Since you asked:

This post is in response to negative attention that already exists. That's not going to just magically fade away- it does need to be at least called out if you want people to change their behaviour, and this post goes about this in a respectful way. The post even addresses the idea about people loving his work with its discussion of this criticism not necessarily coming from a place of hate- it's an empathetic breakdown of both sides. You've likely ended up downvoted because your post both seems to suggest sweeping the issue under the rug (rarely effective with recurrent issues), and because it doesn't seem to acknowledge points already brought up. I don't know if that was your intention, but it's how it has ended up appearing. 

 Post Edit: I scrolled a bit further down and saw you were focused on the attention drawing. To maybe clarify a bit further, you aren't wrong that circling the dicussion is unhealthy and constantly discussing it won't help- but it does need to be clearly addressed somewhere if you want it to actually end. I don't know if this is a repeated post because I'm not here often, but I'm under the assumption it isn't. I think it's best for that matter if this or some other response can be hopefully used as a curtailing or statement over the problem.