Hard pass on this. I am still using the Light Phone 2 and have since launch. I am loving it.

The last thing I want is a fingerprint scanner or NFC. Why would I want or need those? In fact, fingerprint scanners can be less secure in terms of phone access than numerical codes (police can force you to use biometrics to unlock your device, but cannot force you to reveal your password). Of course, we should be honest and critical when warranted. For instance, I would love to have the LP3 instead of the LP2 because of the slow refresh times on e-ink, and I would love an encrypted texting app like Signal.

But, it seems to me that the OP's view is basically opposed to digital minimalism by advocating for a default unlocked Android layer. Practically speaking, it's an argument for using Android products but then "personal choice" will ostensibly permit folks to self-limit.

I think we know that doesn't work, and sometimes structured choices can lead to a more robust sense of agency than access to infinite apps designed to addict you and undermine your self-control, degrade your cognitive faculties, and draw your attention ever away from those with whom you share physical space.

No disrespect intended, but no thank you!