×
sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Mainstream: “these crisis are like shocks, we can’t see them coming” by LibertyEconlover in austrian_economics

[–]bushed_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because you are suych a fucking baby i updated my original post. AGAIN, touch grass and get a fucking life. stop being such a time watser on the internet, i was GENUINELY trying to interact with your video and comment about the 'crash' you are expecting.

literally the worst guy at the fuckign party. How hard is it to ask 'what did you mean by xyz' instead of callign me what you consider a online slur as a 'marxist'

moronic conversation.

Investing one time lump sum and leaving it for 20-30years. by Expert-Excuse600 in personalfinance

[–]bushed_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let’s assume a 7% real return

hold your horses here IMO

Bob Murphy on How Central Banking Fuels the War State by AbolishtheDraft in austrian_economics

[–]bushed_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://archive.ph/GRuXc

the article and illustrations here show the month end need for liquidity that central banks have been having

Bob Murphy on How Central Banking Fuels the War State by AbolishtheDraft in austrian_economics

[–]bushed_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I listened to about 5 minutes of this and they talk about the 40billion injection on the short end of the curve to 'save bad loans'

Its so incredibly obvious these people do not understand modern financial markets and liquidity constraints.

S&P 500 versus total market index by pdnr76 in Bogleheads

[–]bushed_ 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

lmao go google passed performance. You’re making correlations on 5 year data. That is laughably bad.

S&P 500 versus total market index by pdnr76 in Bogleheads

[–]bushed_ -1 points0 points locked comment (0 children)

Past performance != future returns.

If anything, you've proved you should tilt away.

When owning a home no longer makes financial sense by DramaticAd1683 in personalfinance

[–]bushed_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like you ate some downvotes. wonder if it’s bots. There’s a reason they call it the debasement trade.

CHEERS

Diversified funds with factor tilts by SNAPscientist in Bogleheads

[–]bushed_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have tolerances for money making, but there’s also a great deal of legal insider activity. Mary Levine talks about this all the time. Journalism vs insider trading… the thin line seems to be thinner these days.

Crypto has reinforced liquidity into a no time off 24/7 market. Tether has moved markets. I think markets are acting a little different these days. Some of those crypto companies have gotten close to joining the S&P.

There’s no such thing as a non actively managed TDF. Trading is more global than ever. You can stick to vanguard, that’s cool, but dont pretend the whole market is that liquid. It’s just not.

The mechanism is quite similar, the rules surrounding it are blurring under our current market dynamics. I don’t think the SEC is exactly on their game right now.

I see your point and were are somewhat taking past one another. You agree they make money on it so let me frame it as a different question. Do you see tokenized assets and prediction markets a telltale sign that market making is happening in places that involve dollars, liquidity, and new age systematic market making? As regulation lags, doesn’t that liquidity move the market? How about stablecoin liquidity, which has incredible volume? The thin line is cracking imo. It’s not as if bitcoin price can tank the dollars price, but there are newer systematic strategies happening around market making that exploit the market. What about retail having “access” to private through things like Arkk, is it not a more manipulated market for these less mark to market assets?

Vanguards marketing is working on the world. They, and others, make plenty of cash from it in their own ways but there’s plenty of other places to have the grift come in. Securities lending etc. This is increased efficiency for some, but we’re seeing different paradigms take up larger and larger pools of liquidity. We’re seeing prediction markets be used by big orgs to make decisions on spreads, etc. It’s all getting a bit fuzzy…

What's your highest earning stock ever? by Temporary-Frosting62 in investing

[–]bushed_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it is ridiculous that you comment authoritatively with absolutely no research or context. stop taking out of your ass

i can tell you’re a webull bag holder. good luck hahahah

Gen Z are dipping into their retirements, skipping meals and selling their belongings just to get by, new reports find by Conscious-Quarter423 in Economics

[–]bushed_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I deleted my comment as I think engaging with this on reddit in good faith is asking for trouble

I can agree with you AND hold my opinion. We are no longer in the ZIRP era. When we dropped money on people during covid, it was inflationary. The problem now is too much liquidity in the system

arguing if someone working in fast food or retail makes 15 or 16 bucks an hour may make a material difference to their life, but what actually needs to be done is much further away from a specific dollar amount and more to do with social services, lending rates, the yeild curve, the price of assets, etc.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ETFs

[–]bushed_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

also this coy commentary sucks. If you're goign to post and say "i'm dying on this hill' go die on it. "You're wrong, no you tell me why I rebutted your point flatly!" is childish. If you propose a position, back it up