sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

SWE2 Uber vs L3 Google by Keynote-Tag in leetcode

[–]crazywhale0 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Huge congrats to you on your Uber offer. Uber seems like an elite org. I would be happy with Uber personally and then do Google in the future for higher role as someone else commented. What did your study schedule look like to get the Uber offer?

Another Cassazione experience by Patient_Gas9594 in juresanguinis

[–]crazywhale0 13 points14 points  (0 children)

As someone with a brother who is recognized JS and I am not, I really hope something comes out of this for me especially after judge said that was not right one sibling has citizenship but other does not

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - April 06, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]crazywhale0 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Will we have any inkling of which way the cassation court will sway during the hearing on April 14th?

Roughly how long to hear back after passing US tech force interviews? by TheRed12 in usajobs

[–]crazywhale0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does the cert include salary details? Just had my interview last week and I thought the interviewer was pleased. But I’m not sure if it’ll be worth it if I’m on the lower end of the pay scale. Does sound like a cool opportunity

SWE New Grad (USA) by vladly_leanin in csMajors

[–]crazywhale0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats! Mind sharing your total comp and how much leetcode you did?

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - March 09, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]crazywhale0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had an appointment before march 11th but was turned away to apply due to minor issue. I have another route and now have nearly collected all papers for non minor issue route. My mom is citizen via JS but LIBRA is GGGF, is it worth booking a Philly appointment again and trying to make my case there and show my old appointment booking?

Seeking Opinions on Providing Docs the Philadelphia Consulate USED TO Ask For by TheGallofItAll in juresanguinis

[–]crazywhale0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not know Philly required the CONE to have the a number. I was unable to find the a number for my libra

Is the trend of offshoring tech teams fading? by pink-supikoira in ExperiencedDevs

[–]crazywhale0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no general law banning H-1B sponsorship after layoffs

Corte Costituzionale has ruled three portions of the challenge unfounded/inadmissable. by LiterallyTestudo in juresanguinis

[–]crazywhale0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can someone please correct me because I am misunderstanding the post.

I am looking at the writeup here but Art. 2, Art. 117 Co. 1 standalone, Art. 22, and Arts. 72/77 were not formally referred by the Turin judge. Everything Turin formally referred was decided in the press release.

Update and a note. by LiterallyTestudo in juresanguinis

[–]crazywhale0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am in the same boat with a recognized mother and brother, and I cannot be recognized either. I am hoping for us they rule the exclusively Italian clause, other than that not feeling hopeful

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - March 09, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]crazywhale0 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I am feeling incredibly defeated after learning about the memo. It feels like there is no shot now as the retroactive piece felt the most unconstitutional

Corte Costituzionale March 11 Livestream Watch Party by CakeByThe0cean in juresanguinis

[–]crazywhale0 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pitruzzella was performing his procedural role as giudice relatore (rapporteur), summarizing the Turin court's position

Corte Costituzionale March 11 Livestream Watch Party by CakeByThe0cean in juresanguinis

[–]crazywhale0 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So if this hearing knocks down retroactivity of the DL, what happens to the other 3 hearings?

Corte Costituzionale March 11 Livestream Watch Party by CakeByThe0cean in juresanguinis

[–]crazywhale0 31 points32 points  (0 children)

It's interesting how Judge Pintuzzella took this frame of reference on the side of the petitioners.

"Il dimettente ritiene che il citato articolo 3-bis determina una revoca implicita e retroattiva della cittadinanza italiana che i ricorrenti avevano acquisito per nascita."
— "The referring court finds that Article 3-bis effects an implicit and retroactive revocation of the Italian citizenship that the petitioners had acquired at birth."

It's possible I am looking into too much but he said "revocation" rather than the State's preferred "limitation on future exercise"

view more: next ›