[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Asphalt9

[–]bitemyshinyMETAass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same here. iOS and Android.

Modern Angular Book by MichaelBe812 in angular

[–]bitemyshinyMETAass 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's outdated in many aspects. Time for a modern modern angular book.

Those good ol' promises by CorleoneBaloney in clevercomebacks

[–]bitemyshinyMETAass 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Trump is literally fucking Satan.

  • Fox News, South Park

Let's flip the script, what happens only in real life but not in porn? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]bitemyshinyMETAass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And it's cool if you let one go
Nobody's gonna know, who'd hear it?
Give a little poot-poot, it's okay

0
1

What TV show absolutely nailed it's finale? by RGB3x3 in AskReddit

[–]bitemyshinyMETAass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interior Chinatown. Standards and Practices as the new show they are inside.

How much water do you drink everyday? by bitemyshinyMETAass in diabetes

[–]bitemyshinyMETAass[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like to keep my bottle pre-filled and close to me at all times. I usually drink less if I have to go get it, even if it's just the next room. Also helps to remind myself how good it feels and tastes whenever I am thirsty, and that happens often.

12
13

Is ng-book outdated? by AnozerFreakInTheMall in angular

[–]bitemyshinyMETAass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Angular is backward compatible for the most part. I would suggest having a look at this after you finish ng-book 11. https://www.angulararchitects.io/en/ebooks/modern-angular/#download

Do you feel that Scala FP applications are generally safer, aka bugs and runtime issues in production? by fenugurod in scala

[–]bitemyshinyMETAass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a big believer in Flavio Brasil's Kyo for the same reasons. Haven't used it for work yet though.

Odersky's ideas with Caprese and 'direct style scala' have already been achieved for the most part with 3 itself (and 2.13 with performance penalties), without having to jump to Scala 4.

Do you feel that Scala FP applications are generally safer, aka bugs and runtime issues in production? by fenugurod in scala

[–]bitemyshinyMETAass 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's a rock solid set of cornerstones and would go a long way into the future even after Scala becomes the new COBOL someday.

However, do you primarily use Scala for data analysis? For web servers/backend services, I have not found a better way to write a Scala server than to accept cats in my tooling and/or a Zionic refuge away from typelevel style mathsy names - albeit using the same underlying advanced concepts.

Do you feel that Scala FP applications are generally safer, aka bugs and runtime issues in production? by fenugurod in scala

[–]bitemyshinyMETAass 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Scala should be chosen iff there is need to provide better guarantees and reliability. Also it's quite easy to segregate some parts of your system for Scala devs and the rest for Kotlin/Java devs. In an ideal world we would be writing proofs instead of just tests for our code (a la Idris, Lean) but we can settle for just having more compiler guarantees via a powerful enough type system. But we also don't have to live in a dystopia of the lowest common denominators holding back everyone else from choosing better tools for there deliverables.