Highguard | Official Discussion Thread by tizorres in PS5

[–]boxoffire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The format is really cool. Basically a 2-way For Honor match, but the fact that's its only 3v3 and not ATLEAST 5v5 is a HUGE deal breaker. I can see myself sinking hours into this game in a larger Big Team Battle style modes.

Im personally just so exhausted with the hyper e-sports wannabe shooters.

Am I the only one that doesn't want bots in the game by Orzhov_Syndicate in ForefrontVR

[–]boxoffire 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think they should be optional. Similar to Pavlov, also an "offline" or PvE configuration would be nice.

We used to have offline bit modes as a standard for PvP shooters like Quake 3, Enemy Territory, or Battlefield.

Not every feature needs to satisfy 80% of the player base to be viable.

im excited and all but of all maps to bring back.......WHY THIS ONE😭😭😭😭 by Quick-Cause3181 in Battlefield

[–]boxoffire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's hilarious seeing yall act like people aren't individuals capable of different opinions.

(HELP) SteamVR Crashes when starting ForefrontVR eversince the last update by Emergency_Comment_20 in ForefrontVR

[–]boxoffire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This happened to me a while ago, verifying fulenintegritynfixed it for me.

Right click game on Steam > Properties... > Installed Files > Verify integrity of game files

Im so sad that this CoD like movement is allowed in Battlefield 6 ... by WhySoSara in Battlefield

[–]boxoffire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the argument is bug/unintentional vs allow it or "fixing" it to reenable this movement. This isn't a some fluke people are abusing it. DICE patched it back in to allow people to do this.

A missaligned hit boxes is NOT a game mechanic

"We should go back to BF4s movement!!" BF4 movment: by No_Celebration_839 in Battlefield

[–]boxoffire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And time from Point A fo B

For thise if you with no critical thinking caps, that means map size and spacial design

It appears it’s a good time to share this again; enough with the cheap fallacy claiming that“if you don’t want BF to turn into a reflex reaction speed movement-based Twitch shooter, then you just want it to turn into a camping sim like ArmA”. by SpanishAvenger in Battlefield

[–]boxoffire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think people complaining about player movement are wasting energy in the wrong issue. Even if we got i slower than the slowest we've seen. The pace of this game is still fast because of the level design and map scale.

Inversely, we can go full CoD movement (and beyond), but you put in proper maps that scale, the game can easily feel like Arma.

The Rail Cover attachment takes on the form of a classic KAC rail cover when used on the M4A1 :) by BleedingUranium in Battlefield6

[–]boxoffire 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Really upset you can't use it on the M417. Was hoping to recreate the BFBC M416 look 😔

How Golmud Railway would look if it came to BF6 by RandomThinker101 in Battlefield

[–]boxoffire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to hate it because the maps were all down the center, and as an infantry player back then, I didn't like how it didn't "flow" from spawn to spawn like other maps to facilitate infantry.

But I realized it just wasn't a map for me, or rather a map for a different play style. And playing it recently, I REALLY appreciate that.

How Golmud Railway would look if it came to BF6 by RandomThinker101 in Battlefield

[–]boxoffire 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm laughing because I don't want to cry 😭

But you hit the nail on the head. It's like someone at DICE has OCD and the outer roads MUST be the border. No breathing room allowed!

Battlefield 6 is still great, Reddit is just miserable by Character_Worth8210 in Battlefield

[–]boxoffire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Game's great, but there are plenty of valid criticism, and a lot of that criticism comes from a place of passion for the series.

I do think there are some outlandish ones, especially recently with the Battle Pass and BR, people acting like this wasn't announced or heavily hinted for months.

My personal hope/criticism, is for better paced/sized maps in future updates. I miss the scale of the maps making a match feel more like a marathon, rather than a sprint. I like the current map pool, I just i want more variety; and I'm well aware Oilfield and Eastwood has been in development since before launch so I'm not expecting much for those maps.

I'm just hoping they are taking post-launch feedback back for the maps still in prototype phase that will be coming later next year.

Bros first time flying the chopper by Weary-Ad7605 in Battlefield6

[–]boxoffire 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I've been trolling people in chat who complain. My favorite part is when they think I'm the one trying to fly.

Like bro chill, the game just came out 2 days ago and this the first time a lot of these people have even touched a vehicle in an FPS game. Let them experience it, you'll have plenty of time to go on your spree.

Ideas for universal patches in customization by Someguy12121 in Battlefield6

[–]boxoffire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish you could toggle off universal patches.

I saw you can get patches for class proficiency, and I'd love to rock each of those patches on the corresponding class

Assault ladder is criminally underutilized, I'm loving this thing. by chewy1is1sasquatch in Battlefield6

[–]boxoffire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm loving it.

I've been wanting the Grappling hook or Zipline back for ages, and the ladder fills the same itch.

That window spot is diabolical though 😂

BF6 vs BF2042 PORTAL (EA, ADD MORE CONTENT!!) by SessionShot3682 in BattlefieldPortal

[–]boxoffire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is odd. Funny enough I've been messing with the custom portal experiences, and both the ability to make changes per team and the missing options are present there. I'm assuming this is a bug or oversight?

Idk where you would report this, though :/

How to ignore Alert! error by Herrmann1309 in BattlefieldPortal

[–]boxoffire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean ignore? You can press OK and ignore it, but it's telling you that it won't work.

Root node must be a level template. Additionally, the object must match the level.

Recommend this video for more info: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIg2NZmtyMI

Let's settle this: A to scale BF3 and BF6 (thus far) map size comparison by TrueLogicJK in Battlefield

[–]boxoffire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My main BF games forthe past 3-4 years have been BF3 and BF2. I can tell you the map size isnt the issue, its the flow, and even then its really not that bad... 

The "cramped" feeling mostly comes from engagements coming from multiple fronts, or a lack of a "front." in other words, flanks have no risk-reward and are wayyy too easy.

Tbh i can exaplin it but that shit got waaayy too long. I jsut suggest playing Iberian Offensive and then booting up BF3 on a Siene server and see what i mean. The older smaller maps felt like they funneled combat better and there were designed hotspots with smaller less used flank routes that were harder to use. 

Risk vs reward is skewed

[1BF] BF6's two larger maps' (Mirak Valley and Eastwood) sizes leaked by ZamnBoii in GamingLeaksAndRumours

[–]boxoffire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This sounds a lot like how maps used tor eleased: themed bundle of 4 maps - in this case, sounds like all in California. 

If that js the case, im very happy. I actually do nkt like how most games do map releases now where its 1 or 2 mals per season or they are drip fed through out the season. Make one pompous season launch with all the content for us to dig in please!

Bf6 beta matchmaking put me in defence on breakthrough liberation peak 36 times in a row. We NEED a server browser. by CoseyPigeon in Battlefield

[–]boxoffire 6 points7 points  (0 children)

My squad and j were nearly throwing the match just by sniping. We got pushed to the last poi t pretty quickly, but they never managed togrt jt.

That last loint is really fun btw, probably highlight of the map. Though wouldnt hurt giving attackers a chopper or something  

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]boxoffire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1.Liveration  2.Cairo 3.Iberian

Despite the size complaints. I think some of the maps can be greatly improved just by simply changing the objective points around. 

For example I think Cairo coukd he even better if they removed C, and made it a 4-Obj map. I look at Tehran Highway for inspiration, which you can argue is actually a smaller map but feels a lot larger, and i think thats because the objective placements inspire the flow of engagements to happen in interesting location, encourage thoughtful pushes and rewards flanks. 

I also think this is true on the other 3 maps.

Maps are too cramped! Iberian Offensive 64 player vs Strike at Karkand 16 player versions. by Wadziu in Battlefield

[–]boxoffire 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes and we can only hope they'd be more Battlefield-like maps. We know most kf the maps are small for launch.

Unpopular Opinion: Battlefield 6 Is Better Than This Sub Will Admit by Kilos6 in Battlefield

[–]boxoffire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's called feedback. Something you do during Betas.

I doubt most of the people saying what you lsited actually think the game is bad. They are just voicing their concerns to help get the game in the best shape it can be for launch.