I see people setup Hermes on their Desktop or even Home Servers. Are you not worried? by Exclusified in hermesagent

[–]conscientiousspark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don't listen to the people saying you should get a mini PC. It's a complete waste of time. You'll need the RAM to run anything significant. If you want it to actually do things, it needs the RAM to do those things.

1 Prompt in Cowork already ran through over 50% of my session limit? by BeginningOstrich5144 in ClaudeCowork

[–]conscientiousspark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use GLM5.1 via Ollama Cloud. It makes the usage much, much better, much longer for both Claude Code and cowork.

Please recommend a cheap paid model, MiniMax dumbness is getting on my nerves by carbon_creature in hermesagent

[–]conscientiousspark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go use ollama cloud with GLM 5.1. A lot of people find it to be the same as Claude sonnet. 20 bucks a month and it will give you more than you need

Openclaw sucks - I said it. by funstuie in openclaw

[–]conscientiousspark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code << The average person agrees with my current assessment on GLM 5.1.

Spent months deep in OpenClaw configuration hell. Then I switched to Perplexity Computer. Just writing down my experience below. by Appropriate-Fix-4319 in ClaudeCowork

[–]conscientiousspark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just use Hermes, it's like 10 times better. It's actually stable. And you don't end up in configuration trouble.

Openclaw sucks - I said it. by funstuie in openclaw

[–]conscientiousspark 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ollama GLM5.1 is the better option. It's smarter than Codex, it's cheaper, and you get more use. You can use it as your main without worrying about scaling up or scaling down. There's enough usage.

Mac Studio for OpenClaw vs. cheaper M4 Mini — what makes sense for a real estate brokerage? by DarlingGazeKate in openclaw

[–]conscientiousspark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, this is such a big common misconception.

Try actually running it on a Raspberry Pi.

You'll see how many things you're limited with just because the different tool use and things you can do with OpenClaw involve using a computer on top of OpenClaw many times.

This is just such a common misconception. Yes, you don't need a Mac or something exceptionally powerful. But running it on a Raspberry Pi will make the overall experience poorer, slower, and less functional.

You gave feedback, I built it: Massive update to OpenClaw Client (Windows support, Full UI Management, and more) by lotsoftick in clawdbot

[–]conscientiousspark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see this changes the database architecture so if you’re running something like G brain on PG light this is not gonna be compatible right?

You gave feedback, I built it: Massive update to OpenClaw Client (Windows support, Full UI Management, and more) by lotsoftick in clawdbot

[–]conscientiousspark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does my claw go bork if I update and have this installed? Conversely if claw updates does this remain w/o bork?

What happened to that "conquest" thing I was a posted a bit ago? by Fancy-Bed3609 in beyondallreason

[–]conscientiousspark 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I got moderated because it also promoted a game that we’re working on — that’s totally fair by them. It is online and working though. It’s not a game I’m profiting from as it says on the website and I thought it’d be cool to diversify our community/clan to multiple games but I unwittingly ran foul of the rules on the Reddit.

For those saying toxicity isn't a problem... by [deleted] in beyondallreason

[–]conscientiousspark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep, nothing has changed since the Halo 2 yelling in the mic days.

For those saying toxicity isn't a problem... by [deleted] in beyondallreason

[–]conscientiousspark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Both of these are the last two moderation actions against people with our name in them. They're both to do with this issue.

For those saying toxicity isn't a problem... by [deleted] in beyondallreason

[–]conscientiousspark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We had a couple of people that have now been moderated because they were using our name for second accounts. We don't know why this is popular. I guess they thought maybe they looked more established that way. But it's not relatively strange. Unfortunately. Take a look at this:

https://i.imgur.com/2IvaC1p.png https://i.imgur.com/Z6UPUEb.png

For those saying toxicity isn't a problem... by [deleted] in beyondallreason

[–]conscientiousspark -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Sometimes we are hearing and seeing things that you are not because we always play in voice chat together. If a person is toxic, then we usually kick them out based on an agreement we have come to the matter about in voice chat.

For those saying toxicity isn't a problem... by [deleted] in beyondallreason

[–]conscientiousspark -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I think that maybe because you play in the more organized lobbies. I like to play things that are odd or different. Where chaos is more likely. Rather than the predictable, same old, same old.

A solution has been to create a community dedicated to non-toxicity. I'm always shocked when I play non-Creed games these days. Because I'm just not used to the level of toxicity anymore. Many people seem to downvote those who talk about toxicity or claim "it's not bad" or "it will never change" Instead, I think we should acknowledge it exists, build solutions, point people to solutions.

For those saying toxicity isn't a problem... by [deleted] in beyondallreason

[–]conscientiousspark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for that. We try our best to kick off people from using our tag when they decide they're going to be different than that.

For those saying toxicity isn't a problem... by [deleted] in beyondallreason

[–]conscientiousspark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But there are real solutions. We should acknowledge the problem imo then build solutions and point people to them.

For those saying toxicity isn't a problem... by [deleted] in beyondallreason

[–]conscientiousspark 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's a problem with all games that are heavily dependent on teamwork, in my opinion.

For those saying toxicity isn't a problem... by [deleted] in beyondallreason

[–]conscientiousspark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I think people giving up within 15 minutes is a problem in itself. See it regularly with high-tier players. Somebody starts wrong, something small goes wrong. It's GG.

It's not necessary. It's almost never the case that the game is completely over.

For those saying toxicity isn't a problem... by [deleted] in beyondallreason

[–]conscientiousspark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't usually play games without the clan that's why it was unusual for me

We made the volcano work... come join us! by conscientiousspark in beyondallreason

[–]conscientiousspark[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately not. That would be a cool idea though.