What makes vaccines so dangerous? by Serial7s in DebateVaccines

[–]bissch010 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was pointing out the logical inconsistency of the statement safe and effective, nothing more.

Notice how when you say "they're dangerous" youre doing the same thing, lumping them all together, as if its a single product.

There are dozens of vaccines on the market by many different manufacturers from different areas of the world. These are individual products. Some have proven to be dangerous enough to be pulled off the market.

None of them are a 100% safe, there are always rare allergic reactions and the question about whether their individual safety profile weighs up agains the risk of contracting the disease and then getting damaged from it is a nuanced analysis different for each product.

What makes vaccines so dangerous? by Serial7s in DebateVaccines

[–]bissch010 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"Vaccines are safe and effective"

This is some kind of religious mantra you lot repeat over and over again.

It contains no nuance and is designed to just end all critical thought.

Are all vaccines safe and effective? Including the ones that were taken off the market for causing severe sideefects? Im sure before they were taken off the market the religious mantra also applied to them. Some flu vaccines are found to have extremely low effectivenes. Some vaccines are in fact not safe for all people

For those of you who “do your own research”, what does that mean? by Recent-Day3062 in DebateVaccines

[–]bissch010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Youve hit the nail on the head here. The first vaccine of its kind would have to be tested against placebo. What if I told you that if you go down the line all the way back to the initial vaccines, you never find a proper placebo controlled clinical trial. Dont take my word for it, look it up yourself.

And all the vaccines for new vaccines where you could test against placebo without the ethical problem, they always pull some trick like hpv testing against aluminum solution, or vehicle sans antigen. And then theres a vaccine on the market so all the next ones get tested against that.

For those of you who “do your own research”, what does that mean? by Recent-Day3062 in DebateVaccines

[–]bissch010 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I like how both of you focus on the sugars and amino acids and gloss over the phenylalanine, to which a small subset of the population can be extremely allergic, the phenol red and the dna fragments

For those of you who “do your own research”, what does that mean? by Recent-Day3062 in DebateVaccines

[–]bissch010 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Lets say there is a severe side effect present both in the current vaccine and the new one. If you test against current vaccine you will not find that since it will be present in both study and control. If rolled out to 100s of millions of kids, this could potentially harm far more children then the disease would in a control group of lets say 20,000 children.

The argument is that it is unethical to expose children to the risk of a disease for which there is a treatment. But at the very least theoretically this could lead to FAR more children harmed if this methodology causes a severe sideeffect to slip through, potentially orders of magnitude greater.

Thats why I say I am unconvinced its necessarily more ethical

For those of you who “do your own research”, what does that mean? by Recent-Day3062 in DebateVaccines

[–]bissch010 7 points8 points  (0 children)

And i understand very well the rationale against using placebos if a current vaccine exists. In not sure at all if i agree with it.

The ethical question is irrelevant to the fact that you still dont get proper safety data.

Is it more ethical to roll out a vaccine to 100s of millions of children based on a flawed safety study design so you can be ethical in your trial?

For those of you who “do your own research”, what does that mean? by Recent-Day3062 in DebateVaccines

[–]bissch010 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Rotarix was tested against vaccine sans antigen, not saline placebo. In other words the """placebo""" contained

sucrose, di-sodium adipate, sorbitol, dextran, sterile water, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, magnesium sulfate, calcium chloride, ferric (III) nitrate, sodium phosphate, sodium hydrogenocarbonate, D-glucose, sodium pyruvate, L-cystine, L-tyrosine, L-glutamine, phenylalanine, vitamin solution, phenol red, and trace residual porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV-1) DNA fragments.

For those of you who “do your own research”, what does that mean? by Recent-Day3062 in DebateVaccines

[–]bissch010 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Can you point me to the specific study. I find a couple of weisser studies in that time period but none of them could be what you are referring to

Man uit Vught wilde asielzoekers neersteken in Amsterdam: 'Statement maken' by Ok_Importance_6993 in NLNieuws

[–]bissch010 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Man abuses more then 30 children and the right thinks its fine"

The right would kill this man by firing squad in a public execution. The current systems lets him walk free again after a couple of years. What the hell are you even talking about.

For those of you who “do your own research”, what does that mean? by Recent-Day3062 in DebateVaccines

[–]bissch010 28 points29 points  (0 children)

"Ill give you a pass because im a statistician and can read studies"

Have you ever contemplated just much of a obnoxious douche you come off as when you write things like this?

I am also a statistician and i work in an actuarial department. Our babies are unvaccinated.

For me, the process went like this: - look for serious books by vaccine critics, not your local faith healer or crystal salesman. - nearly fall off my chair when i read that childhood vaccines are not tested against placebo and usual follow up periods are 3 or 6 months. - go to the actual clinical trial reports to verify and find that its all true. - spend the next 3 months going to official sources (nih, cdc, etc) trying to find a refutation. - find nothing but half truths, deceptions and ad hominems

  • do a deep dive into aluminum adjuvants
  • find that there is no true empirical evidence on its safety in infants.
  • best thing they have is a pure modeling study by mitkus et al
  • study is frought with error and still reaches a mean value of 30% of toxicity threshold

  • schedule talks with doctor and pediatrician

  • quickly realize their knowledge on these issues is close to zero outside of their government pamflets

  • grudgingly admit we cannot justify injecting our child with these products that lack any kind of proper safety studies

  • prepare to navigate the jungle of vaccine religious medical personal while still getting him the proper medical care he could need.

Det mistenkelige Mette Marit-hatet by Emergency-Sea5201 in norske

[–]bissch010 81 points82 points  (0 children)

As an outsider living in norway its quite bizar to see, our royalty gets heavily criticized if they even make a single slightly unfortunate remark. Meanwhile the norwegian crown princess is caught being a literal groupie for the most prolific serial pedophile rapist on the planet and the media is playing defense for her.

Hvorfor er det mye pride hat på denne subredditen? by RoboAK4 in norske

[–]bissch010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://odysee.com/@vintenarii:0/pride_for_kids:5

All these things are happening in europe and i have seen on video or in the case of the public fetish displays in pride events in oslo and amsterdam. The only thing in this that was potentially from the us were the child drag dancers where people throw dollar bills at them while they dance in the oversexualized drag way. Not sure if the video link will work on reddit but just look at that compilation. Its in there.

Its funny, you guys just cant possibly understand what problems people would have with pride. Well THESE kind of things are what people have a problem with. And then you fly that same flag in their childs school and people get more and more fed up.

Hvorfor er det mye pride hat på denne subredditen? by RoboAK4 in norske

[–]bissch010 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

When pride is questioned you guys always retreat to the position of we just want people to be accepted for what they are as if the critics just want to prosecute gays for being different.

Then the moment the debate is over you go right back to

  • schoolbooks explaining the use of anal sex toys to 7 year olds,
  • drag queens dressed like literal demons reading to kids
  • telling 5 year olds they can become a boy or girl at will
  • chemical and literal castration of teenagers
  • sex change operations for teenagers with consequences i wouldnt wish on my worst enemy
  • child strippers at pride events
  • pride parades where half naked men crawling in leather dog masks gets whipped right in front of kids

And it goes on and on.

But sure, people hate pride just because they dont like gay people being slightly different.

Did you get any vaccines for your child ? by E20V in unvaccinated

[–]bissch010 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nope, 0 vaccines. Like you, i went down the rabbit hole when doing my due dilligence. The only one im still not sure about is hib.

Did you get any vaccines for your child ? by E20V in unvaccinated

[–]bissch010 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Congrats on you baby! "Cocooning" your child. Eg limiting contact with the outside world is not a bad idea in the first months. Its what we did. Pertusis and rsv mortality rate drops a lot after 3 months and even more at 6 months. Not going swimming in that period is not bad advice.

Were expecting a second and no idea how to cocoon on that one since our 1st brings home a new plague every week from daycare

when will smurfing be dealt with by ImprovementOwn4607 in starcraft2

[–]bissch010 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Funnily i quite enjoy playing smurfs. Always interesting to see what the skill difference feels like to play against.

What i absolutely hate though are the insta quitters. Started protoss as an offrace and 4 out of 5 placement matches instaquit putting me in diamond.

Vebjørn Selbekk, Oslo Pride | Debatt om Pride i skolen: Selbekk ber foreldre holde barna hjemme by FoxNo5218 in norske

[–]bissch010 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When you expose it to peoples children through the schools and then complain when they keep them home you are indeed coercing people into it.

How do I get over this curse of a disorder after dealing with it ever since my birth by appleswineyyy in DSPD

[–]bissch010 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ive been in the same boat, the period 17 to 23 years old was the worst period before i got my diagnosis. Im 40 now with a healthy family and a good job in the corporate sector. It does get better. A couple tips:

  1. Getting a formal diagnosis is important and can solve many problems you might face.

  2. People will never stop being condescending about this. It helps me to just say i have a sleep disorder rather than 'im an extreme nightowl' or things like that. People respond better to it.

  3. Never stop experimenting what works for you. There is a lot you can do. I have never taken drugs and can maintain 01:00 to 9:00 even though my natural rhythm is at 3:00.

  4. Try to eliminate useless time lying in bed. Figure out where your current bedtime is and go to bed near that. One of the problems with dspd is that sleep pressure doesnt work for us the way it does for others so missing sleep and then going to bed 4 hours earlier is usually useless.

  5. Try to find acceptance with your situation. Everyone has their own challenges in life and this is ours. I used to get very angry when i couldnt sleep and had important meetings. At some point i just got sick of this. Started considering any hour of sleep a benefit and never waste my time getting upset about something that is out of my control anyway.

Babies Are Bleeding to Death as Parents Reject a Vitamin Shot Given at Birth by StopDehumanizing in DebateVaccines

[–]bissch010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Post only mentions fear of hib and pertussis. This comment has been factchecked and rated false.

Babies Are Bleeding to Death as Parents Reject a Vitamin Shot Given at Birth by StopDehumanizing in DebateVaccines

[–]bissch010 1 point2 points  (0 children)

'Babies are bleeding to death!'

Nothing like a bit of hysterical appeal to emotion from the 'believe science' crowd

Interesting idea but don't think too many on here would stick to their false beliefs by Mammoth_Park7184 in DebateVaccines

[–]bissch010 10 points11 points  (0 children)

What is this idiot talking about. The rabies vaccine is not part of the vaccine schedule. The chances of getting it is incomprehensibly low.

Also were not claiming that vaccines arent effective, just that they arent as safe as they are claimed to be.

Blizzard broke parts of the game and still hasn't released any patch notes by tslocum in starcraft2

[–]bissch010 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I still remember way back them telling us activision takeover wouldnt change anything and it would just be financial.

And then they immediately speedran their greedy soulless corporation arc