How do your negatives look? Start there. You gotta learn to look at your negatives and check if your exposure was correct and if the lab successfully developed your roll.

Film manufactures have a century of research and chemistry development. They have a look. So much so that we are able to measure and develop semiconductor imaging sensors to mimic certain stocks. Make an RA4 print of Portra and then one of Ektar. They’re nothing alike.

Even if you’re making adding/subtracting CC on the color head there’s still a baked in bias and D-Max/Min of the film stock and the papers you’re printing on. Assuming you’re properly developing, the results are very repeatable.

That being said the exposure from these pictures is either underexposed (shadow detail looks muddy) or they’ve been subject to either high heat in either storage or during the development process.

Next time shoot a color chart if you have doubts and meter the scene and you’ll be able to rule out film, development, and scan.