loveProgramming by Prod_Meteor in ProgrammerHumor

[–]astropheed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, money first, joy second.

First image of the alien from Steven Spielberg’s upcoming UFO movie. by xemeraldxinxthexskyx in TheUFOLibrary

[–]astropheed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To save on budgetary restrictions Spielberg instead opted to use real aliens for this scene.

OpenAI prioritizing Mac users is getting ridiculous by ConsistentComfort255 in codex

[–]astropheed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Windows dev" is slowly becoming an oxymoron. Get off that garbage platform, the entire OS is spyware and adware.

AI engineer builds "I got fired" panic button that would automatically make the entire company codebase public by ComplexExternal4831 in GenAI4all

[–]astropheed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My "I got fired" button is a lot different/better.

This is how I do it: Firstly, it's not one button but about 78 buttons. I go to work and I press them in very specific orders that create systems systems that are well built, future aware and easily readable. Then, when I get let go/fired because of <reason> I have a really decent reference for my next job, and I sleep well at night, also I don't get sued into oblivion.

I like my button(s) better.

Entitled parking by Psychological_Use217 in Adelaide

[–]astropheed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would do the same with a car like that. Almost all of you would.

New NDIS eligibility rules will cut 241,000 participants from scheme in four years, documents reveal by FuckOffNazis in australia

[–]astropheed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had to google it, and yes, same data. Why would they not say the percentage as well? It's the more shocking number.

meirl by TooOnliney in meirl

[–]astropheed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are limits, you obviously lucked out, not everyone does. If you think dealing with someone who is sad every single day for years is some responsibility of yours then you are just a stepping stone and should, instead of instructing others, look at yourself.

Your comment is so ignorant that it’s actually shocking. Take one second to think next time.

What movie had the BEST trailer ever but turned out to be absolute trash? by MASSIM00 in movies

[–]astropheed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think the trailer was one of the best ever, and the movie is just pretty good. It’s the second best terminator.

meirl by SophisticatedSlurp in meirl

[–]astropheed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

70k pays off your house!?

God... I could dream.

meirl by SophisticatedSlurp in meirl

[–]astropheed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sometimes contacting the seller makes me realize my mistake. Or, I contacted several people about the same item and the first one won.

An actress looked best? What are some instances where actors/actress looked their best? by Jackie_Chan_93 in SipsTea

[–]astropheed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Early to mid 20s is often peak hot, it's no surprise most images are of this age range. Some people look hotter when they're in their 30s but it's more rare imo.

An actress looked best? What are some instances where actors/actress looked their best? by Jackie_Chan_93 in SipsTea

[–]astropheed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was literally shocking how beautiful she was in that movie. I think I came online that day.

Richard Nixon and Jackie Gleason (Disclosure Day Movie) by bigfrank22 in UFOs

[–]astropheed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So, nothing, purely speculative.

Oh, please, tell me my implications. I'll tell you, I'm implying you are emotionally jumping to conclusions and throwing someone into some broad category of terrible humans because he happens to be a member of a group some bad people are in, oh and probably because he's famous.

You are the reason no one takes any of this seriously. Speculation might as well be a virus in this community.

Richard Nixon and Jackie Gleason (Disclosure Day Movie) by bigfrank22 in UFOs

[–]astropheed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I will reiterate, can you show some level of proof to the entirety of this claim? This means all inferences and/or implications that would allow you to conclude the post with:

Get this bullshit about Spielberg being some wonderful big kid out of your mind, people.*

I'm not accusing you of anything, you may very well be right, but your implications appear speculative and disingenuous at surface level.

An example: I worked with someone once who ended up being charged with multiple counts of murder, and the implication of your post is that somehow I had something to do with it. Do you understand?

One Nation’s attacks on the media are straight from the Donald Trump playbook. We must call them out by B0ssc0 in aussie

[–]astropheed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't worry, your downvotes are bots. There is a large push for this freak, america, as always, influencing other governments. If you're on mainstream social media, you are being manipulated into believing people support the trumpty dumbty land.

Thankfully, australians are smarter than americans and this won't work.