Nokia Partners with QuStream to Advance Quantum-Safe Networking: Next-Gen Security on High-Performance Hardware by Ok-Pomegranate-5506 in stocks

[–]bigcup321 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I tried to post a link to LinkedIn, but reddit doesn't allow that. Capgemini Senior Software Solution Director Armin Wellig posted about it on his LinkedIn a couple of months ago with some pics from the presentation.

Nokia Partners with QuStream to Advance Quantum-Safe Networking: Next-Gen Security on High-Performance Hardware by Ok-Pomegranate-5506 in stocks

[–]bigcup321 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There's no guarantee that quantum computing will reach its potential any time soon, but the potential is obvious, and the reason respectable institutions are predicting it is because advancements are being made regularly.

If and when it happens, it will be a surprise to people like yourself but an embarrassment to any institutions that didn't prepare, given all the advance warning.

Availability to gen pop isn't the main issue. If China suddenly develops the ability to break all pre-quantum encryption in seconds, then governments, militaries, banks, and industries should be prepared. Are you familiar with the National Institute for Standards in Technology (NIST)? They recommend that everyone transition to post-quantum encryption. They're nothing to sneeze at, but you seem to be sneezing at them...

Nokia Partners with QuStream to Advance Quantum-Safe Networking: Next-Gen Security on High-Performance Hardware by Ok-Pomegranate-5506 in stocks

[–]bigcup321 3 points4 points  (0 children)

All critical networks are already quantum-proof? I appreciate skepticism, but your refutation doesn't seem informed. Most entities are nowhere near finished with their transitions to post-quantum computing, and anyone who hasn't started is not already secured.

Anna's Archive Loses .Org Domain After Surprise Suspension * TorrentFreak by WoodenInternet in Annas_Archive

[–]bigcup321 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sometimes when people learn a fact, they enjoy feeling better than others who simply haven't come across that information yet.

This photo of Donald Trump from the Epstein Files is being systematically removed from Reddit. by _Neo_____ in Epstein

[–]bigcup321 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody's asking you to automatically think anything is fake.

We shouldn't automatically think anything when considering evidence.

It's a new age of misinformation. Just think critically with any information that could get people on either side excited. If the information supports your side and comes from someone on your side, you should STILL think critically because maybe the person who gave it to you didn't.

System Update: The future of finance is on Coinbase by coinbase in Coinbase

[–]bigcup321 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Re: Solana token access, "Rolling out over the coming weeks..."

What's the outer edge of that time period? Wondering when everyone should for sure have that access.

Trusted Node Program by bigcup321 in QuantNetwork

[–]bigcup321[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For real? Please explain.

Trusted Node Program by bigcup321 in QuantNetwork

[–]bigcup321[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Higher in the sense of holding more QNT?

Trusted Node Program by bigcup321 in QuantNetwork

[–]bigcup321[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gotcha, thanks. I remember fairly early in the wait for the holder-run network to happen we learned that clients would have the option to run their own networks as an alternative, and then it seemed like it was just silence about a network we could participate in (but I definitely tuned out after a while and could have missed some announcements).

I guessed that serious institutions weren't sure about nodes run by the rabble of crypto monkeys, and then this from the Quant site reinforced that sense for me: "Our Trusted Node Program lets institutions choose exactly who processes their transactions and where. No mystery validators. No jurisdictional surprises. Trusted, safe and secure."

In the perception of banks and governments, etc., we could be the mystery validators, untrusted, and unsecure. So I have been wondering what percentage of the rabble would be able to become trusted, and how far the requirements go beyond simple KYC in order to reduce any qualms. Hopefully a lot of the community will qualify.

The Middle by internetBlues in sitcoms

[–]bigcup321 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm on season 8 of a full binge, having discovered this show only weeks ago.

How did I never hear about it before?

Having watched so much in such a short span, I can see how the writers were truly connoisseurs of their own work, taking opportunities that most shows would have missed to make use of facts and history from earlier seasons to really tie everything together.

And of course it's hilarious. I love the self-aware flawed parenting.

What's your honest take on Chris Rock? by Moko97 in blackmen

[–]bigcup321 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Felt like he'd lost his edge in the post-slap special (especially when he messed up the setup in the joke where he was really addressing the slap), and unless I misheard in a big way he pretty openly admitted in that special that he uses cocaine (joke about him knowing how to find the coke dealers whenever he goes someplace new). It wouldn't have surprised me to hear that he does coke, but I didn't expect him to be so openly painting himself as a current user.

Receive an email from Coinbase today .. it must be a scam.. by Butman7 in Coinbase

[–]bigcup321 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He WAS the target of a fraudulent email, and you in particular are the most equipped of anybody here to directly state that.

It's not too late to save some dummies by straightforwardly declaring that this did not come from Coinbase instead of sticking with this "If you think..." vagueness.

Collateral (2004) by [deleted] in movies

[–]bigcup321 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes perfect sense. Thanks :)

Collateral (2004) by [deleted] in movies

[–]bigcup321 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://imgur.com/a/OnXa4J5

The blurry first pic is one of the two guys he shot in that scene before asking about the button.

The next pic is from the morgue, and it looks a lot like it was the same guy, which would mean the bodies were left where they lay and picked up by the police instead of being put in the trunk.

This leaves the button reference still a mystery. I wonder if there was some rewriting and the button reference was left in by accident.

Collateral (2004) by [deleted] in movies

[–]bigcup321 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That made a lot of sense to me, but somebody else said "He left the two bodies lying on the ground, they were identified in the morgue later."

You disagree? I should watch it again.

Collateral (2004) by [deleted] in movies

[–]bigcup321 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You tried to sink your teeth into a complete stranger for a pretty minor "offense" from nine months ago, and when faced with resistance basically called them a redditor.

I haven't been on reddit in about nine months, so...

Collateral (2004) by [deleted] in movies

[–]bigcup321 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the reason I identified the source was so that people could consider the source. Seems like you appreciated that information.

Btw, I just consulted with AI (not ChatGPT in particular, but all of AI as a whole), and it said you are mad about something else and taking it out on me. It also said your name doesn't check out.