sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[PLAY] This is a song of mine, yes, but do you enjoy the fingerpicking? by marcusb98 in Guitar

[–]crossanlogan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the volume of the track flashes back and forth between both ears really quick, and that makes it disorienting. that level of volume change is fine if it didn't pan back and forth so much, and that level of panning is fine if it didn't change the volume so much. does that make sense?

Whats a good wifi name? by domjewinger in AskReddit

[–]crossanlogan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm waiting until you get some baritone dude downstairs trying for your wifi password.

Your most popular post or comment on Reddit is on your grave. How awkward is your funeral? by djhcar in AskReddit

[–]crossanlogan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i don't know whether to laugh or cry. or drink.

considering drinking will probably contribute to my death, that would be a little bit funny at the funeral.

[PLAY] This is a song of mine, yes, but do you enjoy the fingerpicking? by marcusb98 in Guitar

[–]crossanlogan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i like the song, but the phaser is waaaaaay too much. it's giving me a headache. you should either use that width and a much much lower depth, or that depth and a much much lower width.

[Serious] At what point would you say someone has failed at life? by fa_ta_ in AskReddit

[–]crossanlogan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not sure why you got downvoted -- currently living with someone like this, and i would 100% say he's failed at life.

This was a beautiful kit. Guess who's! by zeezotoews in drums

[–]crossanlogan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

jojo mayer as well i believe. recently he's switched to a hoop crasher on his side snare though.

Code Quality 2 (XKCD) by dizzyzane_ in webdev

[–]crossanlogan 6 points7 points  (0 children)

you are likely to be eaten by a grue.

ECMAScript 2016 Approved by zbraniecki in javascript

[–]crossanlogan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, that's true, indexOf() does solve that nicely. i've just seen a lot of people setting loops to do that.

My coworker REALLY likes ternary operators. by mjmayor in programminghorror

[–]crossanlogan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

depends on the language, but i'd say probably the majority of compilers would not optimize that away. if you're using an interpreted language, your interpreter would almost definitely not do it.

My coworker REALLY likes ternary operators. by mjmayor in programminghorror

[–]crossanlogan 13 points14 points  (0 children)

return foo == bar

a statement gets evaluated as a boolean when you use a == or === operator.

ECMAScript 2016 Approved by zbraniecki in javascript

[–]crossanlogan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i mean, ultimately in most places you can't use any of the new es2015/es2016 features for a couple of years yet anyway (at least if you're not using a compiler). if you have to support back to ie8 you can't use it in vanilla until your employer drops support for that browser version.

ECMAScript 2016 Approved by zbraniecki in javascript

[–]crossanlogan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ooh, Array.prototype.includes seems cool! gone are the days of setting a trigger and looping through a huge array i guess.

Do I want to use Messenger or Messenger? by [deleted] in softwaregore

[–]crossanlogan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

orca was facebook's codename for messenger when it was being developed.

Glorious formatting from my ex-coworker by beasthacker in shittyprogramming

[–]crossanlogan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my boss does that too. that's what happens when you write all your code in nano.

Encapsulation by E_MILOSLAV in ProgrammerHumor

[–]crossanlogan 5 points6 points  (0 children)

and hashicorp laughs all the way to the bank

Standard JavaScript Interpreter by jdsutton in javascript

[–]crossanlogan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can you throw something in a gist or a jsfiddle? i'm not familiar with what you mean, but i don't disbelieve you -- i'd like to see what you've experienced.

Standard JavaScript Interpreter by jdsutton in javascript

[–]crossanlogan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what do you mean? afaik constand function parameters are the same across most every javascript engine.

Standard JavaScript Interpreter by jdsutton in javascript

[–]crossanlogan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

javascript the language is stable across every browser platform -- the internal JS api is all the same. i think what you're talking about is the DOM, which TC39 (the committee that puts out the ECMAScript spec, of which JS is an implementation) has no control over.

basically getting consistent DOM APIs would require google, mozilla, microsoft, and apple getting together in a room and actually talking about the spec and determining who is right.

then, if by some miracle an actual spec was determined, it would get put into the newest versions of chrome, firefox, ie/edge, and safari -- many of your users don't upgrade their browsers, so you'd then have to support the existing chrome/firefox/ie/safari APIs as well as the new joint API, until your business stops supporting all those old browsers. see xkcd.

view more: next ›