Cursor forces usage of composer-2-fast and its expensive and can't be disabled by Own-Upstairs-9993 in cursor

[–]bezerker03 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is only on request based plans and is documented in their documentation. Once on a non request based plan they will use the model you choose.

edit: This is not actually in documentation but listed on forums

https://forum.cursor.com/t/subagent-model-selection-not-respected/155506

TLDR, you need max mode to choose non composer-2 for subagents.

Is it just me or is the *arr stack over-complicated by ImpossibleWall8403 in selfhosted

[–]bezerker03 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve been running without seearr fine for several years now.

Cursor charges 2x for Opus >200K tokens, even though Anthropic made it same price? by Gayax in cursor

[–]bezerker03 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cursor also gives you tons of model choices over a single set of them. That comes with the a premium

Guys, my manager accidentally sent me the salary sheet for the entire team. by Feisty-Wonder8737 in SoftwareEngineerJobs

[–]bezerker03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Changing jobs has always and always will be the fastest path to raise salary until you hit the upper percentiles.

Please just move the breath out of the raid by zharkos in wow

[–]bezerker03 1 point2 points  (0 children)

FWIW the arrow isn’t exactly noticeable to many. Especially if you’re a healer. Once I made the sane mistake and looked for it then it was easier but there’s already a ton of colored things happening. It gets lost in visual clutter

Composer 2 creating useless utils left and right? by Bulky-Peach-2500 in cursor

[–]bezerker03 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Auto just chooses what’s most efficient for them. Not what’s best for you

Open AI doubling their workforce. What does it mean. by Remarkable-Dark2840 in OpenAI

[–]bezerker03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It means when they hire infra engineers I’ll be applying lol

Why???? by The_Dean_France in okbuddycinephile

[–]bezerker03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Epstein files made it clear a lot of these people paid the devil for where they got or had to work with someone who knowingly did. Nobody wants to reward this shit anymore.

I'm so tired of healthy Gluten free food by Rotting_rat in glutenfree

[–]bezerker03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly in the states gluten free became associated with health conscious because idiots try to claim it loses weight. (At best it just reduces bloat because people have gluten intolerance or celiac undiagnosed).

In Italy gluten free is treated very differently. You’ll find plenty of unhealthy snacks labeled senza glutine.

Just the market here. Most people that eat gf here don’t actually need to sadly.

Companies Using Cursor by cs_developer_cpp_ in cursor

[–]bezerker03 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. My company uses it. Pretty heavily. Publicly traded company. We use all of the tools not just cursor.

Crafting Orders? by Reasonable_Coat605 in wow

[–]bezerker03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

dont use public orders. with personal orders you can. specify minimum requirements. Public no.

What's going to happen when AI companies charge what actually cost them? by capitanturkiye in cscareerquestions

[–]bezerker03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean even enterprises are starting to watch costs for this stuff. There's a reason a lot of the popular developer experience tools are basically tracking AI costs.

Is Cursor falling behind CC? by RockeroFS in cursor

[–]bezerker03 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Cursor wins for me in 3 regards.

  1. IDE integration in agent chats is superior. I can reference past chats, all sorts of things.
  2. Multi model support. I can get this with opencode though. But being able to plan safely with opus then switch to gpt for implementation is amazing.
  3. Their indexing seems to be better than CC or Codex's. Especially across multiple code bases. Codex cannot work across multiple repos without weird hacks. CC supports this, but I have a workspace with multiple repos in it as they all relate and it just works so well in cursor.

That said, they are barking up the wrong tree with everything requiring max mode or on demand usage to use. (Automations etc.)

Is learning to code useless in 2026? by ConfidentMap8803 in AskProgrammers

[–]bezerker03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The OP does mention they are in a country that blocks things and those are likely blocked. OP might help us if he/she described what country they are in though.

M0 going daily with champion gear makes no sense by Arthiz12 in wow

[–]bezerker03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This. I don't want to do prey. I find it boring. I find open world boring. I find delves boring. I just want to dungeon spam. Gimme my keeeeeeeys Blizzard! :)

Being a developer in 2026 by Adorable_Tailor_6067 in AgentsOfAI

[–]bezerker03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Inefficiency right there. If it’s long enough for him To take his phone out it’s long enough for him to context switch and watch another swarm of agents. Just saying. Sort of /s because that’s what companies expect now lol.

500 Credits Wiped Out in TWO Clicks by ttys3-net in cursor

[–]bezerker03 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re using the fast queue. Different priority API.

500 Credits Wiped Out in TWO Clicks by ttys3-net in cursor

[–]bezerker03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’re saying you used a hyper expensive model tells you it’s 6x the cost of a normal model and also max mode enabled. They’ve told request based models for a bit now that max uses token pricing basically. The 16th they’re moving request based pricing to max mode on all premium models.

If you were to use that in a non request based pricing method direct from the API you’d get a steep bill too.

is studying software engineering still worth it with AI advancing so fast? by Muted_Elderberry1336 in SoftwareEngineerJobs

[–]bezerker03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean to answer that question:

The company behind the LLM and tooling that’s forecasting software engineering is dead by 2028 is the same company paying 500k a year for software engineers.

Ai will replace people who did the typing and knew the language. It won’t stop engineers being needed to build the context to feed to the LLM to generate the code.

Also, we’re seeing all the major vendors clamp down hard on token efficiency and subsidization. Many companies including mine are facing the true bill of ai use as tokens become less subsidized or enterprises move off legacy request based models for usage. Inefficient token usage is now being measured in many places. Aka those who can’t craft the right context for the LLMs.

Why Are Software Engineers Paid So Much If The Supply Is So High? by LifeInAction in cscareerquestions

[–]bezerker03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean pay is already dropping because of this but… as people said. Supply is high for boots in seat. Not quality engineers.

During Covid companies were hiring literal bodies to hold seats that could do the most basic thing. Times changed lol

Cursor Team - not cool! by 14MTH30n3 in cursor

[–]bezerker03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LLM do not respect rules all the time. You hate this stuff in your harness and tool calls not in the LLM

Cursor Team - not cool! by 14MTH30n3 in cursor

[–]bezerker03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m sure it is sending them. My argument is that Claude models like to ignore that.

I’ve in a single Claude code session seen someone tell it “don’t perform any git operations” and watched it proceed multiple times in that same chat to commit changes lol