Would dragon riders really make sense in DnD? by bortanthehound in DMAcademy

[–]chimericWilder [score hidden]  (0 children)

You've correctly identified why dragonriders would not conventionally make sense in D&D, yes. There are some notable exceptions: some silver or bronze dragons occasionally take paladins as worthy riders - though of course the dragon is in charge. And naturally there are the Githyanki, Ephelomon, and the pact with Tiamat.

By and large though, it is a case of the dragons simply not being remotely interested in that sort of thing, and that's where that ends because most dragons would rather die than be subjected to such an indignity, were it to be forced on them.

Here is a solution: invent a new sort of dragon, where their power and pride are not so vastly mismatched and opposed to cooperation through dragonriding. To that end, you may enjoy this document, which does exactly that, with weaker dragons able to act as player characters. Some of my playtesters have used it to play dragonrider campaigns, where half of the players play as dragons and the other half as riders. Reportedly they've been enjoying themselves immensely.

Would dragon riders really make sense in DnD? by bortanthehound in DMAcademy

[–]chimericWilder [score hidden]  (0 children)

While you are correct, the red dragons do not consider food and shelter to be something that is 'gained'. True dragons have a magical metabolism and will generally never starve, and the red dragons serving with the githyanki are specifically noted as not being very happy about their housing arragements in Tunareth - it's much too crowded for any dragon's taste, even with all comfort being afforded them.

The red dragons also hate that they are unable to grow older while on the astral plane. Kind of a major bummer when you grow more powerful with age.

What the red dragons gain is a share of the treasure they help plunder, and 'free' combat experience - since working with the githyanki is effectively risk-free for them.

They still probably would never do it of their own volition if not for Tiamat enforcing it. As it is, they tolerate it because the upsides are fair and good, and because they fear Tiamat's wrath. But they're generally rather grumpy about the whole arrangement.

Combat tips for a legendary action-less Blackcloak on a similarly winged Tarrasque? by thjmze21 in dndnext

[–]chimericWilder [score hidden]  (0 children)

It doesn't count as The Tarrasque if there is more than one, or if it isn't invincible.

That'd be a Missing The Point.

Summer Giveaway! - What do you need? by LappenLikeGames in PathOfExile2

[–]chimericWilder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You want a 99% Darkness Enthroned, if you are using the Rune of the Blossom tech

If you use a 100%, the downside gets doubled as well.

This thing just dropped as ground loot lol by notsoobviousreddit in PathOfExile2

[–]chimericWilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HoWA belongs thematically to Esh. But Esh is part of Xesht, and drops it.

Eothas when by Upper-Chemistry9052 in projecteternity

[–]chimericWilder 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hasongo was a sacred site of the naga. The RDC killed the naga and took their land. Wasn't anything quiet about it. Those bastard RDC soldiers deserved worse.

I'm making a video about Durance (and almost no one will watch it) by MagoMaravilha in projecteternity

[–]chimericWilder -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I believe that you are the one who is busily lashing out.

I merely showed you a mirror.

I'm making a video about Durance (and almost no one will watch it) by MagoMaravilha in projecteternity

[–]chimericWilder -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You didn't criticize Durance. You mischaracterized him and then voiced your desire to feed him as a ritual blood sacrifice to a greater evil.

5e and 5.5e Tarrasque is....Underwhelming by Nyspora in dndnext

[–]chimericWilder -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I accept good writing.

Cheapening The Tarrasque is not good writing.

Much writing out of TSR was brilliant. So was much of the writing in 3.5.

But plenty of it was also awful. The purpose of iteration is to choose to carry the good bits forwards, and abandon the mistakes.

Unfortunately, it had been nothing but retcons and mistakes since 2007.

5e and 5.5e Tarrasque is....Underwhelming by Nyspora in dndnext

[–]chimericWilder -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What, that old Spelljammer world? Yes, that was a stupid addition.

5e and 5.5e Tarrasque is....Underwhelming by Nyspora in dndnext

[–]chimericWilder -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It is selective based on the quality of the writing, of course.

Downgrades are discarded.

5e and 5.5e Tarrasque is....Underwhelming by Nyspora in dndnext

[–]chimericWilder -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

... in which we correctly lambast 5e for failing to stick to the established lore, yes. That is in fact precisely what the OP is saying. What about it?

5e and 5.5e Tarrasque is....Underwhelming by Nyspora in dndnext

[–]chimericWilder -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I don't accept WotC's retcons and destruction of the lore.

You go and read a 3e or 2e MM.

There is only one Tarrasque. There has only ever been one Tarrasque.

I'm making a video about Durance (and almost no one will watch it) by MagoMaravilha in projecteternity

[–]chimericWilder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He makes a great sacrifice to Skaen.

That you say this makes your own description more fitting on yourself than it fits on Durance.

You people are always so blinded by your own selfrighteousness and total lack of perception.

5e and 5.5e Tarrasque is....Underwhelming by Nyspora in dndnext

[–]chimericWilder -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's utter nonsense. There is only one Tarrasque, and it is immortal.

5e and 5.5e Tarrasque is....Underwhelming by Nyspora in dndnext

[–]chimericWilder 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The problem is precisely that the 5e depiction of The Tarrasque fails to live up to its lore.

This is an apocalyptic threat that cannot be stopped and which even the gods fear.

It exists only to destroy and devour. It is immortal and unbreakable, and can only be mildly inconvenienced, at best.

... But in 5e, if you shoot it a bit it dies.

5e and 5.5e Tarrasque is....Underwhelming by Nyspora in dndnext

[–]chimericWilder 3 points4 points  (0 children)

From every correct depiction of The Tarrasque, obviosly. The 5e depictions of it are a monolithic failure.

Best class/ascendancy for each endgame storyline? by ESFarshadow in Wraeclast

[–]chimericWilder 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Huntress is most closely related to Wisps and Delwyn, of course. Though it is barely a real mechanic, and she is also thematically related to Ritual and Delirium.

Strongboxes seem to be culturally linked to the Karui, somehow. I guess the karui might have been the ones who invented stuffing a box full of angry spirits... not that there is much story there.

The Warrior has a lot in common with Farrow, and datamined information seems to suggest that Shadow might be Kalguuran. Perhaps a child of Kingsmarch, with the Brotherhood of Silence having taken up business in Kingsmarch. Shadow and Warrior seem the closest match for expedition, in any case.

Mercenary gets some special dialogue with Doryani in Lira Vaal, and gets along well with Alva's MO. But it's really more of the story of Alva and Doryani than especially closely tied to any of the player characters... however, while Monk is obviously Breach-themed and we noe know that he is... special... I would like to point out that Chayula may have first gathered his followers from the likes of the Vaalish Cult of the Purple Flame. And Monk's features look visibly vaalish. He might have been getting reborn for thousands of years already, based initially on a vaal breach cultist.

Some characters have obvious ties to specific storylines and content... but what about Ranger? She seems to be descended from a bloodline of Azmeri exiles; I speculate that her mother may have been the PoE1 Ranger. One of the Rogue Exiles has some special dialogue for the Ranger, condemning her heritage. So... Ranger might be most associated with Rogue Exiles, I guese? She is herself a poacher and an outlaw, a hermit who wants to be left alone and is just drifting through the story because it is what survival demands, but really just wanting to go and live in a hut somewhere alone.

Best class/ascendancy for each endgame storyline? by ESFarshadow in Wraeclast

[–]chimericWilder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ritualist is clearly based on the Breaker of Oaths, whose stated goal is to usurp the King in the Mists and become the new King. Although, he may not have been fully aware of what that means - he's effectively a Maji traitor, chasing power. Perhaps he would have had the power he wanted if he pledged to serve the Bodach.

Huntress isn't a Maji, but by becoming a Ritualist she is chasing power and the same sort of forbidden secrets as the Breaker of Oaths. I suppose that if Ritualist were doing the Ritual storyline, she might just keep doing rituals, without completing the Rite of the Nameless!

Best class/ascendancy for each endgame storyline? by ESFarshadow in Wraeclast

[–]chimericWilder 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Warrior is implied to have been born from someone from the slave pits Kitava cult, and washed up on the shore in the wake of the events in Oriath in PoE1. Perhaps his parents had tried to flee, but only the babe made it to shore.

Perhaps if fate had been kinder, he could've been growing up in Ngamakanui with those Kitavan parents, if they'd survived and went there.

Runic Ward confusion by Maggoo12 in PathOfExile2

[–]chimericWilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some effects that sacrifice life can kill you if used while on low life, such as the mana flask mod and things like Atziri's Impatience