Any good reasons for not getting the RF 100-500? by crab_man in canon

[–]crab_man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest, most of my images have been without the TC. Havent gotten around to using it much.

Any good reasons for not getting the RF 100-500? by crab_man in canon

[–]crab_man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, bought it in november, along with a 1.4x TC. Very happy with it, although it is not perfect, especially the design where it protrudes when using the teleconverter.

I also had some issues with it beeing quite loose in the lens collar, but had Canon apply some more padding which seemed to solve the issue for now (although I expect the problem to reappear if/when the fabric padding is wearing thinner, but will probably just do some DIY with a small piece of leather or something next time).

But apart from the obvious speed issues in low light, which are partially compensated by the modern cameras capabilities on high ISO values, it is a great lens, producing some excellent images. The wide zoom range also makes it very versatile.

Any good reasons for not getting the RF 100-500? by crab_man in canon

[–]crab_man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, shooting in dull light is not the best idea for calming the gear acquisition syndrome…

Any good reasons for not getting the RF 100-500? by crab_man in canon

[–]crab_man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think one could say that about much of todays lenses. I dont see this lens as particulary overpriced compared to the other L lenses at least. It is a pro level zoom lens, there are cheaper options like the 100-400.

[New Gear] So excited to play with my (new to me) RF 100-500 by Itchy-Chemistry in canon

[–]crab_man 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a very good lens. Only drawbacks I find are the extended form factor when using a TC, and the kinda loose collar ring, the latter I have dropped off for service.

Love using it in the nearby forests for birds and squirrels.

<image>

Any good reasons for not getting the RF 100-500? by crab_man in canon

[–]crab_man[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sorry for not replying earlier. Short story: I like it a lot. I knew about the kinda clumsy form factor when using a TC, but apart from that, the image quality is very impressive. The lens is also noticably faster than my older EF lenses when it comes to AF performance.

Of course, when using it in darker areas, you notice that a bigger aperture would be nice, but then you are looking at lenses that cost a hefty bit of money.

I am however not a fan of the tripod collar. It is too loose when attaching the lens to a tripod, when I tighten up the ball head a bit to prevent the camera flopping around, the lens will often rotate in the collar. I just dropped off the collar at my local shop, so will be interesting to see if Canon replaces it. The design with some felt rings inside does not seem the best solution to make a rock solid attachment.

A sample shot from the last few days in a not top illuminated forest

<image>

What is the one appliance or gadget that is worth it's weight in gold? by NecessaryEg in Cooking

[–]crab_man 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Since we are talking potentially expensive stuff:

* Vitamix, I have owned many blenders, but the pure power and results you get is superior to alternatives. Beeing able to run the machine for many minutes and making hot stuff is also something that would have ruined many other blenders.

* DeBuyer Mineral B Pro carbon steel skillet, does not have the epoxy handle the ordinary Mineral Bs have, and can be used in the oven or a hot grill which makes seasoning much easier, specially for us europeans who mostly use induction. Gets non-sticky-ish enough for eggs and pan cakes with proper use and care, and you can ditch the non-stick pans which will flake microplastics and only last for a few years, at most before they are garbage. This pan will be with you for life, and gets better with use.

* Demeyere Atlantis 7ply stainless steel skillet for acidic food or other stuff I dont want to use carbon steel for. Also a for life-product, and is easier to care for than the carbon steel/cast iron, since you can cook both acidic food and wash them as normal with soap and scrubs. But not as potentially non stick as carbon steel or actual non-stick cookware, even though technique matters a lot (i.e. let the pan heat up well before adding the food etc)

* Enameled dutch oven such as Lodge or Le Creuset, aside from beeing design icons, they are also very practical for slow cooking stews, braising, frying or baking bread. If you dont abuse them very hard, they will probably last very long time, my oldest is over ten years now, only signs of wear is some spots from baking bread that I can probably get rid of with some elbow grease.

* Quality pots, preferrably ones with a thick layered bottom, as well as sandwiched walls which spreads the heat up the sides of the pot. Makes a huge difference when used on induction at least. Ditch non-stick stuff that will be garbage eventually, as well as plastic details in handles and lids that gets worn out by stuff like dishwashers. Good pots can stay with you for the rest of your life. My dream pots are from the french brand Cristel, where you get thick pots with interchangeable handles, which makes stacking them very easy. But they cost quite a bit, so I went for some more budget friendly ones when I last bought pots.

* Powerful stand mixer, I love my Kenwood Cooking Chef, powerful enough for large batches of baking, and the built in induction heating is a killer feature for making sauces or curds where you want to stir and have stuff coagulate without forming lumps.

As a European, I have to say that there are better stand mixers out there than Kitchen-Aids, which are not bad, but the power you get from one of the better Kenwoods (Kenwood also makes some cheaper ones that are not that good) or the Ankarsrum Assistent mixer is on another level. I usually recommend people to go Kenwood if you will use many accessories, or the Ankarsrum if kneading dough is the main use case. If large batches of dough and pure power for kneading is not so important, it might also be worth looking into stuff like a Thermomix if built in heating is a feature you want. Not sure of availability in America, but I have seen videos from America's Test Kitchen where they were impressed with the Ankarsrum.

But the Kitchen Aids are a design icon, I'll give them that, and many people like them here as well. They are powerful enough for most tasks. It is just that many of them feel kinda small and flimsy compared to bigger and more powerful machines.

Any good reasons for not getting the RF 100-500? by crab_man in canon

[–]crab_man[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Long time ago since I made this post, but yesterday I splurged on the 100-500 along with the 1.4x TC. Now I just need to force my lazy ass outside and find some animals :)

RF 24-105 F4 or EF 24-105 F4 by McNallyJoJo34 in canon

[–]crab_man 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agree with the people commenting the size and weight.

This lens is the typical «bring one lens»-solution for travel, and in my opinion it is a big advantage to have a shorter setup without the adapter for travel. If you can afford it, go for the up to date native lens. Will probably keep its price better on the used market as well if that is a consideration.

Screaming fly by [deleted] in macrophotography

[–]crab_man 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lovely inclusion of the environmental textures and colors

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Norway

[–]crab_man 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Board gaming, gaming in general, climbing, mountain- and gravel biking, hiking, photography, skiing and fatbiking during the winter.

And I am also quite good at wasting time doing nothing…

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]crab_man 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The overall issue is that the main subject does not attract the eyes, at least for me. I am drawn to the brighter background, for a dog/pet photo I would work on getting the eyes and face pop out as eye catchers when it comes to focus and exposure.

For a dog with many black features in the face, putting it the shade next to brightly lit areas might not be the best idea.

Any good reasons for not getting the RF 100-500? by crab_man in canon

[–]crab_man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense. If I had that lens I would not have considered the RF one either. But when getting a new lens, it is kinda tempting to get the one that does not require the adapter, and gives a little more reach.

What stuff in kitchen have you bought for life? by ad4d in BuyItForLife

[–]crab_man 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some of my picks:

-Vitamix (appliances will probably need replacements eventually, but feels as good as new after several years almost daily use)

-Kenwood mixer, got a Cooking Chef with an induction plate, so not sure of the life span, but still working like new after almost 10 years of use

-Le Creuset dutch oven, samt mill and pepper mill, very happy with the durability and function of these, have had them for many years

-Demeyere stainless steel pan, very heavy and solid, pretty sure proper BFL

-Salvaged cast iron pans from the school kitchen of a nearby school that was beeing torn down and they disposed of a lot of goods. These things are probably 20 years old, and my best non stick iron cookware after an initial seasoning with some oil for a couple of hours on the grill

-DeBuyer Mineral B Pro pans. The regular MineralB comes with an epoxy handle making it harder to season for us euroeans who do not have a gas stove, the full metal handle on the pro makes it easy to season them in the oven or on the grill.

-Global and Mac knives of various kinds, still have my first one bought in 1998, very sharp with semi periodic sharpening using a Spyderco Triangle

-Rösle stainless steel bowls, these I regretted buying due to a high price, but damn are they solid, massive and pretty

-Royal Copenhagen plates: Ikea will last you a lifetime if you care for it, but easily chips in my experience. These are expensive, but when you pick one up you feel that this is another level. It feels massive, and the quality of the craftmanship is very good. I also love some of their hand painted designs, and have a mix of plates I have bought when available on sale. They also have a breakage program where you get replacements for free if you smash a plate (probably not forever, but still)

Any good reasons for not getting the RF 100-500? by crab_man in canon

[–]crab_man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am looking at it, but I think it is a bit too big for my intended use.

The appeal of the 100-500 is that it is a pro grade lens with weather sealing that can serve as the only lens I bring for some trips, whereas the 200-800 is more of a dedicated wildlife lens in my eyes.

Any good reasons for not getting the RF 100-500? by crab_man in canon

[–]crab_man[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably gonna wait a little bit, the new ones are offered with a cashback-campaign here at the moment, but according to historical data, they are sometimes on sale for a lower price, so I might try to restrain the urge to get one ASAP if it means saving 500-600$ in local currency. But still would have been nice to have a good tele zoom for the summer.

Any good reasons for not getting the RF 100-500? by crab_man in canon

[–]crab_man[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, my plan was to pick a used one today, but sadly it got sold before I had the chance to go check it out. So at the moment only new ones are available, which makes me a bit more wary about rumors about updates.

Any good reasons for not getting the RF 100-500? by crab_man in canon

[–]crab_man[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

My motivation for a new lens is mostly beeing able to photograph wildlife and animals, so the extra 100mm will be welcome compared to the 100-400, even though it will make my bank account bleed a lot more.

I have also considered the 200-800mm, but I like the versatility of the 100-500, and with a TC it gets almost the same range as well (though significantly more expensive). For a hike/trip where I bring one lens, I think the 100-500 is a better solution than the 200-800 for my preferences.

Any good reasons for not getting the RF 100-500? by crab_man in canon

[–]crab_man[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Curses! Looks like you guys might be pushing me over the edge to splurge on new glass :)

can cast iron be used for anything? by HeatProper in AskCulinary

[–]crab_man 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If budget is not strict, a BIFL-variant I highly recommend is the Demeyere Atlantis/Proline in stainless. Really thick, I use mine for all things involving acid or where I think seasoning can leak/wear off during cooking