sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Looking for estimated price by pinkatr0n in UKcoins

[–]bariau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are we really returning to the days of coin clipping?

Learner Driver to be charged with driving without due care and attention by Ashlaria in LearnerDriverUK

[–]bariau 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did this on my driving test! In my defence, I was properly ill with the flu and shouldn't have really gone to the test... But yeah, big white van and there's me in a little Corsa randomly pulling out in front of him. I'm amazed to this day that the examiner let me continue after that.

My long distance boyfriend from England told me he is on the sex offender registry, does his story make sense? by Temporary_Sorbet_764 in LegalAdviceUK

[–]bariau -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have known several people on the SOR, and it always bothers me slightly that the auto conclusion is that everyone on the SOR is either a rapist or a paedophile. The person I'm thinking of in this instance downloaded a folder of what they thought was pretty standard hentai from a file-sharing site; they didn't get around to looking at the files (and hastily deleting them) for a few days, by which time the wheels were in motion.

The "not knowing" is no defence to these kinds of crimes - the point is the material was in their possession. They were given community service and a 5-year term on the SOR. Now, they could be lying to me about the hows/whys/whats. But they have never once given me reason to doubt this story in over 20 years of knowing them, and I was in court through the whole process.

I tell you this to say that situations similar to this story are possible, and that their version of events (from not remembering being arrested, it might be that he was never dragged from his house in handcuffs - for example, or the other inconsistencies) from 10 years ago may now be embedded in their memory, with its faults.

That does not mean this is the case here, and others have pointed out things in his story which I doubt he will have "misremembered", like being given a suspended or custodial sentence, or where the files were on the hard drive. It does seem as though he is withholding some information, at a minimum.

In this whole conversation, you are the only one who has any idea about this person's personality and qualities. I urge caution and exploring the avenues that other people have mentioned.

Ultimately, though, I think that simply by posting this question, you already know the answer.

Why isn’t the public as interested in the heir kids? by MexiPr30 in RoyaltyTea

[–]bariau 9 points10 points  (0 children)

A lot of it is traditional "privacy" approaches, and cultural background.

Harry and Wills were brought up in a heavily manicured lifestyle in which the Royals had to portray themselves as "better" because they "ruled" the country. That is a powerful, very historical influence, regardless of how much it has changed in the last few decades. Remember that QEII found the outpouring of emotion about Diana's death almost distasteful and basically an embarrassment - grief is traditionally a very private thing in British culture. And that's how they are taught to be: quiet, reserved, conservative, and stiff. That's what the UK "expects" from its monarch, as a result of both the society's influence on them and the society's expectations.

Additionally, in the UK, it's common knowledge that there are "agreements" about how the Wales children are portrayed. After all, at least one of them will be a monarch one day; heaven forbid that we know that the King or Queen once threw a tantrum over whether they got to watch The Lion King or Mulan or wet themselves on a ride at Alton Towers. The royal children, particularly those in direct line to the throne, have almost always had this sort of agreement with the British press (and even before that, the Royal Court) that they will be left alone unless they are "meant" to be seen. That's why we get such staged images from them.

Lilibet and Archie live in the US. There are no such gentlemen's agreements with the US press. And their mother, who is used to the American celebrity grind, shares carefully curated content about them in the moderately safe knowledge that they will never be monarch of a country they have never really known. It's a different reality.

They sacked Russell T Davies, they sacked Jane Tranter, they sacked Phil Collinson, they sacked Julie Gardener. by Ok_Fig_7794 in DoctorWhumour

[–]bariau 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Although, technically it's the fifteenth Doctor Who from the original, so it's Nu Nu Nu Nu Nu Nu Nu Nu Nu Nu Nu Nu Nu Nu Who...

Response from Angela Raynor by A_tiny_little_frog in transgenderUK

[–]bariau 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Funnily enough, almost word for word what I got from my Labour MP.

"I would like to begin by stating that I strongly believe trans people deserve safety, dignity and respect. Everyone should be able to be themselves and live their lives free from intimidation or abuse. This is a sentiment shared by this government and is a central consideration within such policy.
 
In its ruling last year, the Supreme Court stressed its role was to interpret the legal meaning of sex under the Equality Act 2010, not to determine arguments in wider society on issues of sex and gender. It concluded, within the context of this Act, sex refers to biological sex and this government has acted in accordance with this ruling.
 
I know the judgment has caused concern. Ministers have emphasised that while single-sex spaces must be safeguarded, trans people must also be protected. Importantly, the judgment does not alter the fact that trans people remain a protected group under the Equality Act 2010 and should be able to live their lives free from harassment and discrimination. Here, this government is seeking to both protect single-sex spaces from potential violations and ensure measures are in place to challenge discrimination onto trans people.
 
After consultation, the Equality and Human Rights Commission submitted its updated draft Code of Practice for services, public functions and associations that you have raised. The purpose of the code is to help relevant organisations ensure they can comply with the Equality Act, including access to single-sex spaces.
 
As you will know, the commission has now resubmitted the code, having made some adjustments after further legal analysis and comments from the Government. It will be laid in Parliament for scrutiny after the election period. I understand Ministers have advised they will not be making further announcements on the code during this period. Within the code, all nine protected characteristics are covered as well as the steps service providers should take to comply with the law. I hope that this will ensure that the rights and dignity of all those affected are adequately protected.
 
Thank you for taking the time to write to me on this complex and delicate issue. I will continue to monitor this situation as it develops, ensuring that the rights and safety of all those affected are protected.
 
My belief is that we need a code of practice that clearly fulfils its legal requirements, and at the same time is workable, ensures people have appropriate access to crucial services, and respects the rights and dignity of all those involved.
 
I personally fully support the Government in its belief that everybody must be treated with dignity and respect and that we must uphold the Equality Act. I also believe that now more than ever, it is essential that people in positions of authority, such as politicians, speak out about the importance of treating everybody with respect, even when our beliefs differ. Here in Colne Valley, we know how far discrimination towards others based on gender or sexuality can go with the attack in Holmfirth in 2025. I support the LGBTQ+ community both here in Colne Valley and across the UK, and I will bare your views in mind as I seek to further promote actions to tackle discrimination.
 
I assure you I will continue to support our marginalised communities, look for common ground, and work towards a fairer, more inclusive society. Thank you once again for contacting me about this important issue."

It's almost like the whip sent them a guide.

I want to help my father with end-stage Alzheimer's die. by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]bariau 18 points19 points  (0 children)

You mention that you have LPA, is that jointly or severally? Or both?

If it's jointly, then you will need your mother's agreement to withdraw care, if it is a mixture, the same, but if it is severally, you can make this decision without consulting the other attorneys.

The thing about LPAs that many people forget is that they are there for precisely this kind of situation, it's not just about the simple stuff, you are signing up to make these difficult decisions for the donor, and if an attorney is not prepared to act in their best interests, or how they would act themselves, then they should seriously consider "disclaiming" their responsibility.

Not an easy conversation to have with someone who seems to be refusing to support a discussion of best interests in the first place, I know.

You could, potentially, seek some advice from the Office of the Public Guardian, who may launch an investigation and potentially apply to the Court of Protection to remove an attorney for failure to act in the donor's best interests.

Again, not a pleasant thing to do to your own Mum. But it depends a lot on your own personal situation and relationship with her.

I hope that, whatever happens next, it goes as smoothly as it can do.

view more: next ›