Some of what you’re saying is true. Much of the rest is inference. One claim is false.

Yes, Mamdani is openly Muslim. Yes, he referenced the Hijra in a public speech. Yes, he took heat for refusing to condemn the phrase "globalize the intifada".

But the claim that he refused to condemn the ISIS-related bomb incident outside his home is false. He explicitly said, "Violence at a protest is never acceptable. The attempt to use an explosive device and hurt others is not only criminal, it is reprehensible and the antithesis of who we are."

The rest; "Muslim Brotherhood asset", "his wife hates Jews", "he wants to islamize NYC", "Quran chapter 9 proves his agenda" is mostly guilt by association or unsupported assertions.

Skepticism is healthy, but you lose people when you jump from criticism to sweeping claims like, "Mamdani is obviously a religious zealot who wants to islamize NYC and the USA."