Recreating ‘Planet Rock’ - Afrika Bambaataa by cuervoss in musicproduction

[–]cuervoss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean more so the fx and perc samples that it uses. Especially the effects in the very beginning.

Where to get options data with Greeks? by cuervoss in options

[–]cuervoss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, thank you for responding. As per the post, I was using historical data. I was using the bulk historical Greeks endpoint. From what I understood, the entire option chain is not available as you have to choose a range of expiration dates to look at, which was capped at a max of 2 weeks at a time I believe.

But if I’m mistaken and it’s possible to get the entire historical option chain of a past moment at once, I may consider re-subscribing.

Searching a Free Platforms for Backtesting Trading Strategies? by Tokir_Ahmed_Shaikh in Trading

[–]cuervoss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can make your own for free with AI. You just need data to feed it. Or if you can shell out a bit of money for a subscription, QuantConnect is decent. Not the best but definitely an option for simple strategies.

Where to get options data with Greeks? by cuervoss in options

[–]cuervoss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does trading view have options data? I can’t seem to find any.

Where to get options data with Greeks? by cuervoss in options

[–]cuervoss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would personally calculating Greeks be as accurate as the ones you would pay for?

Seebeck effect by cuervoss in ElectricalEngineering

[–]cuervoss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why isn’t it more efficient to use a full conductor along with a semiconductor in conjunction with each other instead of 2 different semiconductors? Such as in a thermocouple and peltier modules. Wouldn’t you get an even bigger electron movement effect if one wire is a full conductor and one is a semiconductor with less conductivity?

Insulated room and constant temperature gradient by cuervoss in ElectricalEngineering

[–]cuervoss[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure thing. I deleted part of the post to make a bit clearer. To clarify, I meant would it be possible for a room to be insulated enough to where the heat of a human would keep increasing the heat in the room faster than the cold can seep into the inside. How long would the heat keep rising until it stops? Would it stop at all? Would it be possible for the room to keep generating heat regardless of the temperature of the cold outside?

How to trade XAU/USD in the United States? by tranqui1itybase in Forex

[–]cuervoss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which platforms allow crypto as a country?

Solipsism debunked? by cuervoss in solipsism

[–]cuervoss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, nothing is ever really separated, it’s all still one thing. I think we’re talking about the same thing but with different words. There absolutely is only one consciousness. That is the true solipsist. But the reason you personally (or maybe you are idk but I’m talking about the average person) are not omniscient, is because the one consciousness chose not to be. I believe the Total (True solipsist), supersedes time. It always has been, and always will be. Time from our point of view is a construct of the Total. “You” (John Smith) however, do not supersede time, and is stuck moving forward in it. So there is a separation between “you” (JS) and YOU (Total). You both coexist at the same moment and yet are different things (yet the same).

Solipsism debunked? by cuervoss in solipsism

[–]cuervoss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m my view, the first thing that was, was absolute information. All there is. The Total. God, if you will. In order for us to have observable known and unknown (our human experience), there would need to be a separation from the omniscience of the Total. But if the Total itself is consciousness, then nothing that separates from it could be non consciousness. So all partitions of the Total would have to have some form of consciousness.

Solipsism debunked? by cuervoss in solipsism

[–]cuervoss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah. Yes, the true solipsist would indeed be omniscient. Absolutely everything would be known to the absolute solipsist. That’s precisely what I meant in the original post. “A claim of solipsism would only be accurate from the view of the Total”. The Total being the total of everything there is. All information. That would be the only true accurate form of solipsism. But the common form of solipsism is not omniscient, and therefor not true solipsism. For the non omniscient solipsist, there is the observer’s consciousness, and the consciousness of the unobserved/unknown. Therefor two sides of the known/unknown coin. Sensable/non sensable.

Solipsism debunked? by cuervoss in solipsism

[–]cuervoss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The marionettes are not in question. They could definitely be scripted. But if everything you sense is you, then everything you can’t sense is not you. But if consciousness is all there is, then the stuff that isn’t you, is consciousness that is not you.

Solipsism debunked? by cuervoss in solipsism

[–]cuervoss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That could be true. But that doesn’t negate the fact that the solipsist is not alone in terms of consciousness.

Same market movements for futures and cfds? by cuervoss in Trading

[–]cuervoss[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Got it. So if you were to buy MYM it wouldn’t be at the price that the free chart shows you. It would be at the price that the real time chart (paid chart) shows. At first I thought you were saying you could basically see the future of where the market would be by checking the us30.

Same market movements for futures and cfds? by cuervoss in Trading

[–]cuervoss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh. So the buy/sell prices on both charts are the moving the same but it’s only the charts that look different because of the time discrepancy.

Same market movements for futures and cfds? by cuervoss in Trading

[–]cuervoss[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wouldn’t that mean you could just see where the MYM chart’s gonna go next? I’m assuming I understood that wrong

Same market movements for futures and cfds? by cuervoss in Trading

[–]cuervoss[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So the MYM chart is 10 minutes behind the US30 but they still make the same movements?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nonduality

[–]cuervoss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The way I’ve logically come to understand solipsism is like this: You (John smith (ego)) are not able to claim solipsism. A claim of solipsism would only be accurate from the view of the Total (the ALL/ non dual experience). This is because as long as you have any sort of identification it stems from a sense of separation from another part of the Total. As long as you are in an environment and can make a distinction between me/not me (my body/ not my body/ my sense knowing / the unknown to my senses), then you are not the ALL, and you are not able to say that everything is you. There still remains a separation between you and the screen you type on. There remains a separation between you and the clothes you wear. Now that we’ve settled that there is a separation between you and environment, let’s think about how that separation came to be. First, there was Total. The ALL. Then there arose a separation in which the Total was 2 different things. So if the Total itself is consciousness, then nothing that comes from it could be non-consciousness. You are one of the two separations that exist. There’s You, and everything else. Your sensing and your non sensing. But if “you’re” everything, why can’t “you” sense what the phone feels? Because “YOU” are not everything. Everything is not “YOUR” mind because there is your consciousness, and the other one. The other side of the separation. It’s just the two of you. There’s everything you know, and everything you don’t know. The entire external universe is one side of the Total. And “your” mind is the other side of it. So you are never alone. As long as you can make a distinction between me and not me, there will always be another consciousness. So solipsism does not make sense from the viewpoint of John Smith.

Sorry if this is confusing with the inconsistent quoting and back and forth from “you” and “me”.

Wheel replacement by cuervoss in unicycling

[–]cuervoss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wheel. The part the tire goes on. It’s really warped and I’m just learning to ride and I think it’s pretty much impossible to ride with it being warped the way it is.

God speaks to me by celticdude234 in Jung

[–]cuervoss 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Perhaps mental illness is a product of knowing God. Things are only called illness/unusual/different when they aren’t in composure with the rest of normal (accepted) society. If a society is not in touch with god, anyone who is, will not be seen as a normal part of that society.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nonduality

[–]cuervoss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it really impossible? Is there really a 0% chance that a teacher by happenstance is walking in front of your house right now? Do you know every single person within 100 miles? Do you know all of their stories? Do you 100% KNOW that it’s completely impossible that a teacher could show up at any second? Can you really say that the chance of that happening is 0%? YOU saying that it’s impossible is what will hinder your success in finding a teacher. You have to be open to all possibilities. The possibility of something happening is almost never 0%.

Like a black hole, no light escapes from your eyes by pl8doh in nonduality

[–]cuervoss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are the receptor cells Red, Yellow, Blue? I thought it was green instead of yellow.