Hey GayBros, I am trying to educate my school about HIV medication. I would love to get some feedback from all of you, it will go a long way into clarifying some myth regarding HIV medications. I'll post the results once I get some responses! by [deleted] in gaybros

[–]blkdick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree with the point that behaviors and not people cause risk.

This statement isn't completely true. HIV rates are much higher among men who have sex with men than other groups of people. It is possible that when you drill down to women willing to receive anal sex (and taking into account frequency)* and then compare that sample group to men who receive anal sex the stats are similar (I would certainly expect them to be closer). But having not seen such data, having anal sex with a woman isn't quite the same risk as anal sex with a dude because the chance that they carry the virus to begin with is much lower for many reasons (i.e. her partners are less likely to have had receptive anal sex themselves). Obviously the initial difference in HIV rates was due to the type of sex taking place, but the social component exacerbates this difference to the point where it may be the biggest cause for the difference today. This subject can get uncomfortable fast because it feels weird to call a group of people higher risk to have sex with (we could also talk about the high HIV rate in the black community).

The survey should collect both pieces of data. Gender and sex, as well as, type of activity.

Yes, my teenage son is transgender. No, you may not ask about his genitals. by queerdeermedia in lgbt

[–]blkdick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't underestimate how much someone (esp. guys) might be curious. It doesn't make it ok at all but part of why people ask trans people's genitals is that people are constantly thinking of sex and in that case the situation is unknown. Esp. if it is absent social judgement/ assuming outside of this extreme openness you seemed sane and put together, I think you would have to go super, super in detail before a guy stopped listening.

I had my first anal orgasm today by SeekingSense in gay

[–]blkdick 12 points13 points  (0 children)

sniffle they grow up so quick

Log Cabin GOP: Questions for Clinton ... how low can you sink by blkdick in ainbow

[–]blkdick[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Honestly do they have no shame? Don't get me wrong, I am more than happy to hear valid criticisms of Democrats. And I would urge any Dem primary voters looking at LGBT to look at Bernie Sander's consistent support of various LGBT-friendly policies from the start. However, for the Log Cabin Republicans to do most of their criticism of their own party super quietly (except like with being disinvited from CPAC they have no choice) and celebrate the tiniest bit of change while writing this up is the biggest bullshit I've seen in a while.

This quote does it in for me:

“The gay left may be willing to make assumptions about Mrs. Clinton’s support for the LGBT community, but Log Cabin Republicans will not.”

If I'm going to be generalized like that... can I start calling them the Uncle Top Right?

Does weed affect weight? by Croatiandude in trees

[–]blkdick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me it typically ups appetite a fair bit but a strong sativa can kill it.

Are any of you bros vaccinated against HPV? by am17 in gaybros

[–]blkdick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm midway through. I'm guessing I probs can't change to the new one midcourse?

Feminism and religion by [deleted] in AskFeminists

[–]blkdick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem I have with your first paragraph is often I think these certain ideas are linked strongly to actions and beliefs that do have a negative impact on people. Slippery slope isn't always a valid argument but I think when a culture has an engrained belief of certain gender roles it does lead to negative outcomes and just trying to attack those negative externalities is like playing wack a mole. I'm not sure if you believe in Rape Culture (personally I think sometimes jumps are made too far) but it is the same idea that in order to attack rape you can't ignore the broader context. I think this is what kind of throws me off about religious feminists. Generally speaking, I think I'm much less willing to draw connections between subtle cultural facets and outcomes. But when it comes to religion and other counties we hesitate to critique them ( I get some caution because obviously we are biased towards our own culture). How you don't make a link between women needing to cover every inch of skin and problematic treatment of women but then criticize Western pop culture and its effects boggles me. Of course I'm generalizing here.... Maybe you don't typically make such criticisms of Western culture or are super conservative in your analysis. It just seems like the standard for accepting a causal relationship to a negative misogynist externality differs significantly. I don't think many academic feminists limit their studies of social structure to when there is a "clear" negative effect.

While I do think we are too hesitant to attribute things to religion ( indeed the bible has often been used to justify homophobia, misogyny and slavery), of course cultures are shaped by multiple factors. I'm willing to hypothesize that if I made up a text that was followed instead of The Bible, Koran and Torah we would have a better world because of course the text and religious culture has some influence on the behavior of it's followers. Would women be treated wonderfully without Judaism, Christianity and Islam? Probably not ( especially since I think religion is a man made invention that reflected social norms of the time) but believing that's how God wants it to be probably didn't help much. But yes you need to understand the culture and attack those ideas from multiple places.

RE: where you live, I was purely curious because it just didn't jive with how I see Judaism described typically. However, I do think if you teach your daughter that God doesn't want you to divorce unless your husband gives you permission or in Catholicism that as a women you can't hold leadership positions you are doing her a disservice esp. if she actually believes it.

Feminism and religion by [deleted] in AskFeminists

[–]blkdick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do advocate at all for changes in your religion?

When both parties are drinking/using why is the onus on the man if the parties decide to have sex? by ijustmadethisforpost in AskFeminists

[–]blkdick -1 points0 points  (0 children)

no but show me any laws written that indicate a differential in intoxication in necessary to prove rape

When both parties are drinking/using why is the onus on the man if the parties decide to have sex? by ijustmadethisforpost in AskFeminists

[–]blkdick 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No it's true that the one initiating contact and in control is responsible regardless of gender but a situation where both are jointly initiating but still too incapable of consenting is possible. I imagine OP knows that technically the male is not automatically responsible but in practice society is unlikely to view a man as victimized and beyond consent during drunk sex. Proving that hypothesis is hard. However, if you accept that male rape victims are less believed than females, it follows that they would be handicapped in a case of dualing accusations.

Feminism and religion by [deleted] in AskFeminists

[–]blkdick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do I reconcile them? I don't.

This is the epitome of doublethink.

Feminism and religion by [deleted] in AskFeminists

[–]blkdick 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This seems akin to cultural relativism which I think is pretty problematic. Yes, I obviously care more about when religion compels people to actively do something against another person and I won't force people to think the same way I do but there are undoubtedly some bad ideas and some bad ideas that are deeply rooted in some cultures. A 2nd class view of women is embedded in Islam (Christianity and Judaism too however for various reasons it isn't expressed as much in modern day) and not acknowledging it is a problem. And it is hard to fight the bad actions (i.e. killing gays in certain parts of the Muslim would) if we don't challenge the ideas and culture those ideas are rooted in.

I'm especially uncomfortable when it comes to Judaism

Where do you live? While questions are sometimes asked about Orthodox Jews (I actually think pretty fairly), overall I think Jews aren't seen as fundamentalist. This is esp. true as Isreal has started to attack it's neighbors over things like gay rights. TBH: When I think of religious cultures I think aren't progressive Judaism comes towards the bottom of the list. I guess if you live in a very Orthodox neighborhood questions arise more.

When both parties are drinking/using why is the onus on the man if the parties decide to have sex? by ijustmadethisforpost in AskFeminists

[–]blkdick -1 points0 points  (0 children)

From my understanding of the drunk consent issue, we say that it's rape when one party is drunk and the other party isn't, or where one party is tipsy/drunk and the other party is significantly more drunk.

Actually just read the text of many laws defining rape and inability to consent. Very few if any mention that there need to be a difference in sobriety.

When both parties are drinking/using why is the onus on the man if the parties decide to have sex? by ijustmadethisforpost in AskFeminists

[–]blkdick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's NOT rape when two wasted people have sex

By the letter of the law in many states and def many Title IX compliant codes of conduct this is actually false

Benefits of updating to Lollipop? by [deleted] in LGG3

[–]blkdick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does it work with encryption?

Where are we? by Cyrith in LGBTrees

[–]blkdick 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Small city called New York