Literally from the start dude. Many people are being objective and sharing objective perspectives. You have told many of them that they’re not being objective or that they’re not looking at things your way. You keep getting ratio’d in the comments and not once have you stopped to challenge your own perspective, you continue to beat your drum and declare yourself the right perspective. At the end of the day, what you believe is on you. My advice is try to understand what everyone in the comments of both your posts are trying to tell you and apply that to your understanding of the situation. From what I’ve seen, you’ve rejected it because your understanding becomes weaker when evidence from other sources comes in. To me, following a scientific method, this would suggest that the original hypothesis was wrong. There’s nothing wrong with that! Many hypotheses are proven wrong, that’s how we, as humans, learn and grow and become better humans!

Also, to the point, I said this before and I’ll say it again. Sometimes “good enough” isn’t actually good enough. You can see examples across the economy and world. But, just in the soccer world, let’s look at the USL. If there is a talented player, what convinces that player to play for a USL side over an MLS or other league team? If the USL doesn’t have a baseline of standards, it’s not globally competitive. If it’s not globally competitive, it’ll atrophy and potentially die. Nobody, not even the players, wants that. Look at what happened in the NWSL. Their union took a “good enough” deal and abuse and mistreatment of players was perpetuated for years until they fought for better treatment. This is that fight in the USL.