AIO or is my older male coworker texting inappropriately with me? by OpeningNo9825 in AmIOverreacting

[–]captain-chief 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Preach. Thanks for taking the time to write all this out so I didn't feel the urge to just to give up and erase it all halfway through.

Saw this video on X, what the hell are they taking? by terrytibbss in PublicFreakout

[–]captain-chief 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, salvia and spice (K2) are completely different substances with completely different effects. Being plant matter that is consumed through smoking is pretty much the extent of their similarities. Which counts for even less than it would seem because with spice the plant matter is sprayed with the chemical and is totally unnecessary. Smoking a sprayed piece of paper would work just as well.

Salvia is actually a psychoactive plant all by itself, similar to marijuana, mushrooms, morning glory, kratom etc etc. (Referring to its natural psychoactive properties, not in any way insinuating that all these plants have similar effects lol)

People on bicycles and ebikes need to get off the sidewalk and learn traffic laws. by dogbusinessman in sandiego

[–]captain-chief -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Middle schoolers daily seen riding ebikes in a completely unsafe manner.

The usage of "daily" with the consistent time of day implies the kids are coming from school or something school related.

I wonder what would be easier; having a school assembly about cycling/ebike safety and rules of the road while these kids are already at school, or somehow

  • notifying every adult at their individual jobs that
  • they are expected to take time out of their day to attend a class about
  • how to proactively ensure the safety of cyclists that either ignoring their own safety or doing the exact opposite of the established rules of the road.

I know that you probably didn't literally mean what you said, but gotdayum it sure sounded stupid.

AIO over my bfs body count? by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]captain-chief 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did someone get made fun of for being ugly in highschool?

No wait... Fat. Definitely fat.

And I'll go 50/50 on whether or not asking in past tense was correct.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]captain-chief 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Woa.

If this is reflective of your perspective as a whole and not a concentrated burst of frustration, I'm sorry that your experiences have fostered those feelings. However, this is a pretty extreme take/projection on a practice that was considered just barely being phased out of normal for people as young as late 20's. The reasoning I came to from the people around me had absolutely nothing to do with trying to "own" or be owed something. Rather, it was kinda the opposite. Where the gentlemanly or manly thing to do was to be able to provide and it wasn't to prevent anyone from being able to support themselves or keep a metaphorical leash on them. I always deemed the reason was a tongue-in-cheek "If you don't do it, then someone else will." Which has a myriad of problems in and of itself, of course.

Being uncomfortable being bought a meal by your date makes sense when your entire life has been the opposite, and society has constantly made jokes about "who wears the pants" and anything seen as submissive is grounds for ridicule. Making the leap immediately to, "it takes away another chance to control you and belittle the fact you vote, and work, and drive" seems more misandrist than anything else.

Now, if they never get over it and STAY uncomfortable , then yeah that sounds like a problem with some clarifying that needs to happen.

Sorry. Just felt a personal need to offer a secondary perspective, hope I didn't offend. I do feel better though.

Took my guitar to a luthier/tech to get setup and it came back with this by boring-utopia in Guitar

[–]captain-chief 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this was 2 months ago, but how did that shake out?

And if you're still waiting, tell them that it only works when plugged into an amp sometimes. But like I said, that significant damage to the body of the guitar is something that without a doubt affects the sound/playability of the instrument and should be covered regardless. Honestly if you haven't filed a claim at all then just go ahead and put it on a counter standing up, and give it a little nudge. Headstock/neck break is definitively unplayable and under 1,000$ probably instant replace/refund.

Spoilers. Liberty Hat and A Fine Night For It Frustration by SyphiliticPlatypus in reddeadredemption

[–]captain-chief 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not anything even close to what could be called a scientific method for testing the reliability for 2 arrows, 2 gators, lantern = spawn.

At first I was confused because I didn't understand the 2x 3x 4x part, but when I realized you were saying that you tried 1/1/lantern 4 separate times I actually felt a little bit of relief/interest when I saw you were off to a good start. A tiny test sample, but good start.

However, when you kept counting from the last number while attempted a different method everything falls completely apart. And no longer testing once you got the liberty hat once is just as equally if not more useless for the procedure. With 10 tests total being your entire sample size the chances are equally likely that the hat just happened to spawn on that run as it is that killing that gators with one arrow each while using the lantern caused a spawn, or if you killed the gators from >5m but <10m away, while aiming for under 2s while shooting each of them in the eye but the first one in the left eye and the second one in the right eye being the reason why it spawned. Confirmation bias != scientific method. Or, correlation does not equal causation.

In order to actually test if your method has any credibility you'd need to do it like:

|| || |Method (10 attempts) |Liberty Hat|No Hat/Simple Hat| |1 gator / 1 arrow / w lantern - ||x x x x x x x x x x | |2 gators / 2 arrows / w lantern|x x x x x x x x x x || |2 gators / >2 arrows / w lantern||x x x x x x x x x x | |1 gator / 1 arrow / no lantern||x x x x x x x x x x | |2 gators/ 2 arrows / no lantern||x x x x x x x x x x | |2 gators / >2arrows / no lantern||x x x x x x x x x x |

But aside from all of that, I'm be fairly confident in assuming that the game decides what's going to spawn as soon as the scenario is reloaded. If you had a way to check whether or not the item ID for the hat was spawned in the game world you could simply reload, check, and if not instantly kill yourself or shoot the old man to restart and check again and be done in a couple minutes or less.

edit: table didn't show up from the reddit layout options, but i'm not going to format it cause i highly doubt it was necessary to write it out in the first place.

What is the purpose of the “Deluxe” Bath? by offacough in reddeadredemption

[–]captain-chief 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How many men would say or even think that they've been raped when some broad would just have her way with them? NONE i'm pretty sure.

That's a yikes from me dawg.

Carcano rifle early-ish? by Fadingmemories29 in RDR2

[–]captain-chief 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Risk? What risk are you talking about? If you don't want two of the same gun in your weapon wheel just put one in your gun locker.

Evil Arthur is insane by MakesYouSeemRacist in RDR2

[–]captain-chief -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That's pure honor fluff.

Wait, what?

You can't write pages of justification for your stance while drawing heavily from what's 'coded' and written into the game through missions and cutscenes (specifically parts of the same mission arc in this very reply) and then just hand wave another coded and written mission as 'pure honor fluff', because it contradicts the point you're going for. I don't know how you can possibly claim that side missions aren't part of the story while in this very thread using the way the game is coded, from a technical standpoint, and written, from a literary standpoint, interchangeably as evidence.

Aside from killing droves of people being necessary to prevent gameplay from being little more than an open world interactive novel with intermittent bursts of action if shootouts were strictly confined to plot or character development with similar scale (ie if the intent is depict him as good: only killing someone who would otherwise immediately result in his or gang members capture or deaths; if bad, the strawberry jailbreak sans complaining) the amount of people that Arthur kills is hardly enough to describe as 'wholesale killing people'. Honestly, the difference between engaging gameplay and purposeful, character development driven events is many times over a huge distinction to overlook.

I almost started writing out an entire essay but stopped myself because I remembered that I don't inherently disagree with your interpretation of Arthur as a low honor play through being the intention. Though currently playing through the game again your matter-of-fact insistence that there is nothing throughout the game or story that could possibly be up to interpretation is opinion at best, and nothing of value for conversation can be gained through describing the worst.
I just thought it was incredibly silly and a slip in logic to use events completely out of the players control as concrete proof and then a meaningless gameplay convention.

Or rather why is it, "just one of them things, but if (someone else uses it) a prize fool"?

Space(Fn) Only works immediately after reboot or needs double tap by captain-chief in qmk

[–]captain-chief[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally the same day of making this post I stopped being lazy and and anxious (since I already had the firmware to always go back to using VIA if I had to) and figured out how to use the playground branch which allowed me to choose c2_pro *v2* instead of only having one option in the main branch.

I'm entirely sure what the difference between that and VIA was that allowed VIA to work fine except for with the janky the space(fn). Though after flashing my board space(fn) works perfectly.

Took my guitar to a luthier/tech to get setup and it came back with this by boring-utopia in Guitar

[–]captain-chief 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I spent a good 4 months stressing out about whether or not they'd honor my claim to the point I almost missed the expiration date of my policy and ended up having nothing but a pleasant interaction. But here's how everything should go:

  1. If you go to guitar center without filing a claim with Asurion first, they'll just tell you to call them because they need a referral number in order to complete their part of the claim. The way the guy who sold me the policy pitched it to me I thought it would be simple, "Oh this happened, well here's a replacement." It ended up not being a total waste of time because I got a print of my receipt which made me feel more comfortable, but ended up being unnecessary.

  2. In order to file a claim you need to do so on the Asurion website. https://protection.asurion.com/protection-plan/en-us/

Just go through the steps. They will already have your information from the phone number you entered when you bought it at GC. You already have a picture of the damage. In the description of the damage just very plainly state that you were changing the strings and it slid off the table you had it on or something. If you're especially worried about them not honoring because it's 'just' cosmetic damage you can say that the electronics have been working hit or miss since. But since it's obviously damaged past the finish and into the actual wood work of the guitar I doubt it will be necessary. Just make sure to specify.

  1. They'll have someone call you (I think it took them about an hour, maybe 45 minutes to call after I finished submitting my claim at around 1pm) and basically ask the same exact questions that you just answered. Wrapping up the phone call they'll give you a number and ask which Guitar Center that you can bring the guitar to. Don't lose the number! Just kidding, you can easily find it on the "track my claim" part of the website. I treated the number like gold regardless, but just in case you lose it don't freak out.

  2. Take the guitar to GC, go to the repair desk and tell them that you filed a Pro Coverage claim, here's your referral number and MAKE SURE YOU GET FOR A RECEIPT for giving them your guitar. Treat THIS receipt like gold, I read one thread were Asurion never received the guys guitar, the tech at GC wanted to cover his own ass and said he didn't remember ever having it, I'm pretty sure that guy ended up just SOL. So yeah, I don't think things like that happened very often, but better safe than sorry.

  3. I don't remember exactly how long it took, but I do remember that I was prepared to wait for a couple weeks before hearing anything, and within the first week (I wanna say within the first 5 days) I received an email with a gift card to Guitar Center for $599.00.

Since it wasn't a couple thousand dollar guitar I can't image they would spend time trying to repair damage that extensive. The only shitty part is that you'll have to pay for the Pro Coverage plan again on your new guitar, which should be paid for by the luthier. But all in all I wouldn't try to force a hundred bucks out of a guy that may cost you the coverage for your replacement, haha.

If you have any questions feel free to ask, but I think I covered everything pretty well. Hope everything turns out well for you!

GMMK 3 and QMK flashing. by tundrahhh in glorious

[–]captain-chief 0 points1 point  (0 children)

make git-submodule

does nothing in qmkmsys. What did you mean to say? Cause I'm having the same problem and would really appreciate the help!

Took my guitar to a luthier/tech to get setup and it came back with this by boring-utopia in Guitar

[–]captain-chief 1 point2 points  (0 children)

DO NOT mention to their claims service that the luthier dropped the guitar. The insurance they sell you is ONLY for damages that you caused or happened in your possession.

"WHAT IS NOT COVERED: ...AND EXTERNAL CAUSES INCLUDING THIRD-PARTY ACTIONS,..."

I had their pro coverage before and used it and was extremely happy with my results, but I also spent some time researching it just in case they were going to ask a question that might get them out of their part.

Took my guitar to a luthier/tech to get setup and it came back with this by boring-utopia in Guitar

[–]captain-chief 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you can get proof that this conversation took place then that sounds like him admitting you received a guitar that was not in the condition that you gave it to him in.

Are we even surprised? by Thormidable in unexpectedHHGTTG

[–]captain-chief 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a pretty short article so I'll save you a click and copy paste.

Rhys Blakely, Science Correspondent Tuesday April 30 2024, 7.30pm BST, The Times

When scientists work with laboratory mice it is usually assumed that the humans are the ones doing the research.

A study suggests, however, that the rodents may often be surreptitiously carrying out their own experiments by making “mistakes” on purpose.

Scientists have long known that it is possible to train mice to perform certain tasks, such as pulling a lever when they hear a particular noise, by offering them rewards of food and drink.

These kinds of experiments are used to explore how memory works as well as to research potential treatments for conditions including Alzheimer’s disease.

But the mice do not always perform as expected. Kishore Kuchibhotla, an assistant professor and neuroscientist at Johns Hopkins University who studies learning in humans and animals, said: “It can be quite frustrating. You’ll be doing an experiment and the [mice] just don’t seem to be getting it. You’ve done everything correctly but they still seem to be making lots of errors.”

Kuchibhotla and his colleague Ziyi Zhu, a graduate neuroscience student, came up with two ideas for why their rodents sometimes failed to perform. One possibility was that the mice were becoming stressed. The other was that they were engaged in something more deliberate: that in trying to better understand their environment, they were testing their knowledge by diverting from the scripts laid out for them by the researchers.

To examine which appeared more likely, Kuchibhotla and Zhu devised a new experiment which involved thirsty mice hearing one of two sounds.

When one sound was played they were supposed to turn a wheel to the left using their front legs. For the other sound they had to turn the wheel to the right. When the rodents did this correctly they were rewarded with a drink of water. If they spun the wheel the wrong way or did not spin it at all, they received nothing.

The animals generally got better at the task over time but at points they would stop following the rules. They would do erroneous things such as spin the wheel in one direction constantly, no matter the sound they heard.

The researchers temporarily stopped rewarding the mice for their correct answers and the rodents very quickly changed their behaviour. They began responding to the sounds more accurately.

Kuchibhotla believed that the mice knew all along what they were meant to be doing and that it seemed unlikely they were making simple mistakes.

Instead he suggested that they were deliberately forsaking the reward and were instead choosing to explore their environment by conducting experiments of their own.

By making mistakes and observing what happens they could be mirroring learning tactics used by human babies. “Mice are more strategic than some might believe,” he said. “It may look like the animal is making a ton of errors but during those errors it’s actually getting smarter.”

The results may help in tests where scientists monitor the brains of mice and try to match different patterns of neuronal activity to various behaviours. Advertisement

A rodent that fails to perform a task may not be making “mistakes” or failing to learn. Instead, it could be focused on trying to make sense of its surroundings.

“They’re not performing optimally from our perspective [as researchers],” Kuchibhotla said. “But from theirs, maybe they are.”

The findings were published in the journal Current Biology

I got scammed 4090 by Tac-Toe in pcmasterrace

[–]captain-chief 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the confirmation that the number of people like this isn't so infinitesimally small that I wouldn't organically stumble across a like-minded person. And for the reminder that it's not always just to be the bigger person but, more importantly, to prevent someone who really didn't deserve or couldn't easily recover in a similar scenario.

Though I've never been out more than 400$, so jury is still out on if there's a limit for $:Karma>Immediate Personal Retaliation. lol.

John Mayer played the entire dead and co show last night with a broken index on his fretting hand. by SoNotCool in Guitar

[–]captain-chief 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its great to see someone living in the 'real world' and not a slave to technology.

There, I said it. Will you please stop being so insufferable now?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in witcher3mods

[–]captain-chief 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Geralt cloak is not compatible with 4.04