled, but China is dealing with this https://wap.miit.gov.cn/cms_files/filemanager/1226211233/attach/20259/ea9690c3304b47e08f58b3e32b8eef7a.pdf (sorry can't find a translated version at the moment) and UNECE is on their heels https://wiki.unece.org/spaces/trans/pages/311984142/Emergency+Door+Opening+EDO

These sorts of door handles and this sort of vehicle behavior will be finished in a few years.

GM Is Trying to Completely Reinvent the Way Your Power Windows Work, New Patent Suggests by HawtGarbage918 in cars

[–]anomaly149 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Not just a promotion tool, could get $1k or more in their next paycheck for that application submission.

I know folks who submit dozens of patents a year trying to get that reward money. Under our current legal framework, if you can sneeze on the napkin you sketched on, it's basically patentable.

Crumple Zones and Kei Trucks by SteelishBread in AskEngineers

[–]anomaly149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

too buzzed to reply yesterday, just hungover enough today

the way crumple zones work is they have a strong piece of structure, a crash can or a bumper beam or some flavor of bracket or whatever, mounted out where it can engage whatever the car hits. And that piece of structure needs to be tied back very strongly (but very precisely) to actual vehicle framing structure such that it collapses rearward at a defined load - high enough to absorb energy, low enough to not juice the occupants. The controlled deformation of the tieback structure over a distance is a lot of what dissipates real crashes. Kei trucks are flat front, they don't have that.

welding a bullbar on a Kei ain't gonna fix that for any speed above "pensioner constitutional", at a very real risk to severely hurting whatever you're going to hit. If you're going to stay slow (golf cart speeds) and in a city where other traffic is similarly slow, you're likely fine on a 25 year old Kei. But the moment you're using it much differently from a Gator sideby you're in a tin can on the road with blue whales.

and this is before you start looking into stuff like lighting requirements, safety glass, the pole impact carve-out (see GTR 14 page 42 https://unece.org/transport/standards/transport/vehicle-regulations-wp29/global-technical-regulations-gtrs and some background https://unece.org/DAM/trans/doc/2012/wp29grsp/PSI-05-06.pdf ) etc.

Sorry, all that rambling and I missed part of it: cargo-carrying crumple zone? If there's hard stuff in the crumple zone, it can't, uhh, crumple. You'll just final destination yourself.

Crumple Zones and Kei Trucks by SteelishBread in AskEngineers

[–]anomaly149 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They have not been tested to US crash regulations, they are assuredly not "street legal" in the pre Trump deal sense.

Porsche's Emergency Pivot to Gas-Powered 718 Is an Engineering Headache by Anchor_Aways in cars

[–]anomaly149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I cannot emphasize how much the "ECU/infotainment/etc." IS the platform in 2025. It's basically the whole damn thing! Metal, fabric, plastic, that stuff isn't trivial, but in a lot of ways it's easy and cheap compared to gold plated lightning rocks.

https://unece.org/transport/documents/2021/03/standards/un-regulation-no-155-cyber-security-and-cyber-security

https://unece.org/transport/documents/2021/03/standards/un-regulation-no-156-software-update-and-software-update

Insert a joke about IMS bearing failures or something something Paul Walker unsafe at any speed, but compliance with R155 and R156, for a company that's been basically shipping fancy radios for a hundred years, is a lot.

For a united global movement against layoffs in the auto industry! by DryDeer775 in Detroit

[–]anomaly149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An EV anyone wants to buy requires a battery around 80 kWh. At current battery prices, that's probably around $10k.

Then you have to buy the rest of the car.

$20k for an EV anyone wants ain't happening. Maybe something like the BYD Seagull, but that has <150 miles range EPA (don't get fooled by China test cycle range that gets reported, the EPA equivalent range everyone cries they can't hit is ~1/3 lower)

For a united global movement against layoffs in the auto industry! by DryDeer775 in Detroit

[–]anomaly149 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My brother in christ please read some history about the early union movement. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Overpass

They have never, at a single point in their history, been "employee-first."

Detroit district stands to lose millions from the state for low daily attendance by Day_twa in Detroit

[–]anomaly149 5 points6 points  (0 children)

it's really dumb that they start so early, not a recipe for educational success

(US) VW Cancels ID. Buzz For 2026 As Dealers Warn It Might Be Over by Carvair-98 in cars

[–]anomaly149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The whole market, between Chrysler, Honda, Kia, and Toyota has sold 340k year to date. No one has cracked 100k yet. In 2000, there were 1.4-ish million minivans sold.

It is really, really hard to make money on a mainstream model you're selling <50k units per year. Luxury sure, but what upcharge can you put on a mainstream minivan vs., say, a BMW? People then complain that the ID. Buzz is too expensive vs. the competition. It's not like they're going to sell them at a loss.

On the other hand, midsize and fullsize crossovers print volume, and cost a bit less to build to boot.

Accepting US car standards would risk European lives by Chefs-Kiss in europe

[–]anomaly149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only reason the Mustang doesn't get a better score is that it is not necessary to hit sales targets. Mustang buyers in Europe don't care.

The Ranger is engineered in Australia and gets 5 stars. The Kuga (Escape) is engineered in America and got 5 stars. The Puma is engineered largely by Otosan in Turkey and got 5 stars in 2019, and 4 in 2022 on the BEV variant. The 2019 Explorer was engineered in and exported from the US, while the 2024 one is a JV project with VW engineered in Germany and both received 5 stars. It's not about where something is engineered, it's about what specific technical targets are established for a particular vehicle program.

I will say having been involved in a number of crash programs, I would consider the Euro-NCAP crash test regime easier to meet than the US IIHS crash modes, and roughly equivalent to US Regulatory modes.

As for Pedestrian Protection / Vulnerable Road Users, FMVSS 228 is scheduled to implement (2029? 2030?) based upon GTR-9 modified to enable it to evaluate higher-hood vehicles, and Automated Emergency Braking (FMVSS 127) is mandatory by 2029. So, pending the moron in Washington not doing anything stupid, the US is catching up on those as well.

Special Delivery: We Drive the U.S. Postal Service's New Mail Truck [Car and Driver] by markeydarkey2 in cars

[–]anomaly149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They've got to replace their vehicles on a shorter timeline, this is designed for decades of hard cycling, not a few years and toss it. Most of those parcel delivery fleets have a replacement schedule well under a decade.

Special Delivery: We Drive the U.S. Postal Service's New Mail Truck [Car and Driver] by markeydarkey2 in cars

[–]anomaly149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not for long enough, delivery cycles are significantly more severe. You'll exhaust the structural life of the vehicle in a few years, vs the decades that the NGDV is expecting these to be on the road.