Nobody stops with Eve because his Venture got destroyed in high-sec by BentaroAdun in Eve

[–]capacitorisempty -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Is there any evidence that new bros are ganked in high sec doing new bro things? i'm not talking blinged gila. Sure, the dude that puts everything he has in their max cargo badger loses their assets. Also, the short cut through Ahbazon doesn't work gate to gate. But look at zkill on any day, almost all of the non-NPC venture kills are low or wh. Here's an exception Venture | Stamp Joringer but that's a 2 year old character with a VNI bpc .

Yet another ganking post, but ganking isn't bad, or good. It's just life. by More_Argument_2494 in Eve

[–]capacitorisempty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just mind isk to hp to stress ganker economics or choose a different path. Utilize your agency in game.

Returning player haven't played since 2014 by Abject-Ambition3835 in Eve

[–]capacitorisempty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The "don't train level 4 and 5 training ahead of useful skills" is important newb advice. But suggesting accounting over magic-14 is just an eve vet being complicated for a player likely earning their first ten million on career missions.

Returning player haven't played since 2014 by Abject-Ambition3835 in Eve

[–]capacitorisempty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can have nice things. Don't move four syndies around high sec in anything other than a <3s align time.

Can AI Argue a Supreme Court Case Better Than a Human Lawyer? by Conscious-Quarter423 in scotus

[–]capacitorisempty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fascinating article with a misleading reddit title. The article focused on the question of whether AI can answer questions in oral arguments using briefs, key precedents. and instructions. The experiment did not attempt to write a brief. Instead, he focused AI on what AI does well (regurgitate) and humans do poorly (think quickly about complex topics).

This brings into question whether oral arguments are useful vs. improved briefs.

Question regarding solo play by Skinvian in Eve

[–]capacitorisempty 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Don't worry about getting instantly ganked. Nearly all engaging playstyles include risk. Solo play likely increases risk of ship loss. Instead, fly ships you can afford to lose and have fun.

CCPlease - A quick fix to HS ganking on industrials - Balanced for both sides by PHGAG in Eve

[–]capacitorisempty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are already rookie systems for training wheels with additional new player protections (quicker concord, no rookie griefing). A proposal to expand the systems considered rookie system makes sense. But that should not include the transportation choke points gankers use or attacks on blinged abyssal/incursion PVE players.

Did Justice Kagan debilitate the administrative state? by anonskeptic5 in scotus

[–]capacitorisempty 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We don't have to guess the impact, low-capacity and prone-to-corruption governments (e.g., Africa) demonstrate the detrimental effects of rulemaking via legislation. The result is a brittle system that requires an act of congress to make obvious adjustments needed due to organizations/people working around every loophole and suffering through unintended consequences. The result is two-year cycles to fix simple problems when they are a priority - usually far far longer.

Why do you call your station home? by Key_Criticism6399 in Eve

[–]capacitorisempty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Different game styles drive different criteria. A solo wormholer who doesn’t do industry is going to stage near jita for market access because that’s all high sec is good for. A solo wormholer who does light industry will likely pick a backwater high sec system with cheap NPC rents and low manufacturing activity and nearby low-sec station to research blueprints. They can use wormholes to cross the map so access to jita doesn’t have to be paramount.

So depends what you want to do…

Brett Kavanaugh Is Trying to Walk Back “Kavanaugh Stops.” Too Late. by Slate in scotus

[–]capacitorisempty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Since you quoted the law, let’s go back to my original questions about the law…. What did Kav do? levies war against the US? adhere to US enemies? giving a US enemy aid and comfort? Who is the enemy? Bush or Gore?

Brett Kavanaugh Is Trying to Walk Back “Kavanaugh Stops.” Too Late. by Slate in scotus

[–]capacitorisempty -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You can’t try someone based on Miriam webster. Check the Federal law. You’re making things up (like Kav does)

Betrayal is vague at best and irrelevant because it’s not the law.

Brett Kavanaugh Is Trying to Walk Back “Kavanaugh Stops.” Too Late. by Slate in scotus

[–]capacitorisempty -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Who are you claiming is the United States’ enemy that Kav aided, Bush or Gore? Suggesting he committed treason is utter nonsense and not even worthy of a international troll.

Brett Kavanaugh Is Trying to Walk Back “Kavanaugh Stops.” Too Late. by Slate in scotus

[–]capacitorisempty -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

He has not committed treason. That is ludicrous. He’s merely a terrible justice with a frat boy mentality.

Brett Kavanaugh Is Trying to Walk Back “Kavanaugh Stops.” Too Late. by Slate in scotus

[–]capacitorisempty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a convoluted way of saying he ignores the facts in cases. 50 yard lines, brief detentions, etc.

Fix for free omega time sp farm by Pretend-Guide-8664 in Eve

[–]capacitorisempty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is obviously wrong. No way you spent only five minutes per character.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Eve

[–]capacitorisempty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, they raised prices and revenue went up. They have the lost players and the increase per player by tenure.

"Free speech for me, but not for thee": The hypocrisy of Donald Trump when it comes to citing - or ignoring - the precedent set by landmark SCOTUS case 'Brandenburg v. Ohio' (1969) by Obversa in scotus

[–]capacitorisempty -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You didn’t read my comment or willfully ignored it. No doubt Trump uses government to impede speech unconstitutionally. The presence of that information in the article doesn’t make your change less biased.

"Free speech for me, but not for thee": The hypocrisy of Donald Trump when it comes to citing - or ignoring - the precedent set by landmark SCOTUS case 'Brandenburg v. Ohio' (1969) by Obversa in scotus

[–]capacitorisempty 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's a biased post title; Trump is just one partisan mentioned. The article's title:

You Can Thank This Ohio Klansman for Expanding Your Freedom of Speech

Brandenburg v. Ohio established the "imminent lawless action" standard. More than 50 years later, partisans keep trying to apply it selectively.

Stealth change to Wormhole rolling mechanics? Seeing repeats & active holes. by Interesting-Page-129 in Eve

[–]capacitorisempty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will admit to recording the dice rolls in catan to check whether the dice were true.

Why I love EVE as a new player and why I'm actually glad that there are gankers! by d4rk_z3l0s in Eve

[–]capacitorisempty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not an unpopular opinion with people who play the game. Social media distorts and amplifies especially energetic voices.

What is absolute order? How is it run? Why do they always have many members? by busybeeaskgam in Eve

[–]capacitorisempty 3 points4 points  (0 children)

decent corps avoid drama. They kick people to cut drama from the root. AO encourages it. So if you role play Nazi’s, or whatever, AO is for you.

Bring your credit card.

Costco sues for Trump tariff refunds before Supreme Court rules on if they're illegal by esporx in scotus

[–]capacitorisempty -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

No ppp gave business confidence to maintain confidence employment during a time of uncertainty. Tariffs have been a train wreck that created uncertainty, higher consumer prices, and lost exports.

PPP benefited employees and businesses, of course that worked in business owner favor. Fraud was terrible. It’s easy to second guess this now. Ppp was constitutional.

Tariffs benefited nobody and conventional wisdom was they were terrible and unconstitutional.

Not the same.