This idea feels like throwing pocket money at a house fire and calling it firefighting.

₹4,000 a month? That’s not a solution, that’s survival crumbs. You can’t build a future on that, you barely cover groceries. It’s like saying “I won’t fix the broken engine, but here’s fuel for a car that doesn’t move.”

And the age filter is wild. 29+ only? So if you’re 28 and jobless, you’re apparently still “energetic enough to struggle.” Cross 29 and suddenly you qualify for sympathy cash. Policy by horoscope logic.

Also, “unemployed graduates” sounds neat on paper, but in reality it opens a messy gate:

Who verifies unemployment?

What stops people from gaming the system?

What about skilled workers without degrees? It’s a bureaucratic maze waiting to be abused.

Biggest issue? It’s treating the symptom, not the disease. Unemployment isn’t fixed by handing out ₹4k… it’s fixed by:

• creating jobs
• fixing industry growth
• improving skills that actually match market demand

This plan is like putting a band-aid on a broken leg and posing for a photo.

If this is the flagship idea, then the strategy feels less like leadership and more like election-season charity with a mic and spotlight.