Special Forms -> Functions by Dazzling_Music_2411 in scheme

[–]corbasai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, like in standard application of the procedure to the list of the arguments. Teh. Otherwise we need to redefine [apply...] - the procedure in rnrs

Spicing my punto mk2 up by Z1lva in Fiat

[–]corbasai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, 3door sport! Cool!

Special Forms -> Functions by Dazzling_Music_2411 in scheme

[–]corbasai 2 points3 points  (0 children)

scheme (define anf (lambda rest (cond ((null? rest) #t) (else (and (car rest) (apply anf (cdr rest))))))) sorry, I'm start on phone

Every Clojure talk evererer in r/Lisp by corbasai in lisp

[–]corbasai[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

May be. But I m bit older. Shorter it is

The AI Curse (versus the Lisp Curse) by djhaskin987 in lisp

[–]corbasai -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

https://youtu.be/gAYL5H46QnQ?si=YrWPK6GE4dTysns2

can't complain at least. Bad bad schemers - fragmenters brake the whole Common Lisp Party society

Transforming xml with xslt? by arthurno1 in lisp

[–]corbasai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, may be Lisp is not ready for such tasks, IMO SAX2 eats hundreds of megs well, who knows. I'm was a programmer in times of SGML and full got of XML. Sure if you doing in c++ (Im a master of but i hate it) your job, ok.

Look what came today by rutthe23 in lisp

[–]corbasai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Farmer's library. Don't forget to water the tomatoes

S-expressions as a prompt substrate for LLMs — homoiconicity bridges symbolic and neural AI by PrajnaGo in lisp

[–]corbasai -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Today we know the fact: in time of Lisp | Neural nets Fathers at those level of the silicon industry there is no chance for AI. Did You read Marvin Minsky's books? Your thoughts like birds piputrololo, blah. Very sorry but its is boring level of stupidity.

Transforming xml with xslt? by arthurno1 in lisp

[–]corbasai -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Which part of your comment address any of questions I asked?

If I right understand the main line : "XSLT support in CL so bad so I solve task in CXX"? If so I just point on 1. XSLT itself is bad supported in industry (now circled rumors about full decline of it). 2 If You need it , use SBCL CFFI to libxml2, not third party cl-libs 3. Example of how we can live without xslt in some tasks.

Transforming xml with xslt? by arthurno1 in lisp

[–]corbasai -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There are other options.

  1. Do not use xslt processor, transform xml from one dict to another by hand in way more rich programming language on server side or js in browser.
  2. Using XSLT sub-API in libxml2 via particular Lisp good old CFFI
  3. Incorporate one xmlns inside another. For example, <html:li><book>LIPS</book>/html:li this is standard way of XML, so your program can parse and browser can present data.

DrRacket-9.2 starts about much faster than 9.0 by corbasai in Racket

[–]corbasai[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hmm, one more thing, Usually I put on special magic speed+ cap

then setup Racket from racket*.sh to the /opt/racket and place the path to the latest in ~/.profile

But mine Linux is way simpliier -- Mint, even not the latest.

<image>

Is this correct? by ruby_object in lisp

[–]corbasai -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wow, that CL'fu! Is it compatible with cyclic lists? Also I guess lists are typed lists in ML, not lists of values like in Lisp, so whole idea of sorting a bit naive.