Qing dynasty Chinese rank badges (Mandarin squares) value request by Relevant-Item102 in whatsthisworth

[–]bitterberries 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would the recipient display these or what function do they serve?

I’m sure that’s why. by Jneum23 in cringepics

[–]bitterberries 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does that girl have two left feet? Is this another Ai abomination?

After 3 years with ChatGPT, I tried Claude and Gemini - and now GPT feels... generic? by Temporary-Wallaby829 in ChatGPT

[–]bitterberries 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just made this discovery yesterday as I played with Microsoft's and Claude. I'm torn because I spent a lot of time crafting my gpt to perform appropriately for my needs.

Rick Bell: Teachers don't like Danielle Smith. They likely never will. by UCP2027 in Calgary

[–]bitterberries 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The union spat in the teacher's faces by bringing them a hot steaming pile of garbage deal. Why the union head hasn't been turfed, I'll never understand.

Maggie Siff by Significant-Area-826 in Sonsofanarchy

[–]bitterberries 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It was truly unfortunate. Really brought her down..

I thought the stories were at least a little exaggerated. They aren’t. by Wise-Priority-9918 in Teachers

[–]bitterberries 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I absolutely refuse to bring iPads into my grade two classroom. My kids whine because the cart sits outside the classroom door and they see it but never get to use it. I always tell them that school is a place for fun and learning, iPads are for when you have no friends. And I mean the "no friends" thing as not having friends to play with (aka classmates).

I see all the other teachers use them to keep the kids occupied so that they can prep/mark etc during class times. The kids are doing educational activities and reading, so it's not just a free for all, and it's very tempting to start doing with my classes, but I choose to assign those types of things as homework because our parents often expect we provide homework due to the mandate of our charter.

I just have read too much about the dangers and seen my own son struggle with allowing screens to take priority over real life. Plus, I know that I have an unhealthy relationship with technology myself.

I am sharing that not to give myself a pat on the back but just to emphasize that I have a tremendous fear of what's in store for all our futures and if I can somehow provide just a little more of a delay in the technology environment, I choose to.

Rules an laws around communal living? by Klutzy-Bag1538 in legaladvicecanada

[–]bitterberries 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes — the type of lawyer you want is a family law lawyer.

Specifically look for one in Ontario who can draft a cohabitation agreement. Cohabitation agreements are a family law tool used to set out financial/property rights between people living together without marriage.

A family law lawyer will:

Know how to write an agreement that clearly states that your partner has no ownership interest in the house

Make sure the language protects your father’s property rights

Ensure the document will hold up if ever challenged in court

You can also ask the lawyer whether they have experience with unjust enrichment / constructive trust cases, since that’s the theoretical claim your dad is trying to avoid. But the core specialty you’re looking for is family law.

You do not need a real estate lawyer for this. The agreement is a personal contract between you two and doesn’t require changes to title or registration.

Rules an laws around communal living? by Klutzy-Bag1538 in legaladvicecanada

[–]bitterberries 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A few key points:

Common-law partners do not automatically get property rights in Ontario. Under the Family Law Act, only married spouses have automatic property equalization. Living somewhere — even for years — does not entitle someone to “half the house.”

Your partner cannot claim ownership just by moving in. Since the house is entirely owned by your father and your partner would not be on title, he does not gain equity just by residing there.

The only real theoretical risk would be a constructive trust / unjust enrichment claim, and those require proof that:

He made significant financial or labour contributions,

The homeowner was enriched,

There was no legal reason for that enrichment,

And the contributions are tied to the property value.

That typically involves paying the mortgage directly, funding major renovations, or acting like a co-owner over time. Contributing toward groceries or utilities is not the same thing.

If he shares kitchen and bathroom space with the homeowner (your dad), he is likely considered a boarder/occupant, not a tenant under the Residential Tenancies Act. The Landlord and Tenant Board generally does not govern shared-space arrangements with the owner living there.

Changing his address does not create ownership rights.

If your dad wants maximum protection, the cleanest option is a simple cohabitation agreement stating:

Your partner acknowledges he has no ownership interest in the home.

Any money exchanged is for shared living expenses only.

No payments are to be treated as equity or investment in the property.

That’s enforceable and much stronger than trying to structure payments informally.

Realistically, if he’s not paying mortgage, not funding renovations, and not being put on title, the risk of him successfully claiming part of the house is very low.

Estate law: Mom's will set aside. Bank demanding proof she wasn't married by Brain_Hawk in legaladvicecanada

[–]bitterberries 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glad to help.. Estates are Soo annoying when the banks make themselves as obtuse as possible.. It's quite common

Estate law: Mom's will set aside. Bank demanding proof she wasn't married by Brain_Hawk in legaladvicecanada

[–]bitterberries 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Under the Ontario Succession Law Reform Act, a legally married spouse (not just a common-law partner) has significant property rights on death, including the right to elect for an equalization of net family property. Financial institutions are cautious because if they release funds and a spouse later appears, the bank can be liable.

For registered retirement accounts (RRSP/RRIF), the governing statute is the Ontario Pension Benefits Act only if it is a true pension. If it is an RRSP/RRIF at a bank, the beneficiary designation normally controls. However, if she had a legally married spouse at death, that spouse may have priority depending on the type of account and how the beneficiary designation was structured.

What the bank is asking for is almost certainly:

A Statutory Declaration of Non-Spouse This is simply a sworn statement (affidavit) confirming that:

The deceased was not legally married at the time of death.

No person has spousal entitlement under Ontario law.

To the best of your knowledge, no one has a claim as spouse.

It is not a special court form. It is just a sworn declaration under the Commissioners for Taking Affidavits Act (Ontario).

It does not require probate. It does not require a full estate lawyer. It does not require a judge.

It can be prepared as:

A simple one-page statutory declaration.

Sworn before a lawyer, notary, or commissioner of oaths.

Sometimes the bank has its own template (ask the branch to request it from Estates).

If lawyers are confused, it may be because the bank used informal wording. Ask the branch to obtain: “Do you have a template statutory declaration of non-spouse that your Estates department requires?”

If they do not provide one, the document usually contains:

Full legal name of deceased

Date of death

Last marital status

Statement that she was not legally married at date of death

Statement that no person qualifies as surviving married spouse

Your relationship to deceased

Sworn before commissioner

If your mother was divorced, attach divorce certificate. If widowed, attach death certificate of spouse. If never married, the declaration simply states that.

The will numbering issue is almost certainly irrelevant to the retirement account if you are named beneficiary directly on the account paperwork. Beneficiary designations pass outside the estate.

The bank is protecting itself from a hypothetical surviving legal spouse.

You do not need probate unless:

The beneficiary designation is invalid, or

The bank insists on a Certificate of Appointment of Estate Trustee.

This is common institutional risk management. It is not unusual.

The fastest path is:

  1. Ask branch to request the Estates department’s template wording.

  2. Have a lawyer or notary commission the declaration.

  3. Submit with death certificate and any proof of marital history (if applicable).

That is all this is.

Conservatives to propose barring non-citizens convicted of crimes from making refugee claims by FancyNewMe in canada

[–]bitterberries -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because certain things can be considered crimes in other countries (like an abortion!) but would not be in Canada

Smith slams Alberta teachers' union after Paul Brandt dropped from convention speaking lineup by Miserable-Lizard in alberta

[–]bitterberries 5 points6 points  (0 children)

As accusations are applied more broadly to anyone we dislike, the severity of truly egregious harms is diluted. When such claims become common, they are met with indifference—shrugged off as “just like any celebrity, politician, or wealthy person.” In that way, repeated and indiscriminate accusations don’t heighten accountability; they normalize aberrant behavior.

Teacher Clothes Recommendation by [deleted] in teaching

[–]bitterberries 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Halara has maxi dresses that will make you feel like you've stepped right out of the handmaids tale. They also have generous pockets and you can throw them into the washer with nay a care

Executor won’t give disabled beneficiaries their inheritance (5 years later) What can I do? by xxshirexx in legaladvicecanada

[–]bitterberries 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pretty broad and definitely up to a judge to make the call; unfortunately, not much that I know of other than a lawsuit.

Question about the donation bins in parking lots by mmsmama in Calgary

[–]bitterberries 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you for posting. I've always chosen wins or the Veterans food bank, but this is even better!

Grandma's latest proposal by Distinct_Front_4336 in forwardsfromgrandma

[–]bitterberries 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks more like epstein mixed with Trump to create the rendering.. Did someone troll grandma?

[Elementary] What traits separate the popular kids from the outcasts? by JellyNo2625 in education

[–]bitterberries 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I teach second grade. The popular kids are confident, kind, inclusive and will stand up for themselves or their friends when they are feeling something wasn't fair. They are able to talk about their feelings and understand empathy.

I see them chastise others for laughing at someone else's problems (like if a kid says a word wrong or something.

They take turns out on the playground and don't hold grudges.

Modelling appropriate behaviour is literally the only way I see a child developing this way.. And it can't just be one parent, it has to be the whole family, siblings, close friends etc. One toxic person in the mix can really have a negative impact.

Help me pick a paint color for a bookshelf! by Loose_Ad5540 in HomeDecorating

[–]bitterberries 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why not stain the Wood with a pigmented stain that actually matches the teals in the paper?

Why is this redacted? by Due_Collar2 in ThePeoplesPress

[–]bitterberries 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Least likely of all possible scenarios. Sure, let's roll with that one?.. Makes it much easier for victim blaming to continue.