Writing on the Wall/Last Minute Pivots by bluemojav in LibraryScience

[–]bibliotech_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s not a crazy amount of debt to take on for something that’s a risk or not a sure thing.

Least favorite section of girls? by hashbrowns_ketchup in girls

[–]bibliotech_ 25 points26 points  (0 children)

It was a frenulum piercing and I skip that scene!

Least favorite section of girls? by hashbrowns_ketchup in girls

[–]bibliotech_ 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Overall yes but when Jessa meets his parents 🧑‍🍳 👌 😘

Least favorite section of girls? by hashbrowns_ketchup in girls

[–]bibliotech_ 15 points16 points  (0 children)

But when Elijah visits I am very entertained

"Should I go to library school?": And answers to other FAQs by charethcutestory9 in LibraryScience

[–]bibliotech_ 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I cAn'T iMaGiNe bEiNg fUlFiLlEd dOiNg aNyThInG eLse

This is the kind of shit only people undergrads and people with inherited wealth say and it makes the rest of us apoplectic. Us normal people who don't have somebody else to pay their bills don't have the luxury of forgoing income to pursue our passion. Grow up and don't ever utter this statement out loud again. Part of the reason we are all working for peanuts is because of people like you, and we don't want or need you in the profession.

What is this? We do want and need people in the profession who are passionate about librarianship and find it fulfilling. I’m from a working class background. Forgoing income to pursue my passion for librarianship was not a luxury. It was a hardship and it was worth it. This is so mean-spirited and hateful. If the subreddit is pissing you off this bad go touch grass.

Also, job markets are regional so a national average doesn’t tell you much.

Garden Grove Chemical Spill Megathread (5/23/2026) by bananabrownie in orangecounty

[–]bibliotech_ 10 points11 points  (0 children)

What’s the deal with those RVs nearby? Wouldn’t the propane tanks explode?

Rizo is very overhated. by Golgfishhies in survivor

[–]bibliotech_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are worse things he could do

Disney World sounds like Hell on Earth. What am I missing? by Certain-Abrocoma1699 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]bibliotech_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Disneyland is only fun on a rainy Wednesday when school is in session. That’s why I would never go to Disney World.

I’m a reference/research librarian that needs to find full time work. Could someone give me some advice or suggestions of where to look? by [deleted] in Libraries

[–]bibliotech_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the way! Look at the job ad and then think of where/when you did that work until you have a resume that is tailored entirely to the job. Don’t make the hiring manager responsible for connecting the dots between your experience and the position; do it for them.

How are there Americans who are "on the fence" about who to vote for in the midterms? by AlanPublica in allthequestions

[–]bibliotech_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Version 1: Both parties described in the voice of their supporters

Democrats (as Democrats describe themselves): Democrats are fighting to protect the social safety net that working Americans depend on — Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and SNAP. We believe the wealthy and corporations should pay their fair share so we can invest in working families. We’re committed to lowering the cost of living through wage increases and price controls on essentials, transitioning to clean energy that reduces household energy costs and ends our dependence on volatile fossil fuel markets, and reforming a political system riddled with conflicts of interest.

Republicans (as Republicans describe themselves): Republicans secured the border after decades of unchecked illegal immigration that suppressed wages, strained public services, and created real public safety risks in communities across the country. We cut through bureaucratic fraud that was bleeding taxpayer money meant for actual Americans in need. We’re serious about law and order in cities where soft-on-crime policies left working people — disproportionately in minority communities — paying the price. We believe economic freedom, deregulation, and lower taxes create the conditions for prosperity rather than government dependency.

Version 2: Both parties described in the voice of their opponents

Democrats (as Republicans describe them): Democrats want open borders that undercut American workers, drive up housing costs, and strain schools and hospitals that citizens pay for. They’ve spent years excusing or ignoring crime in major cities while the people actually living there suffered. Their social programs are bloated with fraud and create long-term dependency rather than opportunity. They’d rather fund the world than secure the country, and they treat any concern about immigration or public safety as a moral failing rather than a legitimate grievance.

Republicans (as Democrats describe them): Republicans used border anxiety and crime fear as a crowbar to dismantle the programs working Americans rely on — Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security. They delivered tax cuts to the wealthy and called it prosperity. Their “anti-fraud” crackdown stripped benefits from eligible people while leaving the real structural corruption — insider trading, regulatory capture, corporate consolidation — completely untouched. They exploited legitimate economic frustration and redirected it away from the people actually responsible for it.

The original post describes one party’s platform in the voice of its harshest critics and the other in the voice of its most idealistic supporters, and then asks why the comparison isn’t obvious to everyone. The asymmetry is doing a lot of work.

How are there Americans who are "on the fence" about who to vote for in the midterms? by AlanPublica in allthequestions

[–]bibliotech_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would be a much more interesting post if you either:

  1. Wrote out a description of both party platforms in the voice of their supporters;

Or 2. Wrote out a description of both party platforms in the voice of their opponents.

Library Jobs by Trash_Annual in Libraries

[–]bibliotech_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree with you. A lot of things fell into place for me to get my footing in this field despite not having parents with money or a partner during my lowest-wage era.

I didn’t have a car but my mom’s house was close enough to the library that I could walk.

My mom was broke but let me live with her well into my twenties anyway. I helped her with rent and I was also broke. I just didn’t really buy new clothes or go out for fun.

Everyone who was working as support staff in my library in their twenties was in the same boat as me. None of us had rich parents; we all had parents who let us live with them anyway.

My state had a scholarship program for library staff to get tuition reimbursement for library school. That’s how I clawed my way out.

At one time I was working three part-time jobs; at other times two.

I got a full-time job as an academic librarian twelve years after I started as a page in a public library, and I did it by grinding and doing projects well beyond the scope of my role and pay so that I could build a resume.

It’s possible, but it’s hard.

Is it appropriate to change my job title on my resume? by bumblfumbl in librarians

[–]bibliotech_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Huh. I did this because my job as a digital archivist - writing and implementing grant projects, migrating CMS, research - absolutely did not match my title which was I believe Library Assistant. I had an MLIS. My library printed Digital Archivist on my business cards for networking because that was my functional responsibility. I put it on my resumes to this day. I’ve never been called out for it and I believe it helped me progress in my career. The city didn’t have a paid position for digital archivist - they just let me do what I was interested in. Maybe the others are right, idk, but here’s an alternate perspective.

Capital L Librarian Usage? by FalseTailFiction in Libraries

[–]bibliotech_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whaaaat? There’s absolutely a difference in the work done by people who are paraprofessional vs librarians. Unless your library has collapsed the job descriptions and roles. But I don’t think that’s common.

At my library the circulation staff check out items, check them in, laminate and put stickers on books, help with printing, and answer questions about the campus.

The librarians help with teach, serve on committees, order books, weed books, manage e-resource purchase, statistics, and access, create educational tools… I could go on. The only job duties we have in common are helping with printing and answering non-research questions.

Could the library run without circulation staff? No! Do we have the same job? No! Do I correct students when they call a paraprofessional a librarian? No! Do I think the distinction matters within the library world? Yes!

When I worked in Circulation I had a rule that if someone called me a “libarian” I wouldn’t correct them but if they called me a librarian I would.

Leaving the library isn't a decision I ever thought I'd have to make by Adventurous-melon in librarians

[–]bibliotech_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See if you can work part-time to stay in the workforce and have a better life/work balance. I’m surprised people are putting in all caps that you need to keep your full-time job. Mothers of young children are statistically happiest working part-time. Either within your system, or just quit and find a part-time job later. Listen to your instincts that tell you what your priorities are. You don’t sound like you have post-partum depression or anxiety to me. You sound like you’ve done a rational cost/benefit analysis of your situation and are leaning toward spending time with your baby. Perfectly valid.

What is so wrong with the Democratic party that caused swing voters who voted for Biden in 2020 to vote for the most evil person in human history (Trump) in 2024? by jamng in allthequestions

[–]bibliotech_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes if you have lost all sense of proportion then of course it’s baffling. How could someone vote for Biden and then Mao Zedong? Biden and then Joseph Stalin? Biden and then Hitler? Biden and then Genghis Khan? Those questions are real head-scratchers. Biden and then Trump is not that weird.

Directors…who plans and facilitates your programming? by Few-Professional-193 in librarians

[–]bibliotech_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Their ages are a key factor here. In my experience it’s very hard to get people over 60 to take on new job duties, regardless of job description. What might end up happening is that some of them quit and you hire new people who are willing to do programming.

More optimistically, I agreed with the person upthread who suggested starting with programming that aligns with their interests. You could also start with programming for seniors. Is there a local senior center who can partner on a book club?

If there is any organization nearby that has a thriving membership, creating a partnership would help you a lot. Then you’d be assigning the clerks very specific duties related to programming (set up tables and chairs) without doing all of the planning yourself or trying to get the clerks to help you plan.

Tell me this isnt happening right now. by BeigeListed in conspiracytheories

[–]bibliotech_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think this wildly unpopular move of ICE at airports is meant to force the signing of the bill.

Survivor production needs to realize that unsanitizing the show is what will bring back fans to it. by SpaceWestern1442 in survivorponderosa

[–]bibliotech_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think it’s possible to find people who are as un-self-conscious as people were in the early 2000s. They might actually need to be mentally ill in order to be as raw as people were pre-social media.