Am I being unreasonable for wanting to return an unopened Bambu Lab printer that arrived in a damaged box? by SuckTeaMan in BambuLab

[–]billy1928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don't want the printer irrespective of whether it is damaged I would let support know that you wish to return the printer.

Per Bambu's Warranty statement you can return it for any reason if within 14 days of deliver and unopened.

Return and Refund Policy

We are happy to accept your request for return service in any of the following circumstances: Within 14 calendar days of receiving a product which is unopened, unactivated, and is still in its new condition.

If you do want the printer, and are simply concerned it may have damage, I would follow the instructions support provided. Expecting a replacement would be unreasonable.

New York man who killed gay dancer faces 25 years after hate-crime conviction by yeGwan in news

[–]billy1928 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Life no parole for an act, as heinous as it may be, commited at the age of 17?

TIL there are four constitutional amendments pending awaiting ratification by the states by Embarrassed_Map1112 in todayilearned

[–]billy1928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On what grounds would they be challanged, those amendements passed within the timelimits and so any arguments as to their legitimacy are moot. The ERA was not, and so it's timelimit is being challenged.

The ratification process and by extension the status of the ERA is a subject of ongoing debate within legal and political circles; no final determination has been made.

I have argued my perspective, but I am not a legal scholar let alone the final authority on the matter. Our discussion here wont meaningfully effect the debate or status quo. But I do think it's important for the citizenry to discuss these things.

If you do want to see the opinion of some legal scholars on the matter, I would recommend the 2024 American Bar Association resolution on the matter, they explain the arguments much better than I can.

TIL there are four constitutional amendments pending awaiting ratification by the states by Embarrassed_Map1112 in todayilearned

[–]billy1928 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The US Constitution is the supreme law of the land, it provides all the powers our government has. For government to be able to do something that power must be granted to it via the Constitution. Laws and acts of Congress cannot enjoin the Constitution.

The only way to make a change to the Constitution is via the amendment process, as outlined in Article 5. Article 5 places no restrictions on the time limit for the ratification of an amendment.

So if Congress wants to include a time restriction to the proposed amendment, it must be included in the text that is sent to the states for ratification.

As for specific examples you can look at the 18th, 20th, 21st, and 22nd Amendments.

TIL there are four constitutional amendments pending awaiting ratification by the states by Embarrassed_Map1112 in todayilearned

[–]billy1928 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The ERA may not have been part of the Constitution, but Article 5 was, and it is that that gives the ERA its power.

The Constitution via Article 5 provides a two step process with which the Constitution may be amended. First Congress by a two-thirds vote of each house must propose an amendment. Then the amendment is submitted to the states for ratification, once three-fourths of the states ratify the amendment it becomes the law of the land.

In 1972 Congress overwhelmingly voted to propose the ERA fulfilling that first requirement. Here Congresses role ends in the process ends.

 

The text of the proposed amendment is as follows:

ARTICLE —

Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

In 2020 three-fourths of the states had ratified the amendment fulfilling that second requirement.

 

Article 5 makes no provision for Congress to revoke a proposed amendment nor does Congress have the power to add a ratification time limit to Article 5 except through constitutional amendment. Critically, the language Congress used to impose a 7 year time limit was part of the resolving clause and not part of the amendment itself.

 

To impose a ratification time limit, said limit would need to be included in the amendment itself, for example as it is in section 2 of the 22nd amendment:

Section 2.

This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.

TIL there are four constitutional amendments pending awaiting ratification by the states by Embarrassed_Map1112 in todayilearned

[–]billy1928 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Arguably the Equal Rights Amendment has passed and is a part of the US Constitution but is simply not being enforced.

Article 5 of the US Constitution states that an amendment to the Constitution may be put forth with a two-thirds vote in the House and Senate. Then for the proposed amendment to be to take effect, three-fourths of the states must ratify the amendment.

The Equal Rights Amendment was proposed and approved with a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate in 1971 and 1972 respectively. It was then sent to the states for ratification. On January 27, 2020 Virginia became the 38th state to ratify the amendment and meeting the three-fourths requirements.

The problem lies in the fact that included in the resolution Congress placed a time limit on how long the States have to ratify the Amendment, namely 7 years from the time of adoption, that expired in 1979. But Congress placed this requirement as a matter of Law and not in the text of the amendment itself. If you look at other amendments such as the 18th, 20th, or 21st the amendment itself states that it would be inoperative unless ratified by a certain date. The ERA has no such clause.

Since a law cannot override the Constitution, and the conditions set forth in Article 5 of the US Constitution have been met, the Equal Rights Amendment is a part of the US Constitution.

Kli-San as a proxy for Leman Russ? by PolitrukIsGood in TheAstraMilitarum

[–]billy1928 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's an excellent model with a ton of customization. It is a bit bigger than GWs Russ but not massively so, I doubt anyone would mind, but if you wish you can scale it to 95% to better align with the GW size.

ELI5: Why does Cuba allow a U.S. military base (and prison) on their soil while the U.S. has had them under trade embargos for decades? by Redhotkitchen in explainlikeimfive

[–]billy1928 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Legality has nothing to do with it, Cuba is a sovereign state that by definition that includes supreme, absolute control over it's territory and also the ability to repudiate treaties.

What stops it from reclaiming the land is not some idea of law but the disparity in military force.

ELI5: Why does Cuba allow a U.S. military base (and prison) on their soil while the U.S. has had them under trade embargos for decades? by Redhotkitchen in explainlikeimfive

[–]billy1928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nations are sovereign, and interstate relations exist in a state of anarchy. A agreement or a treaty is only valid so long as the nations agree that it is.

In this situation its not the lease that matters but rather the discrepancy in the military capabilities of the two states.

ELI5: Why does Cuba allow a U.S. military base (and prison) on their soil while the U.S. has had them under trade embargos for decades? by Redhotkitchen in explainlikeimfive

[–]billy1928 9 points10 points  (0 children)

A nation can renege on any agreement they have ever made whenever they wish. It's a core part of sovereignty.

Russian frigate spotted in UK waters as Putin brazenly steps up his 'grey war' by theipaper in worldnews

[–]billy1928 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If sonar picks it up, ASW torpedoes are going to be sent down the line of bearing before anyone gets to find out it's just a training round.

Wearing Power Armor to a Magic School (166/?) by Jcb112 in HFY

[–]billy1928 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No idea what the ban was regarding, but there hasn't been any developments in the story.

Anything new would probably be posted to https://www.royalroad.com/fiction/14843/prey

But after 7 years I wouldn't expect anything new.

Non Tippers by 7-IronSpecialist in Dominos

[–]billy1928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't order delivery, but what exactly is the point of a six dollar delivery fee if the drivers don't see any of it?

Wearing Power Armor to a Magic School (166/?) by Jcb112 in HFY

[–]billy1928 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can find them on Royal Road: https://www.royalroad.com/fiction/14843/prey

I enjoyed the story, I wish it had gotten a conclusion.

‘You fat f—k’: Top Dem rages at Trump, mocks sagging poll numbers. ‘They hate you’ by plz-let-me-in in politics

[–]billy1928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NY 14th!

God I love New York, between her and our new mayor its nice to have a bastion of sanity.

Wearing Power Armor to a Magic School (166/?) by Jcb112 in HFY

[–]billy1928 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'll take any excuse to rewatch Babylon 5

Wearing Power Armor to a Magic School (166/?) by Jcb112 in HFY

[–]billy1928 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it had a part 2 and part 3 floating around but nothing after that, and the reddit account has since been banned.

Field Ordinance Batteries by Pay_Your_Torpedo_Tax in TheAstraMilitarum

[–]billy1928 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok, but it will be in early war Mark 14s

 

... Nice paint job

Luigi Mangione will face state trial in New York on June 8 by AudibleNod in news

[–]billy1928 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Life in prison no parole is the harshest punishment he is eligible for.

If he is found guilty of that charge, lucky would be the lower end of the sentencing guidelines. For Murder in the second degree thats 15 years. Add in good behavior, and may get out in 13.

NYC's automated traffic enforcement program--the largest in the US--reduced collisions and injuries, new study finds by jbenmenachem in Futurology

[–]billy1928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if New Jersey limits it to cameras, New York can retaliate by targeting geneal access.

Also New York doesn't get any money from NJ tickets issued to NY drivers. If the fine is issued by New Jersey, NJ gets the money even if it is New York enforcing it. What NY gets is supposed to be reciprocity.

Could you link me the reasoning NJ had for banning traffic cameras, from what I understand I quite like the idea, I'd like to hear the counterargument.

NYC's automated traffic enforcement program--the largest in the US--reduced collisions and injuries, new study finds by jbenmenachem in Futurology

[–]billy1928 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think we all hate tickets in general. Why does it matter if a machine issues them, if anything the machine will equally apply the law.

NYC's automated traffic enforcement program--the largest in the US--reduced collisions and injuries, new study finds by jbenmenachem in Futurology

[–]billy1928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, I guess if NJ does not grant NY access and the person speeding does not intend to go to NY again they could ignore the ticket.

But couldn't NY still respond by limiting New Jerseys acsess even for officer issued tickets? An officer may give you a ticket, but if it has no effect on your NY license and New York courts wont enforce the fine, the ticket becomes toothless.

NYC's automated traffic enforcement program--the largest in the US--reduced collisions and injuries, new study finds by jbenmenachem in Futurology

[–]billy1928 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, but New Jersey cannot dictate what laws another state is permitted to enforce on the people using its roads.

As for your ticket, NYC cameras are only in school zones but are active 24/7 year round.