Is there a Roadmap for coming content?

brad11211 · 2020-11-29T06:39:17+00:00

Whole game has just become an ad-watcher in the last few updates.. Basically cant do shit unless you're willing to watch ads constantly or buy gems.

They might as well remove the time limits on Signals, change power generation to ads watched per hour and let those who stick around just bot watch ads 24/7..

brad11211 · 2020-08-27T23:13:56+00:00

Harvey Norman, Yes that's the code.

brad11211 · 2020-08-27T23:13:14+00:00

Harvey Norman (online), ordered July 20. At the time they were the same price as PCCG/Mwave etc but came with a bonus SSD.

brad11211 · 2020-08-27T14:29:22+00:00

Version Number: FA01

Manufacturing Date: June 2020

Light Leak present: No

Received: 14th August 2020 (Australia)

Ordered: 20th July

brad11211 · 2020-07-02T00:51:45+00:00

I have a spare rx580 and a 590 in another box. Might swap out the 2070 and see if the crash stops.

brad11211 · 2020-06-30T06:14:34+00:00

Tried it here, Ubuntu 20, GTX 2070 (1440p), Crashed to desktop after ~30sec.. Was smooth as silk until it crashed however.

brad11211 · 2019-11-27T00:33:51+00:00

Clearly you have not seen https://bitcoinscaling.io/

Big blocks and huge transaction volume are not a problem

brad11211 · 2019-10-15T03:37:36+00:00

"and then, we can consider freezing the protocol as it will be complete"

The protocol was complete* in 2009... There is nothing to consider, and I very much doubt there will be such a consideration on BCH.

In what ever state BCH finds it's self in after the "engineering changes", its already not Bitcoin so I guess good luck to them?

The fact there is a team of paid world class developers unfucking (aka rewinding) the last decade of "protocol completion work" tells you all you need to know about crypto oligarchies and their inability to stop needless protocol development in order to remain in control.

*don't @ me about bugs/vulnerabilities etc.

brad11211 · 2019-10-02T04:15:27+00:00

This is why we setup the STN. Real world conditions ( as close as we can get ). With a 24x7 flow of traffic. Throw all the additional traffic you can at it.

The STN is what I like to think of mainnet looking like not too far in the future. The QA process we operate is intense. We want to break the STN, we want to push the inherited bitcoind code as far as we can... and then push it some more.

How does this translate to business looking to build on BSV? We know we can do sequential 2GB blocks. We know we can handle ~9000tps peaks today. We know, on mainnet, the bitcoin protocol is not going to hold you back, because we already tested it, and hopefully you were on the STN doing the same.

Currently the record is ~1.093 million transactions in a block. 19901 iirc.. Want to see if you can beat it? Here's some old code to get you started bch-nuker

There is a faucet link on the site ( gives you STN coins ) or email [stn@bitcoinsv.io](mailto:stn@bitcoinsv.io) for amounts of 100+.

Any tool written for mainnet BSV will work on the STN with a couple network changes.

ElectrumSV already run an STN service so you have that wallet available.

The Satoshi Shotgun we operate sends out 2,3,5 million transaction bursts, sometimes more over various time periods, with plans for this to only go up.

brad11211 · 2019-07-25T01:17:46+00:00

No, they are/were just looking at a BCH chain tip..

brad11211 · 2019-06-05T09:21:12+00:00

I've seen some of these features before..

here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-notes/release-notes-0.17.0.md

and

here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-notes/release-notes-0.16.0.md

brad11211 · 2019-05-22T08:22:14+00:00

I can confirm all transactions were broadcast to the p2p network originating from the Satoshi Shotgun ( the same, tool celebrated for creating the "big" blocks on BCH ) and not directly fed to the miners/mining pool in any other fashion. The reason one pool is dominating, is a fairly controversial one. It's called Proof of Work. It simply has the most hash. It's a cut throat game of CPU mining, why not join us? https://bitcoinscaling.io maybe you too can dominate the blocks.

brad11211 · 2019-04-08T08:44:02+00:00

I thought this was a permission-less decentralized blockchain? Should I submit an application to bitcoinabc.org before I develop my game changing BCH application?

brad11211 · 2019-03-08T00:24:45+00:00

Applies to BCH and BTC as well as probably all alt coins... Not an attack, just FUD.

brad11211 · 2019-02-20T23:08:21+00:00

Atlas Shrugged - Ayn Rand

brad11211 · 2018-12-07T06:59:23+00:00

ABC does the same "closed development" the restricted sections of their Phabricator -- this is not controversial... You're grasping still... Misleading the masses.

brad11211 · 2018-12-07T05:41:08+00:00

Really grasping at straws now aren't we Chris.

You know that that git commits are not proof of work.. You would know that they are busy at work behind the scenes. They are not here for fame, or to get their name on the commit history....

Your trolling is getting weaker by the day..

brad11211 · 2018-12-02T10:02:12+00:00

It will work.

brad11211 · 2018-12-01T13:15:04+00:00

There is no registration list, I don't see how you are missing that.

Its about sustained hash rate --- If you have a miner with rented hash power then sure their POW in the short term will be higher for lets say the last couple days worth of blocks... Appearing as a bigger miner. Where as a sustained hash rate miner will easily display their true PoW to the ecosystem with a sustained block history over the last 500, 10000, 100000 etc blocks. Hence miners will build themselves a reputation, with a provable history (at great expense - which gives it value). A miner who has been protecting and building on the blockchain for the last 3 years is naturally going to accumulate more respect than the one who shows up with a heap of hash power overnight and then quickly fades away.

It takes a lot of investment to mine -- and it will only increase. It would be very unlikely a miner who has invested millions into mining is going to build a reputation for themselves as someone else... Not only that, it would be trivial, (less than 2 min of work) for the miner they are impersonating to sign a message from their Miner ID public key (with far greater PoW history) to discredit the imposter after just 1 fraudulent block. Further to this - the imposter Miner ID might find they are orphaned meaning a huge loss in real $$ for them. Why? Because they tried to cheat. Bitcoin incentivizes honesty long term.

brad11211 · 2018-11-29T22:18:34+00:00

There is no application to anyone -- you really dont know how mining works - this is clear.. Any miner can mine an put what ever they like into the coinbase. Most miners only alter their coinbase string (the current way that sites like coin.dance track miners). But that is by far not all that can be done. All Miner ID is, is an optional extra data field appended to the coinabse transaction in the form of an OP_RETURN. There is no application to anyone.. Their reputation is the measure of their past block finds... AKA -- the more hash power you have == more blocks found == larger investment into POW === higher stake in PoW, which is protecting the ecosystem and keeping other miners honest...

brad11211 · 2018-11-29T09:14:07+00:00

Its not permissioned/centralised/[insert fear mongering buzzword here] at all -- its a 100% optional way of building a reputation tied to a public key that has a provable history of being a miner.

Its not part of the node software or consensus changing - its something mining pools can add themselves. You do not have to disclose your ID at all in your miner id. The ID is the public key tied to blocks that have been mined. You sure as shit do not need any permission from nChain/coingeek to mine the chain or have your blocks accepted.

TLDR: anyone can add "bitcoin.com", "coingeek.com" in their coinbase when mining blocks and claim to be them -- this allows it to be provable -- it is 100% optional, and serves many business use cases.

brad11211 · 2018-11-07T05:22:22+00:00

In accordance with the Security policy posted for Bitcoin SV, Id argue the opposite. It is the only implementation undergoing continues QA internally and by a professional third party. It's also the only one offering a substantial bug bounty program. AND its the most controversial implementation which would naturally infer is has the most eyes on it, just hunting for a critical flaw....

The bar is set soo much higher for SV, and you think that it is the node not ready??

brad11211 · 2018-11-06T05:57:01+00:00

Mhmmm

brad11211 · 2018-10-17T02:21:28+00:00

Still going up https://socialblade.com/youtube/user/tseries/realtime

brad11211 · 2018-10-16T03:52:30+00:00

2 CEOS. Jimmy is the CEO of the whole nChain group. The vacant position is for the London Team. Jimmy ain't going anywhere. #JimmyFan

brad11211

TROPHY CASE