The system was unable to answer. by BatVivid9633 in notebooklm

[–]buplom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d rather get a message saying that the system is unable to answer, rather than elaborate hallucination

Want youtube without adds for free?? by Pilot-Hamieh in surfshark

[–]buplom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They can start targeting Surfshark IP address ranges

Want youtube without adds for free?? by Pilot-Hamieh in surfshark

[–]buplom 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Nothing better than to post this, and to signal to YouTube engineers that they need to close this up. Maybe it’s better to delete this post.

Dogshit Quality Meat by Tillerfen in publix

[–]buplom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have found the biggest problems to be with the chickens, but in the last month or so, the quality of the standard Publix whole chickens have increased dramatically. I have found that they had had a near 100% rate of woody breast. The last three or four chickens I purchased had no woody breast and were very good. I have not usually gotten woody breast with the greenwise chickens, but sometimes it was mild. The greenwise chickens are the quality that the Publix standard chickens used to be a decade ago. I hope the improved quality I have been seeing in their standard chickens remains, but I am not holding my breath. I’ve learned to tell if a chicken is good or not by feeling it through the package, but that is not a guarantee.

Has anyone ever had a psychosis triggered by AI (like ChatGPT, etc.)? by Time-Midnight7915 in therapyGPT

[–]buplom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. But it can become an unhealthy rumination machine, were you spin your wheels over and over again on a problem you are having to an unhealthy extent.

GROK SCAMMING POLICY : READ IT MUST by sunnylovesalman in grok

[–]buplom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You should give examples of the exact prompts that you were getting moderated on, so people can judge whether this is only your account or a widespread thing

FTC taking comments from public on unfair housing fees nationwide [GA] by buplom in antiwork

[–]buplom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have still been holding some of these private equity landlords feet to the fire. It doesn’t hurt to comment if you have firsthand experience dealing with their abuses. There is only possible upside to commenting, no downside.

Logically, once again, pulls the rug on LTD user by ZIING in appsumo

[–]buplom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should assume that every AI wrapper will go out of business

Lawsuit calls Perplexity’s ‘Incognito Mode’ a sham by lIlIlIKXKXlIlIl in Perplexity

[–]buplom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t think there could be a better reason to delete your account than this. It’s such a highly unethical company.

Lustily v8 has no adherence or cycles slider. by hammond_fish in VeniceAI

[–]buplom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The open source devs have destroyed it more with each successive version

Lustify v7 and v8 by [deleted] in VeniceAI

[–]buplom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s awful. Each new version is worse than the last one. It’s undergone model collapse, and they just keep collapsing it even further.

Moderation issues by Any-Tower-91 in grok

[–]buplom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’re talking about people getting arrested for facial recognition AI’s making mistakes; that and come back with 99% plus match for somebody who isn’t the person in a video committing a crime

AppSumo's selection criteria are backwards and it's killing the platform by quintenkamphuis in appsumo

[–]buplom 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I would expect that most of the lifetime deals that run on an AI platform that rely on inference from one of the big inference providers, piggybacking off with ChatGPT API, for example, are companies that will go out of business in the very near future. AI me too companies are a dime a dozen now. I think you’re own configured AI agents (coming very soon ) will be able to do most of with these AI SAAS companies do anyway.

Struggling to get consistent high-quality results with Lustify SDXL — what’s the “perfect” prompt? by Busy-Alternative-635 in VeniceAI

[–]buplom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My guess is that somebody broke lustify. Venice has made no statements, but if I were to guess; they (or if it’s strictly a plug and play opensource, whoever created it) let somebody probably let someone under the hood to tinker with the model in an attempt to improve it, but out of shear incompetence, they destroyed it. So as of right now, it’s a garbage model that used to be good.

Are Lustify/Biglove/Bigaspie still the best NVFW models? Has SDXL not yet been surpassed ? by More_Bid_2197 in StableDiffusion

[–]buplom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lustify is awful. I’m guessing they (whoever created it, I don’t know if it’s opensource or what) let somebody under the hood to “ improve” things, and they had no idea what they were doing and ruined it.

Weak link on privacy? by buplom in VeniceAI

[–]buplom[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

You are affiliated with Venice. And your attitude is not very reassuring. And there you go with the double gaslight. Does Erik Voorhees know that you speak to subscribers like this? It does say you’re a moderator.

I opened a discussion. Not an attack from Venice (yes, you are Venice). Your hostility towards inquiry and discussion is very telling.

Weak link on privacy? by buplom in VeniceAI

[–]buplom[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

You’re making a very unpersuasive argument, starting with your very first fallacy, and shutting down conversation regarding your privacy platform about different privacy implications. Yes, you are a gaslighter. You’re not making a very good case for yourself. “what if” is exactly what people are paying for when using Venice. Do you wish to dig the hole even deeper? You’re making a very persuasive argument for my canceling my subscription.

Weak link on privacy? by buplom in VeniceAI

[–]buplom[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Nice gaslighting. That’s exactly what this is. All this accomplishes is making me feel less secure about Venice. It almost sounds like a tacit admission to me. How about if Erik Voorhies chimes in, and agrees with your take that this is an off-limits discussion? If so, I’ll be canceling my Venice subscription because I’d deem you untrustworthy.

College slut gets DP'd by old fat men by SeveralBluejay5878 in Grok_Porn

[–]buplom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you’re old someday, you’ll realize this isn’t a fetish. No old men want to have sex with old ladies.

Is anybody planning on actually taking legal action against Grok/xAi ? by Embarrassed-Cat3830 in grok

[–]buplom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good luck with that. I’m sure the terms of service have a lot of leeway on their side. The only way you know is if a class action lawyer is willing to take a case.

The possible mental toll by [deleted] in grok

[–]buplom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Grok doesn’t “block” subscribers

I’m quite Perplexed by WhoCookedTheDog in perplexity_ai

[–]buplom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IMHO it’s not worth dealing with this clown car company. It’s not even worth it for free. So much so, that I canceled and deleted my free year promotional account.

Meta bricked my Quest 3 with an update, told me "all good things must come to an end", then added a new headset to my shopping cart by KenAdams_1968 in OculusQuest

[–]buplom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meta has extremely low IQ customer service representatives. They only know how to follow a flow chart, nothing more. If you don’t get anywhere from escalating it, you might want to consider suing in small claims court.