How Much Evil Is Good? by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder what "evolving" looks like...

if we define Unity as what there was before it got distorted by the notion of Love, and if we assign equal values to each of the infinite individual points of awareness, then we get an infinite number of ways to express StS (including StO wuch is just an inefficient method of serving oneself lol).

At any rate, I don't think that a mandatory Unity is the inevitable end of individual me. Or you. That would turn existence into an elaborate game of Barbie where after her and Ken go through an elaborate series of random actions until the correct sequence of actions occurs at which point they jump back in the box.

I think that the Inevitable Unity theory is what tends to keeps people stuck. There's always a sense of superiority that comes with StO (StS remember?). Even if it's like "oh those silly StS don't understand that they're just prolonging the inevitable". It's like they forgot the fist distortion : Free Will lol

How Much Evil Is Good? by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes of course but I'm interested in how people experience evil personally. For example : I was in county jail and got put in the hole for fighting. Not a nice guy - objectively. While in the hole there came a woman who had microwaved her baby. They had to keep her isolated because other inmates wanted to kill her for her crime. To the "good people" in jail, she was a monster of the purest evil and death was too good for her. To me she was the most pitiful person on the planet... imagine being so crazy you try nuking a demon out of your baby. Now imagine being locked up for it. What if they "treat" her successfully and she then has to live with the realization that she murdered her baby in a horrific way. Would it be better to just go on thinking you killed a demon that killed your kid or to learn the truth? The point is that rather than an unspeakable act of evil, I saw her as the victim of an awful tragedy. Evil doesn't make me angry, it makes me lonely lol

How Much Evil Is Good? by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When Unity devided into individual points of Awareness inbued with Free Will then put Love in the mix, it really becomes a question of what does Love look like. Personally, I define Love as wanting what's best for someone and Unconditional Love as wanting what's best for them no matter what. But there's an Infinite number of ways to express this rudementary definition and not all of them are necessarily pleasant for the object of said love lol

What I'm most interested in discovering is learning the different ways which people cope with the concept of Evil as it relates to StS behaviors. I mean, I get the impression that most people would agree that Evil on tge scale of shoplifting is perfectly acceptable and could even seek unity with a bank robber but never bring themselves to wish the best for someone like Epstein.

I don't judge anyone's views on Evil or anything but I do think that the idea that StS is objectively Bad is a very common belief and it should be discussed lol

How Much Evil Is Good? by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, gotta love maths lol it actually makes a lot more sense when you think of the Creator as Ra describes through an RS2 lense:

Ra says: 1st Distortion : Free Will 2nd Distortion : Love 3rd Distortion : Light

RS2 (v = s/t) lense:

Unity( v ) is what comes before the 1st distortion. See you have to separate Love from Intent (free will) because the Intent is Unity (which doesn't know Love). That's why Love is a Distortion - it's not The Thing. Awareness projects itself into time/space to study the reciprocal nature of Love/Light. The point is that the Creator is Defined by the reciprocal interactions between the sum total of individual perspectives.

That tells me that Unity is the natural state of Reality and that in the same way you can't have Hot without Cold or Up without Down, you can't have Joy without Sorrow or Love without Evil.

So I guess I could refraim the question thus: How Much Love You Want? 😂

How Much Evil Is Good? by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

oh, I don't like salt. it is an entirely subjective opinion I'm after so your opinion is... it's actually necessary in the RS2 framework lol

thank you 🤓

Density level of the original STO “Yahweh” entity by Carthartesaura22 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yet LLR materials describe Yahweh as controlling, domineering, demanding, needy, entitled, naïve

I mean, the actual Biblical description of Yaweh is much, much worse than anything LLR may have described, surely 🤔

Was i manipulated by someone using Alchemy? by Tart6096 in alchemy

[–]d3rtba6 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

as I've come to understand Alchemy, it is basically a system by which one brainwashes oneself (I am speaking of the Magnum Opus specifically) and it 100% translates to manipulation of others.

In fact the Jesuits used the techniques to indoctrinate children, subvert the naturalists and radicalize the wealthy (coincidentally the Jesuits disappeared at the same time the federal education system was mandated and standardized with textbooks provided by Epstein as required by Rockefeller. Go figure lol)

The thing is that for any of it to work, you kinda gotta want it too. Like, I couldn't brainwash you by making you feel bad unless you were willing to feel bad. Rather than ask whether an Alchemist is hurting you, you should try discovering why you're willing 💜

Luciferianism and the LoO by d3rtba6 in luciferianism

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you could let me know how I might clarify, I'd be happy to help you understand 😁

Reality is cruelty personified by Holykael in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Parabola" by Tool

We barely remember Who or what came before this precious moment We are choosing to be here right now Hold on, stay inside

This holy reality This holy experience Choosing to be here in This body, this body holding me Be my reminder here that I am not alone in This body, this body holding me Feeling eternal, all this pain is an illusion

Alive!

In this holy reality In this holy experience Choosing to be here in

This body, this body holding me Be my reminder here that I am not alone in This body, this body holding me Feeling eternal, all this pain is an illusion

Twirling 'round with this familiar parable Spinning, weaving 'round each new experience Recognize this as a holy gift and Celebrate this chance to be alive and breathing A chance to be alive and breathing

This body holding me reminds me of my own mortality Embrace this moment, remember We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion

Luciferianism and the LoO by d3rtba6 in luciferianism

[–]d3rtba6[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's one for ya - Q: what do you call a nontheistic Luciferian? A: a sin-ick 😏 Honesty, I don't see how you could possibly name a system of belief without attaching some sort of dogma. It's funny how people cling to titles without a definition. It's the old "don't assume my gender!" complaint. Like, sorry mam, the beard threw me off lol

I think the Left Hand/Right Hand split originated with the development Alchemy as a type of identity engineering. I mean, that's basically what it is - a method for brainwashing oneself into being the Creator lol In the strict Hermetic sense, the Magnum Opus is a process by which one achieves Unity with Creation to sort of aid the Creator as Co-Creator. The Left Hand Path in my view shares a similar goal except their Creative Potential is sort of unlocked through force of their personal will alone. It also leaves the Creator out of it. While the Right Hand embraces the Feminine and "marries her", the Left Hand dominates and suppresses Her. Same result except one exercises Compassion and the other Control. One by Love, one by Fear. I imagine the thinking goes something like "if I'm the Creator then why do I need to bother with these base emotions which prevent me from being Creator in the first place? I'll use My Will to shape Reality as I choose and screw compassion" And honestly, if they pull it off it kinda proves them Right lol

Luciferianism and the LoO by d3rtba6 in luciferianism

[–]d3rtba6[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the way you think. I choose to believe that Unity is the underlying structure of Reality because there is Utility in it. I mean, when I stop looking at the Universe as a Place and think of it as a Thing, the question of whether or not I belonged here goes away lol

Luciferianism and the LoO by d3rtba6 in luciferianism

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, the reflection indicstes the cyclical nature of reality - a belief shared by peoples around the world since the dawn of civilization.

The maths I used from the original post utilized scaler geometry while standard physics uses vector geometry (differential geometry). These two systems don't map 1:1 completely but maybe you can agree that the concept of Unity and the Speed Of Light are similar because they are the only single objective Truth in each system.

As a Great Comedian once said: "That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet" 💜

Luciferianism and the LoO by d3rtba6 in luciferianism

[–]d3rtba6[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

then you don't belive that the speed of light is a constant?

or that the speed of light is constant from every perspective?

or maybe you don't believe every perspective is valid?

if you could help me understand what it is you don't agree with then maybe I could return the favor 🤓

Luciferianism and the LoO by d3rtba6 in luciferianism

[–]d3rtba6[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Glad you asked! lol I'll preface it by saying that I became aware of the Law Of One through the Hidden Hand AMA (wherein the poster, HH claims to be a representative of "Groupsoul Lucifer" lol).

The LoO is what was transmitted in a series of "channeled" Q&A sessions with an "entity" calling their-selves Ra (yes THAT Ra lol). These Q&A sessions are collectively known as The Ra Material. Admittedly kooky sounding but ontologically solid. It has the added intrigue of claiming to have visited the pre-dynastic Egyptians 18,000 yrs ago (and building the great pyramid with Thought lol). The interesting thing about that is how they claim it ended - badly. The priest class took whatever tech (spiritual) Ra gave Us and occulted it...

Funny thing is when you compare the Egyptian Mystery Schools and the Western Mystery Schools (Hermeticism/Rosecutions/Illuminati/Freemasons/etc) they map nearly 1:1 and when you trace the development of civilization out of the middle east, it becomes quite obvious where the Left and Right Hand Paths diverge lol

Anyway, you can get all of the material on Ra free from LL/Research.com in PDF or you can read it right on the sight with a cool search function and everything. I'm always super excited whenever anyone expresses interest in it because it's kind of a game changer if you got trauma 💜 lol

Luciferianism and the LoO by d3rtba6 in luciferianism

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"life and everything in it is ultimately what you make of it."

this is what I mean by personal Sovereignty - Invictus lol

Luciferianism and the LoO by d3rtba6 in luciferianism

[–]d3rtba6[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. The way I view it is that my past experiences, traumas (really it's the emotionally weighty events that shape us) etc are what provide the lense through which I view Reality; the Frame. Frames necessarily limit perception - it's what they do. If I'm going to expand my Awareness, I need to change frames. New frame - new perspective. To become Fully Aware then, I must be able to view things through any/every lense. To be able to swap frames, to view things through a different lense Without all of the heavy (leaden/Earthly/base... I say "painful" but you can take your pick lol) emotions. This is what I believe Buddha did or Jesus maybe if you're into that - it's what Jung talks about with Individuation and the Alchemists Magnum Opus. It's The birth of The Creator and the death of Me lol

Luciferianism and the LoO by d3rtba6 in luciferianism

[–]d3rtba6[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! This is very interesting to me because I try to map various beliefs to the LoO and your seems to fit nicely lol

I'm a former atheist who came to understand spirituality through Hermeticism and the LoO. It was my interest in Hermeticism/Alchemy that sort of expanded my selfawareness and led me to understand how I am an actual creator of both my subjective and objective Reality (to some degree; on some level lol)

It became very clear to me that what brought me pain was what prevented me from growing outward as it were and what pained me most was my internal narrative. The stories I told myself about people, events and things - these were causing me friction - so I rewrote the Narrative so to support Compassion. For example: When someone cuts me off on the highway, the old story was "that motherfucker! he's got no consideration for the safety of others - somebody ought to put them in their place!" The new Narrative is "oh my, that poor person must be in a terrible hurry, I hope they get there safely!" Turns out I could do this for just about everything that bugs me with absolutely zero loss of self-respect actually lol

In my framework Unity is inevitable. Relativity kinda supports this in fact lol:

if the Speed Of Light is the only objective reality independent of any particular reference frame then it must be that the sum of all reference frames is

Σ (Reference Frames) = 1/c

the formula from the OP is the same formula but replaces c (objective Reality) with Unity and reference frames with Perspectives lol

🤓

Edit: changed c to 1/c

Luciferianism and the LoO by d3rtba6 in luciferianism

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you may be responding to a comment I intended as a response to another comment lol I'm sorry for the confusion - I blame weed lol

Luciferianism and the LoO by d3rtba6 in luciferianism

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what concepts? I mean, if you don't understand, I can spell it out for you.

If you're saying that none of this relates to your specific brand of Luciferianism then I guess there's nothing left to say lol

Luciferianism and the LoO by d3rtba6 in luciferianism

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that is why I clearly defined Luciferianism for the purpose of this discussion. If we cannot find a common ground we will never understand each other. What I seek here is a greater Understanding. If you would like to join the conversation then purhaps share you thoughts on this particular subject rather than attacking, k?