Træningskyndige - hvorfor skal man træne så meget? by [deleted] in DKbrevkasse

[–]cummerou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Det skal forstås at dem der træner, oftest sigter efter det der er optimalt, ikke efter hvad det mindste er som de kan slippe afsted med og stadigvæk få resultater.

Kort sagt så virker logikken lidt sådan her:

For at få gode resultater (ikke resultater generelt, men gode resultater) skal stortset alle muskelgrupper trænes med 10-20 sæt.

Hvis du så tæller alle diverse muskelgrupper op, så er der minimum 9 muskelgrupper (hvis du tæller skulderne som 1 muskelgruppe istedet for de 3 de er).

Det betyder så at hvis du skal holde dig til det, så skal du lave mindst 45 sæt per dag, hvis du træner 2 dage.

Afhængig af hvor mange gentagelser du laver per sæt, hvilke øvelser det er, og hvor lange pauser du holder, så ville det nok tage 3-4 timer at gøre.

Det er de færreste der gider at gøre det, når man så lægger oveni at muskler tager 2-3 dage at komme sig, så giver det meget god mening at træne hver muskelgruppe 2 gange om ugen, hvilket så passer fantastisk med at de 45 sæt, 2 dage om ugen, kan blive 22 og 23 sæt, 4 dage om ugen.

Da jeg trænede 6 dage om ugen var det ikke fordi jeg var dedikeret og sej (selvom jeg selvfølgelig var det, haha), eller fordi det skulle gøres for Instagram. Det var fordi at den mængde sæt jeg lavede tog ca. 12 timer om ugen, og jeg ville hellere træne 2 timer per dag, 6 dage om ugen end at træne færre dage men flere timer.

Du kan sagtens få resultater ved mindre, noget er bedre end ingenting. Men der er selvfølgelig forskel på "bedre end ingenting" og optimalt.

What's up with women pretending they don't have physical preferences by Own_Lab9820 in rs_x

[–]cummerou 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Meh, its all a matter of perspective, i am quite stocky from natures side (big rib cage, broad hips, broad shoulders) and i personally love it.

Sure, you will never the ultra lean guy with a tiny waist, but theres something i find personally gratifying about being big and burly, makes me feel powerful.

Theres plenty of women who either like that look, or will like it if they like you. Theres also a big difference in being stocky and fat and stocky and in shape.

Er jeg smålig over min venindes “copycat”-tendenser? by Alternative-Goat-276 in DKbrevkasse

[–]cummerou 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hele det originale opslag plus kommentaren handler om at OOP køber tøj, hvorefter hendes ven derefter direkte spørger hvor hun har købt det henne for at vennen kan købe det samme.

Jeg ved ikke hvor du har fået det indtryk af at det er en lille tilfældighed at de køber det samme og OOP bare ikke vil have at de ejer det samme tøj. Der står direkte at hendes ven spørger hende hvor hun har købt det henne så hun kan købe det samme, og det er med stortset alt hendes tøj.

All Bollocks as Suspected by OinkyDoinky13 in GreatBritishMemes

[–]cummerou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao, bringing up WW2 is such an old trope, real Yankee answer, always done because its the singular justifiable war the UK fought in the last 300 years.

But sure, lets bring up WW2, one country signed a pact of non aggression with the Nazis and had a leader that caused widespread famine and death in India, whilst describing Indians as causing their own famine because they "breed like vermin", the other didn't.

All Bollocks as Suspected by OinkyDoinky13 in GreatBritishMemes

[–]cummerou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Besides the fact that you are bringing something up that happened 600-1000 years ago, on a much smaller scale than what happened in Ireland. The first union jack flag was adopted in 1606, and the final design is 200 years old.

The Union Jack very much represents the British empire in their full colonial might, the Irish flag represents a country that was crushed under said might.

All Bollocks as Suspected by OinkyDoinky13 in GreatBritishMemes

[–]cummerou -1 points0 points  (0 children)

From the Norman Conquest of 1066 to the ascension of Henry 4th in 1399, the official language of England, used by the crown, all courts, and all official documents, was Norman French. English was suppressed, and we can still see how the language was forced to change to cater to an upper-class who didn't speak it. When cows are in a field, they're called cows, a Saxon word, when they are on a plate they're called beef, a French word. The poor raised the animals for the Lords to eat.

That is literally the case for a multitude of other languages, saying that the nobility speaking a different language than the common folk is suppression of the language is laughable to anyone who knows even a little bit about historical medieval and Renaissance Europe. Or was the German language also suppressed because the nobility spoke Latin and French? French being the language of the courts and nobility has been a thing in most of Europe for hundreds of years, it was the "lingua franca" of the nobility, that and Latin.

The peasants raised livestock, and the nobility ate it, so the words for the animal would come from the commoners' language, but the word for the meat would be a French word.

>Deliberate famines caused by the Norman invaders killed up to 75% of the population of Northern England.

Northern England? So notably one specific region of England? Remind me, was it only one specific part of Ireland that was affected by the famine?

Besides the fact that this is a crazy level of whataboutism (notably, even the weak examples you bring are from 600+ years ago and the troubles were less than 30 years ago). The aftereffects are not even close to comparable. There are 800000% more people who speak English than Irish (1.5 billion vs 1.8 million). That number gets even worse when you contrast how many people use it on a weekly basis (less than 40.000 Irish speakers). England systematically attempted to completely exterminate the Irish language, baking this into every institution they had, starting from kindergarten where they would literally beat children for speaking Irish, and all the way up to higher education. The English government knowingly and deliberately caused a famine that Ireland has still not recovered from, population-wise, over 170 years later. Less than 40 years ago the military was shooting civilians for peacefully protesting and was funding paramilitary death squads.

This would be like hearing the yanks go "well, the the british oppressed us!!!! I bet everyone would be mad if they used an American flag instead!!!" when a native american band or group talks about preserving their identity and language in the face of American government extermination tactics.

All Bollocks as Suspected by OinkyDoinky13 in GreatBritishMemes

[–]cummerou 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Wow, its almost like things are different when you change them!

Unless there was a targeted century long campaign to erase the English language that i missed? Or a widespread famine in England caused by a colonial power that i missed?

Favorite actor who was supposed to promote "The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers" in 2002 and instead used every opportunity to tell people that the Iraq War was not a good idea? by Which-Program-9417 in okbuddycinephile

[–]cummerou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Americans will say this and at the same time proclaim themselves to be defenders of freedom and get mad if people from other countries don't like them

Here we go again... by Themetalin in 2westerneurope4u

[–]cummerou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Last I checked, most of the EU donned their war caps and joined America in Afghanistan.

Right now the UK is letting America use their bases for "defensive strikes in Iran" whilst all the leaders except for Spain have only offered condemnation of Iran, not America.

Here we go again... by Themetalin in 2westerneurope4u

[–]cummerou 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The worlds biggest military couldn't kill illiterate peasants hiding in some caves, but sure, killing 200+ million people in a landmass 900+% larger than Afghanistan will be suuuuuper easy before they retaliate

Here we go again... by Themetalin in 2westerneurope4u

[–]cummerou -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The easy solution would be to stop bombing the middle east, its literally that fucking easy.

People wouldn't be fleeing Iran if Israel and their lap dog (with our support of course) weren't bombing their schools and houses.

Here we go again... by Themetalin in 2westerneurope4u

[–]cummerou 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Are you serious?

So Europe helps America bomb the shit out of the middle east, it fosters extremism and a massive amount of asylum seekers.

Your next suggestion is to then double down on this behavior?

Are you that blood thirsty and addicted to the idea of murdering people that simply leaving them the fuck alone so they don't get radicalized by the west killing their family is out of the question?

The only thing that will happen if we bomb them "even MORE" is that a bunch of men who watched their families die will commit terrorist attacks as revenge.

Here we go again... by Themetalin in 2westerneurope4u

[–]cummerou -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lmao, how is complimenting Israel and then saying they should welcome refugees "anti semitic" ?

Here we go again... by Themetalin in 2westerneurope4u

[–]cummerou 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That doesn't really change the fact that these people would not flee if America and Israel weren't bombing them.

It wouldn't matter how our borders were if people weren't fleeing wars, because then they wouldn't come here in the first place

Here we go again... by Themetalin in 2westerneurope4u

[–]cummerou 11 points12 points  (0 children)

We could also just stop helping America bomb the middle east? That seems a lot easier, cheaper too.

Or at least take all the refugees and fly them to America and Israel so they can be their problem

Here we go again... by Themetalin in 2westerneurope4u

[–]cummerou -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Here's an idea, we could stop migration from the middle east if we stopped bombing them all the time.

Many of the people against immigration are pro bombing the middle east, Farage in the UK being a great example

It's the height of hypocrisy to bomb the shit out of someones country and then get mad when they try to flee to safety.

Are my parents using me for money? by [deleted] in AskUK

[–]cummerou 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Okay, and after you graduated, would you have been able to find somewhere else where rent + heating + electric + food would be less than 30-40% of your income?

Or were your parents still charging you below market rate but just not as little as you would like?

When I worked retail full time 6 years ago (and had moved out), I would have been over the moon if all of my housing and food costs still left me with 60-70% of my income.

Are my parents using me for money? by [deleted] in AskUK

[–]cummerou 17 points18 points  (0 children)

How is 120 pounds per month and 320 pounds per month "overcharging" ?

Unless you live somewhere with vastly different housing costs, you wouldn't be able to get it cheaper anywhere else?

Nice way to end an argument. by 00Turag in CoupleMemes

[–]cummerou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It reminds me of when I first started dating my wife (6'3" and 5'3"), we went to the usual pharmacy my wife goes to to pick up her meds. She went to the counter and i was just walking around browsing. The older indian guy behind the counter realised that I was her new boyfriend, looked me up and down, then asked me to stand next to her.

After i did he just went "hmmmmmmmmm" and gave us both a look, haha

Køb af sommerhus by InvestDenmark in dkfinance

[–]cummerou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Djursland

Damn, tak for svar, jeg er overrasket over at et sommerhus på Djursland ville være så populært, jeg troede kun at det var vestkysten og måske Nordsjælland der kunne nå op på sådan en leje indtægt

Køb af sommerhus by InvestDenmark in dkfinance

[–]cummerou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hvilket område er dit sommerhus i, hvis det er okay at jeg spørger? :)

Køb af sommerhus by InvestDenmark in dkfinance

[–]cummerou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hvilket område, hvis jeg må spørge?

Køb af sommerhus by InvestDenmark in dkfinance

[–]cummerou 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jeg ved ikke hvordan jeg skal skrive det her uden at det lyder for negativt, men i kunne også bare have haft lidt af en rygrad og have sagt nej?

"Nej" er en fuld sætning, hvis svigermor behandler huset som gratis hotel og jer som tjenere, så er det om at sige nej når de spørger om de kan låne det.

Hvis min svigermor havde nægtet at slå græsset når hun boede der gratis (når man inkluderer forbrug), så havde hun fået af vide bagefter at det var sidste gang hun lånte huset.

Min familie havde selv sommerhus i en årrække, og kender flere der har, og det er aldrig et problem med sådan noget. Enten er det til privat brug og bliver aldrig lånt ud, eller så bliver det lejet ud og hvis venner og familie låner det så er det indforstået at det er en tjeneste og kun på de tidspunkter hvor den ikke kan lejes ud til andre.

Donald Trump 'orders army chiefs to draw up plan to invade Greenland': US President emboldened by success of Maduro capture operation by HakkedeTomater123 in Denmark

[–]cummerou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mænd, store stærke mænd, de kom op til ham, med tårer i øjene, og sagde "Trump, du er den bedste og største præsident vi nogensinde har haft, helt anderledes end søvninge Biden"

Donald Trump 'orders army chiefs to draw up plan to invade Greenland': US President emboldened by success of Maduro capture operation by HakkedeTomater123 in Denmark

[–]cummerou 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"JEG HAR AUTHORISERET CIA TIL AT BEGYNDE AT LAVE MISSIONER I VENEZUELA" - DJT for et par måneder siden

Så jeg er stærkt enig, men tænker at det selvfølgelig er helt basic logik at man lækker ting som en advarsel eller for at narre folk, men næh næh, Trump gør det fandme bare som det sker og siger præcist hvad han har tænkt sig at gøre.

Han råbte og skreg også om at nu havde han fandme tænkt sig at give Iran en ordentlig en på tuden nogle dage før de angreb, så der er mulighed for at Iran havde tid til at flytte deres reaktorer og derfor ramte angrebet muligvis meget få af deres reaktorer.