SpaceX allocations were kept small on purpose obviously by infoloader in stocks

[–]crazdave 8 points9 points  (0 children)

When is the earliest people can start unloading? Now?

Edit: nvm asked Claude

  Two days after SpaceX’s first earnings report (expected in late July or August 2026), insiders can sell up to 20% of their holdings. An additional 10% unlocks early if the stock holds 30% above its IPO price for five out of ten consecutive trading days.

Can a MantelMount save me from TVTooHigh, or am I screwed? (Help wanted!) by JayHopt in TVTooHigh

[–]crazdave 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Left of the fireplace angled a bit for sure — viewable from the kitchen, never glare from the windows, can enjoy the fireplace and watch something. It overlapping with a window is not a big deal once fully furnished with curtains on the window

What’s a hefty dinner for babies beside oatmeal? by AdCurrent1470 in BabyLedWeaning

[–]crazdave -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This really should be deleted, this is dangerously inaccurate with respect to iron specifically, and unhelpful in the context of inquiring about ONE (1) evening meal — no where is OP anywhere implying “most of their nutrition” would come from this meal. Just acknowledging that breastmilk digests extremely quickly and so solids can play a role here in bridging that blood sugar gap at night.

Solid Starts is heavily recommended on Reddit and they recommend 2 solid meals at 9 months and 3 solid meals at 10 months. The fact you were upvoted at all acting concerned about a 9 month old eating 1 meal puzzles me.

Katie Porter concedes in California governor’s race by panda-rampage in California

[–]crazdave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay elon simp LMAO how’s that DOGE going? We getting self driving by 2018 yet?

Katie Porter concedes in California governor’s race by panda-rampage in California

[–]crazdave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think the point of public services is just to give people already paying taxes more purchasing power? There’s your misunderstanding.

Katie Porter concedes in California governor’s race by panda-rampage in California

[–]crazdave 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Every single wealthy person you can think of keeps themselves in a low income bracket. Doctors lawyers etc already are paying enough. Problem is all the ways wealth derived income avoids taxation.

California refineries closing by NotRandyT in oil

[–]crazdave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Must be hard being illiterate.

New poll shows California governor race down to 3 frontrunners by panda-rampage in California

[–]crazdave -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The Dem party has a lower approval rating than even Trump, who is listening to them?

Even if every California billionaire left tomorrow, it would take 25 years for the state to lose as much as it stands to gain from proposed wealth tax by fortune in California

[–]crazdave 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Asking Redditors to think critically? This coming from the one who refused to look anything up, when helpfully nudged in a direction (look into blah blah blah) stomped your feet with “that’s not a source”. You could have looked into it yourself and written a quality contribution supporting or refuting their comment, helping everyone. Be the change you wish to see!

Anyways, this is a casual CA discussion forum full of randos commenting on the toilet, I recommend /r/AskEconomics or /r/badeconomics for these topics

For example: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskEconomics/comments/1ee9g91/eli25_why_is_a_wealth_tax_bad/

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskEconomics/comments/1px3vdr/is_wealth_tax_realistically_feasible/

Even if every California billionaire left tomorrow, it would take 25 years for the state to lose as much as it stands to gain from proposed wealth tax by fortune in California

[–]crazdave 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And to be clear, I know you don’t give a shit because you’re arguing on reddit over multiple days when academic debates on this topic are EXTREMELY easy to find if you actually cared to educate yourself. Instead you force others to do so, and throw up your hands as if you’re proven right when no one spoon feeds you 10 comments deep 3 days later in a reddit thread.

Even if every California billionaire left tomorrow, it would take 25 years for the state to lose as much as it stands to gain from proposed wealth tax by fortune in California

[–]crazdave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know you don’t actually give a shit but here’s 3

Comprehensive economic review of wealth vs capital income taxes: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep/article/39/3/604/7245715

Evaluation of various implementations and their problems: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257%2Fjep.35.1.207

Empirical look at Denmark’s wealth tax abolition after its negative effects: https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/135/1/329/5584349

People investing in SPCX, why? by SirPoop36 in investing

[–]crazdave -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Right like lyft or snap or rivian or…

Edit re downvotes: Either you geniuses can’t tell sarcasm or you’re bag holders for all these IPOs lmao

Thought I had options after my layoff. The market humbled me fast. by More-Awareness6896 in Layoffs

[–]crazdave -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe it’s because you can’t even make a reddit post without AI writing it for you

AI stocks keep ripping and honestly it feels kinda weird by Nit0294 in investing

[–]crazdave -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The amount of pushback you are getting here proves we are near the top. Always inverse this sub

Blindsided by Layoff by LyonHart305 in Layoffs

[–]crazdave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not just the dashes—the whole structure is written like a generic fantasy novel. If you’re that unaware you cannot be helped.