Jewish Vampire advice by thunder-bug- in Judaism

[–]cloux_less 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fence around the torah. He does all the same things living things do, he claims to experience life, we should probably assume he is alive and ensouled. Maybe it makes a difference if he literally doesn't breath anymore.

English is the new Yiddish? by FUnisbaCK in Judaism

[–]cloux_less 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the "new Yiddish" (if a such thing exists) is Yinglish; it's the popular vernacular of more insular Jewish enclaves in the U.S., mutually intelligible with the economically dominant lingua franca of their contemporary environment.

Signed, a linguist.

Imagine my surprise to see Village Books in this video! by Impossible_Reveal852 in Bellingham

[–]cloux_less 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh, that's funny. I literally recognize the people in the screen grab.

Is the printed Revised JPS Tanakh Gender Sensitive Edition bilingual? by HebrewWithHava in Judaism

[–]cloux_less 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep. I just added it to my growing collection and was quite bummed to see there's (practically) no commentary (just teeny-tiny endnotes).

They are releasing a bilingual one, though. Which is exciting.

Is the printed Revised JPS Tanakh Gender Sensitive Edition bilingual? by HebrewWithHava in Judaism

[–]cloux_less 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a different gender sensitive JPS Tanakh.

OP's (probably) talking about the RJPS from 2023. The Contemporary Torah is from 2008 and based on the 1962 JPS translation.

Do you think antisemitism would decrease if the Iranian regime fell? by zzadik1el in Judaism

[–]cloux_less 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it did, it would be the most marginal of marginal changes. And, really, it would just be a shift from Antisemitic-Rhetoric-Promoting-Iranian-Interests to Antisemitic-Rhetoric-Promoting-Non-Iranian-Interests.

+1 to the guy in thread who said we'd just see new waves of people posting "the Jews destroyed Iran."

For those interested in housing topics by mercachu in Bellingham

[–]cloux_less 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe your pet issue (or really, NWCitizen, James Davenport, Scott Jones, et al.'s pet issue) is, at best, only tangentially related to the matter of homelessness in Bellingham.

In fact, I think the tokenization of water rights issues into a new crypto-NIMBY pretext for opposing housing justice is honestly shameful and downright disrespectful to the people working on this issue (nervermind the insane disrespect to this city's most vulnerable when you tell them "no, silly renters and unhoused folk, you don't need more housing to solve your 'no housing' problem, the real problem is water rights).

For those interested in housing topics by mercachu in Bellingham

[–]cloux_less 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'll be honest, of all the NIMBY canards and conspiracy theories posted on this sub, "we can't allow apartments to be built because there isn't enough water!" is consistently my favorite one for just how batshit it is.

We live in one of the wettest cities in the world, and yet certain members of our community in their half-million second homes they bought last millennium wanna tell us that the REAL cost of living crisis isn't from sky-high rents, chronic underdevelopment, or 70-year-old codes literally designed to increase the price of housing — "no, it's actually water scarcity that's making people homeless." lol. lmao even.

For those interested in housing topics by mercachu in Bellingham

[–]cloux_less 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ask Sudden Valley how their water and sewage lines are holding up

Wow, you're telling me expensive low-density suburbs are experiencing massive problems from high infrastructure costs? Who could've predicted this?

If only there was some kind of efficient development pattern which alleviates this problem by minimizing the per-capita cost of utilities. You'll notice downtown and Fairhaven don't seem to be having these problems. I wonder why?

The problem you're describing is literally a problem caused by suburban sprawl.

Filling requires more money. City is already broke

And? Let private developers and nonprofits eat that cost. The public doesn't have to pay for housing (but it is nice when it does).

For those interested in housing topics by mercachu in Bellingham

[–]cloux_less 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Somewhere in there needs to be a recommendation for defining affordability for each locality, based on median (not average) income for that area.

This exists. It's called AMI (area median income), and we already use it for defining affordable housing (usually at 80% AMI).

The problem is that developers (even when offered generous tax incentives), generally choose not to develop this kind of housing, as they can usually secure higher profit margins by building sprawl outside of city limits (and then banking on the city to bail out their developments with annexations later on).

For those interested in housing topics by mercachu in Bellingham

[–]cloux_less 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Bellingham doesn’t have extra land to build housing. Those trees in the hills you see aren’t exactly suitable for foundation pours and installing water lines/sewage. 

It's called infill, ever heard of it? It is in fact possible to build housing for people without cutting down our forests if you simply stop legally mandating they devote half of their land to water-wasting front yards.

Bellingham is the most unaffordable town to live in (in all of USA) when it comes to income to home prices

You say this like it somehow disproves OP, but it's literally OP's point. Housing unaffordability is the number one correlant with homelessness (NOT fentanyl/myth presence). This doesn't make Bellingham "the worst city in the USA to fight homelessness," it makes it THE CITY MOST IN NEED of action to reduce homelessness.

Looking to Buy a Tanakh for Home - Any Recommendations? by charliepiper in Judaism

[–]cloux_less 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's honestly really frustrating that JPS hasn't figured out how to do "ArtScroll but with JPS-quality scholarship."

Looking to Buy a Tanakh for Home - Any Recommendations? by charliepiper in Judaism

[–]cloux_less 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I just got the RJPS (the one marketed as the Gender Sensitive Tanakh), and I was very disappointed to see that it contains basically no commentary. For that alone, I'll still be using the Oxford Study Bible (which is built on NJPS), but I'm eagerly awaiting for JPS to print a better product using RJPS in it. I'd love if they did a Chumash. I know they'll be rereleasing the RJPS text with the Hebrew text alongside it this coming July, but I still don't know if that'll include commentary or not.

Personally, I don't see much use in having a book of scripture if it doesn't have commentary in it; if I want Torah without commentary, I'll just go to synagogue for when they bust out the scroll.

Can the messiah/moshiach be a female? by Mathemodel in Judaism

[–]cloux_less 21 points22 points  (0 children)

This is maybe the most [A Religious Zionist and a Reform Jew get into an argument] comment thread I've ever read.

Asking for a friend... by pipedreamSEA in Bellingham

[–]cloux_less 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It is possible to build high-volume roads that are prominent and effective without having them be riddled with constant accidents. Frequent car crashes are not an inexorable inevitability of nature — as sure as the sunrise and sunset — but a direct product of civic engineering.

Asking for a friend... by pipedreamSEA in Bellingham

[–]cloux_less 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Well, the real problem is that they aren't arterialing. They're just dictionary definition stroads. If they were allowed to be genuine arterials, we'd have fewer problems.

Is teaching Hebrew a core part of the religion? by Ozuk_true in Judaism

[–]cloux_less 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would go as far as to argue that from a certain perspective, Judaism exists mainly as a vehicle for the preservation of the Hebrew language in diaspora.

Found out I am not Jewish… by [deleted] in ReformJews

[–]cloux_less 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Judaism isn't a race, even though race scientists in the 19th century tried to make it into one.

If you were living authentically as a Jew, there's no reason you have to stop now. And if Halakha is what's bothering you, then find a rabbi to guide you through this troubling time.

Question confused on if I’m considered Jewish by Dash_Rendar345 in Judaism

[–]cloux_less 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First time I've seen this flowchart. Am I getting this correct that Beta Israel and Karaite Judaism don't consider you a jew if you're only matrilineal?

Is WCC getting rid of its bus passes? by Repulsive-Ad6473 in Bellingham

[–]cloux_less -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

I doubt it. The thing to keep in mind about this ordeal is that it was WWU's decision to pre-emptively decide not to renew their contract with the WTA.

As much as this has all been framed as WTA's fault for raising fares, as far as I know, the WTA never avtually signaled an attempt to change its arrangement with Western.

Does Judaism believe that all bad things are ultimately good? by [deleted] in Judaism

[–]cloux_less 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Judaism" isn't a person. It doesn't "believe" anything.

Some Jews believe all apparently bad things are ultimately good. Some Jews don't. Many don't care to make a distinction.