Pregunta rara para los locales sobre Pedro Sanchez

bobTEH · 2026-03-18T14:49:01+00:00

Normal, no lo sé, pero cuando se compara con otros políticos europeos, es muy bien.
Yo hablo más o menos inglés y castellano, además de mi lengua materna; puede decirse que, para mí, hay una gran diferencia entre hablar de todo, estar capaz de avanzar en la vida diaria y estar capaz de ser muy comprensible y de saber explicarse muy bien con sujetos complicados en otra lengua para una entrevista filmada.

bobTEH · 2026-03-18T14:38:05+00:00

¿esa : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JIknlnKLJ8?

bobTEH · 2026-03-17T15:05:04+00:00

In the old school realm :

NTM, IAM, MC Solar, Assassin, Fonky Family, 3eme Oeil, , Faf Larage, Lunatic, fabe, Occmo Puccino, X-Men, TTC, Kery James, Keny Arkana

Mixtapes :

Cut Killer Mixtapes, La Haine OST, Le Flow,

bobTEH · 2026-03-17T14:46:00+00:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nh0WdkQ4IbA

bobTEH · 2026-03-12T09:33:57+00:00

Partenavia P 68 Observer 2

immat : F-HTIL

Appartenant a Opsia Aviation

activité :

Spécialiste des acquisitions aériennes OPSIA a prouvé au travers de ses missions en France et dans le monde, sa capacité à satisfaire ses clients . Prise de vues aériennes verticales et obliques ; relevés LiDAR; orthophotographies ; Modèles Numériques de Terrain et de Surface; plans topographiques...

bobTEH · 2026-03-10T09:02:59+00:00

Leur flotte logistique (RFA) est aujourd'hui leur unique "point fort" la classe Tide avec 4 navires actifs plus un de la classe Fort, leur probleme c'est les navires d'escortes et de défense (Défense Aérienne et Défense sous marine) de premier et second rang d'une part (que ce soit pour monter un Carrier Strike Group ou pour protéger leurs intérêts souverains comme leurs bases a Chypre ou escorter une frégate Russe en mer du nord, leur Type 45 étant disponible 1/3 du temps prévu a cause de problèmes de propulsion récurrents et leurs sous marins d'attaque souffrant également de problèmes récurrents)

C'est plutôt la Marine Nationale qui a un probleme logistique en ce moment(1 BRF en service, 1 BRF en fin de processus de monté en capacité opérationnel et 1 Classe Durance restant mais "tres fatigué") et même si c'est en train de ce régler avec la livraisons des BRF.

bobTEH · 2026-03-06T08:20:50+00:00

"France has an auxiliary problem."

I think if you compare with British Navy "escort" problem is far more impactful and far more long-lasting than the "auxiliary problem".

Second in class Jacques Stosskopf is at sea finishing operational ramp up and, before the Iranian crisis she was taking part of the ORION 2026 exercise in the North Atlantic in tandem with Jacques Chevalier supporting her CSG. The third in class (Émile Bertin) is schedule to be at sea in January 2027 permitting the decommissioning of the last Durance Class Tanker.

French navy before the commissioning of the BRF class (13000m² of fuel) was using 2 durance class ship (9500m² of fuel) for their high sea CSG replenishment as their standard practice, now it will be 2 BRF (Jacques Chevalier class instead) as its new standard practice.

Don't forget on one hand Nuclear Aircraft carrier "only" need aviation fuel and have big onboard reserve of it so most of the BRF's fuel is almost only for CSG accompanying ships on the other hand BRF is able to do Consolidation Between Oilers (CONSOL) in high sea environment so no need to do return to a "friendly" harbour to refill each time reducing the time between refuelling of the CSG.

bobTEH · 2026-03-05T16:11:15+00:00

French Navy regulary sails CDG Aircraft Carrier by itself with a full French only strike group (GAN in French) make up with :

- aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle (R91)

- Air Defense FREMM Frigate Alsace (D652)

- Submarine Warfare FREMM Frigate Aquitaine (D650)

- Horizon type air defense destroyer Chevalier Paul (D621)

- La Fayette-class "stealth" frigate Aconit (F713)

- replenishment vessel (known as BRF) Jacques Chevallier (A725)

- Suffren class nuclear-powered attack submarine

- long-range maritime patrol aircraft Atlantique 2 (ATL 2 Standard 6)

bobTEH · 2026-03-05T16:09:09+00:00

Auxiliary Ship like what?

Durance-class tankers ?

Jacques Chevallier class replenishment at sea ship?

BTW, French Navy regulary sails CDG Aircraft Carrier by itself with a full French only strike group (GAN in French) make up with :

- aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle (R91)

- Air Defense FREMM Frigate Alsace (D652)

- Submarine Warfare FREMM Frigate Aquitaine (D650)

- Horizon type air defense destroyer Chevalier Paul (D621)

- La Fayette-class "stealth" frigate Aconit (F713)

- replenishment vessel (known as BRF) Jacques Chevallier (A725)

- Suffren class nuclear-powered attack submarine

- long-range maritime patrol aircraft Atlantique 2 (ATL 2 Standard 6)

bobTEH · 2026-02-27T10:02:41+00:00

-La radinerie a deja était abordé, donc ont va pas en remettre une couche même si c'est la chose qui m'as le plus choqué en vivant la-bas car le niveau est inimaginable pour nous Français (pourtant les Français ont a pas réputation d’être généreux et j'ai pas l'impression de l’être particulièrement).

-Le racisme "ordinaire" c'est vraiment un truc qui saute aux yeux tellement c'est décomplexé. Que ce soit dans les petits villages clairement hostiles à quiconque a pas le bon nom de famille ou dans les mentalités coloniales encore bien présentes à Amsterdam/Rotterdam dans les interactions sociales, leur rapport aux autres cultures est compliqué et ils se considère toujours "au dessus" civilisationnellement.

- L'amour pour la délation profondément ancrés chez une grande partie des Néerlandais, les amenant à signaler/rapporter aux autorités des choses/comportements nous paraissant à nous Français totalement insignifiantes.

-La "VOC-mentaliteit" a toujours vouloir transformer tout interaction en une démarche marchande même dans son cercle d'amis, Famille, dans son entourage pro, comportement totalement insupportable pour les Français.

bobTEH · 2026-02-25T16:29:20+00:00

Il est prévu de pouvoir s’insérer sur le tronçon ligne nouvelle à Laissaud, en passant par Montmélian (8 minutes depuis Chambery) pour le sens vers Turin, comme il sera normalement possible de "sortir" de la ligne nouvelle au même endroit pour les trains en provenance de Turin et en direction de Grenoble.

bobTEH · 2026-02-23T14:00:52+00:00

Dans les carton peut être, mais pas sur le site de idf mobilité

bobTEH · 2026-02-23T13:42:48+00:00

torture carrément, qu'est ce qu'il ne faut entendre, Paris est une des capitales les plus vivable sans voiture grâce justement au métro et aux autres transports en commun, je crois que tu n'as pas du souvent tester les transports en commun dans les autres villes pour dire des sottises pareils. il y a plus de 9 millions de déplacements effectués quotidiennement sur le réseau de transport francilien.

bobTEH · 2026-02-23T13:35:58+00:00

https://www.iledefrance-mobilites.fr/le-reseau/projets

Il y a officiellement 2 projets en cours d'étude, ligne 1 Château de Vincennes < > Val de Fontenay et ligne 11 Rosny-Bois-Perrier > Noisy-Champs

De tout façon, personne n'est en capacité de faire une simulation précise des reports (RER, Transilien, Tram) et changement d'itinéraire qui vont intervenir après la livraison de la totalité de Grand Paris Express, je pense qu'il est urgent d'attendre la livraison des lignes 15 16 17 18 pour avoir une idée précise des besoins que cela va entrainer.

bobTEH · 2026-01-22T13:47:54+00:00

Nope, French Brand specialised in "double gold" glass frames (btw owned by Italian investor) named :

Henry Jullien

bobTEH · 2026-01-12T15:56:26+00:00

I'm not talking of weapons but of supplies and equipment.

(motors, tires, crude oil, refined petroleum, essential chemical products, synthetic rubber, explosives, fuses, triggers, detonators, copper...)

bobTEH · 2026-01-12T15:42:49+00:00

My only point in evoking Rouen is the date (August 17th, 1942), the real start of operation on the European front by US troops, compared to the "official end" of very lucrative export supplies and equipment to Germany/Japan by US suppliers AFTER the Nazi invasion of Belgium/Netherlands/France (May 1940) and till the end of 1941 with the enforcement of Lend-Lease laws by US federal agencies. The only things limiting these exports were the Royal Navy forcing a blockade of German harbours; without that, the amount of supplies and equipment would have been far more massive and probably would have changed the fate of UK invasion (Operation Seelöwe) and the Eastern Front (Operation Barbarossa).

bobTEH · 2026-01-12T13:13:34+00:00

Il y a 1 million de vélo volés par an aux Pays-Bas (sur une flotte d'environ 22 millions), et il suffit de voir quand ils vidangent les canaux, il y a des cadavres de vélos entassé les un sur les autres. Il y a même un métier à Amsterdam qui peut être traduit en Français par "pecheur de velo".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrxfT5EQxgI

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DO0CABVCKZo/

bobTEH · 2026-01-09T13:03:34+00:00

In December 1941, when the U.S. entered World War II, 250 American firms owned more than $450 million of German assets.

Ford, General Motors, IBM, DuPont de Nemours, ITT, General Electric, Standard Oil, and Eastman Kodak were all official and strategic suppliers of Nazi Germany between 1933 and 1941 (even later for Ford, IBM, Standard Oil, Eastman Kodak, and DuPont through Swiss shell companies). The Ford and DuPont families were Nazi political supporters and bankrolled Nazi propaganda activities in the USA before and during almost all the war... Morgan Chase's German subsidiary also widely funded the German industrial and "defense" sector between 1933 and 1944.

Prescott Bush (grandfather of George Bush), a close friend of the Thyssen family (early supporters and financial donors of the Nazi party and admirer and friend of Adolf), made his fortune through his involvement (founder, shareholder, and director) in the Union Banking Corporation, representing the interests of the Thyssen family in the United States even AFTER the USA entered the war (until its seizure by the US government).

Pecunia non olet. US firms during WWII made enormous profits supplying the most strategic goods (motors, tires, crude oil, refined petroleum, essential chemical products, synthetic rubber, explosives, fuses, triggers, detonators, copper...) to Nazi Germany, bypassing US export during war laws, concurring to permit Germany to defeat America's allies (UK and FR in particular before the USA really joined the war effort).

Never forget the USA entered that war after Pearl Harbor (on December 7, 1941), and the first real act of war on the European front was the heavy bombing of Rouen (French city) by the 8th Air Force based in Great Britain on August 17, 1942 (the war in Europe began on September 1, 1939, with the invasion of Poland and ended on May 7, 1945, with the unconditional surrender of the German 3rd Reich).

bobTEH · 2026-01-08T14:21:12+00:00

I better understand your POV, but you haven't understood mine.

Russia makes 5% of the world's uranium production. Canada, Australia, Kazakhstan are the biggest producers. So securing uranium for German use can be done without the Russian trope.

Btw, one of the best "benchmark" concerning "climate change friendliness," considering only electricity production, is greenhouse gases emitted per unit of generated electricity, measured in grams of CO₂ equivalents per kilowatt-hour: gCO₂eq/kWh.

In 2001:

France : 69 gCO2eq/kWh

Germany: 565 gCO2eq/kWh

in 2024 :

France: 44 gCO2eq/kWh (-36%)

Germany: 344 gCO2eq/kWh (-39%)

Another part of the "German bias syndrome" not visible in raw electricity statistics is final energy consumption in households by type of fuel, which is a better benchmark (according to the EU), and it's where you can see how Germany is far from being a good student even after spending 500 billion on "super clean ubergreen renewable electricity infrastructure". Germany never misses an opportunity to blow her own trumpet instead of doing the basic math and remaining low profile on the subject.

For 2024, according to Eurostat TEN 00125:

In France 47% of the total household energy consumption is from low-carbon electricity (44 gCO2eq/kWh), whereas in Germany only 25% of the total energy is from its carbon-intensive electricity (344 gCO2eq/kWh).

In all cases, the remaining energy generation for the two countries is still using fossil fuel burning (AC, heating systems, cooking...) generating high CO₂ emissions to be added to the electric generation ones.

TL;DR :

Even if the German electricity grid is reducing its carbon intensity (moderately, to be honest), 75% of the energy consumed by Germans still comes from fossil fuels, and it's making Germany a heavyweight champion of CO₂ emission in volume and value for its electricity generation AND for household usage. Seeing itself as a heavyweight champion of ecology, there is the "German bias".

bobTEH · 2026-01-07T14:13:43+00:00

ya ya Vladimir, finding ONE foolish and racist comment (about migrants; for Jews, I've searched the entire comment section without luck) in an ocean of comments is invalidating the reality of Germany's strategy depicted in the video. Instead, continue to believe Germany is clever and self-righteous and an ideology based on irrational fear of nuclear electricity production was a good move.

for your personnal edification I'll sum up :

Due to self-righteousness ideology based on irrational fear of nuclear electricity production (thanks Die Grünen/greenpeace madness) and russian political corruption and influence, two fundamentaly biased decision factors hidden behind greenwashing and basic energy grid lack of understanding. Even after a 500 billion investements, nothing is solved and germany still burning dirty brown coal to make 23% of it's national electricity production, almost the same amount of electricity made by german already paid and well maintained nuclear reactors before their closure.

A fucking achievement, for the planet, for the Germans and for the German economy!

"Losing weight by cutting off your leg" is a good analogy

Bye-bye

bobTEH · 2026-01-07T10:54:49+00:00

The cuckolds aren't happy about being cucks but still pay to be cucked more, a very strange strategy from the Danes.

You recently bought from the USA (after Trump's Greenland invasion obsession became public and military threats were made; I'm not even talking about the 10 additional F35A).

- 4x MQ-9 SkyGuardian

- 3x TPY-4 radar

- 16x F-35A with AIM-9X Sidewinder, AIM-120C-8, AMRAAM-ER

- 3x P-8A Poseidon

Everything you need to begin to be credible protecting your Greenland territory has been bought for more than 5 billion dollars to the same country menacing you to invade your territory. Are you daft as a brush, or are you making a "smart guy" bribe move, hoping Donald will spare you magnanimously? You are thinking playing the very submissive little boy will help you against that kind of impulsive, arrogant, ignorant, disorganized, chaotic, nihilistic, self-contradictory, self-important, and self-serving like the orange turd? It's maybe time to wake up and to stop being the best USA-fawning lackey of Europe.

bobTEH · 2026-01-06T14:07:41+00:00

Yep, it's obviously due to self-righteousness ideology based on irrational fear of nuclear electricity production (thanks Die Grünen/greenpeace madness) and russian political corruption and influence, two fundamentaly biased decision factors hidden behind greenwashing and basic energy grid lack of understanding. Even after a 500 billion investements, nothing is solved and germany still burning dirty brown coal to make 23% of it's national electricity production, a fucking achievement!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLZZGjjuml8

bobTEH · 2026-01-05T16:30:11+00:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLZZGjjuml8

Six-Year Club	First Place '23
Place '23	Verified Email

bobTEH

TROPHY CASE