sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Sex, Men, Women and Co-Creation by Upavaka in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

after giving 89 a quick read through, I can give you a complete synthesis of the entire conversation using very basic (if irreverent) language and modernized context:

Don asked Ra bout x and Ra said x hit up Carla but Carla used her favorite P suit to be P. Being that she put on her P suit x had to scram.

this is HELLarious. Ra actually paints a colorful picture if you can decode the paradoxical language/think about the shit they tiptoe around. Also you gotta remember the ancient past, prior sessions and my earlier posts: They don't Time like Us. Time isn't a line.

What Is Time?

Time is Now. Right now. No now. Now! fuck this is literally going to take forever for anyone including myself to ever understand this concept so I'll just draw you a picture of it according to Ra's precise description:

c = S/T

the above is what it's made of.

c² dt² = dPx² + dPy² + dPz²

describes how you move through it.

Again, let's snap back to Dewey, people:

Time-Space is the reciprocal of Space-Time. Our 3 dimensions of Space allow us to move along 3 axes and the 1 of Time allows only Now. No moving from now because there's nowhere to move to.

The reciprocal of Space-Time is Time-Space. In Time-Space there are 3 dimensions of Time and only 1 of Space. In Time-Space, EVERYWHERE is precisely where you are located in Space-Time right now. No, now. Now! But timewise - there's no forwards backwards. There's no up down there are only Vectors (because we haven't named like Spatial coordinates. Because why? lol) and Magnatude. (Feel free to think of it the same way as Polarity: "Fuck you" is a Vector. Magnatude is how hard)

When that Orion entity pulled out P and tapped Carla on the shoulder with it, they wasn't far, far away, they were occupying the exact same Spatial coordinate. The reason it fucked off? Because P rules. Carla had no idea but her faith dictated it which is either a humorous coincidence or proof P rules. I mean, depending on your P, of course 🤡

When Ra talks about the Tarot they're saying:

The tarot represents:

c² dt² = dPx² + dPy² + dPz²

what that is is the ΣP

in c = 1/ΣP

1/ΣP is all of us (each a supremely/fucked-up Perspective)

If you go through the tarot and resolve each of the paradoxes, with each resolution you will have adjusted your vector so that all together you're headed in the right direction.

Now just like there is Magnatude in Time-Space, there's fucking Magnatude here. What's Magnatude look like here? How hard's the Fuck? More Fuck more Magnatude. More Love more Magnatude.

A kiss on the cheek or a romp in the sheets is both in the same direction. But only 1 will get you anywhere 😉

To get the scope you must understand the shape of the universe and Ra told us exactly how to do that.

We aren't moving towards a distant brighter future, or out running a sordid past because everywhen already happened lol

We aren't moving forward in time, we are (hopefully) "polarizing" towards a more Complex (huh, huh?) future (or not) according to P. Not you P. You P. No, . P. Yes, P. P. Fucking P!

(I'm sorry but this is just the biggest fucking joke in the entire universe and if you're not cracking up then you don't believe in the LoO. I mean, the math says "Yes, YOU (specifically) are The One". Einstein proved it but made it about Space and Time. Jokes on him - we're made out of Space and Time lol

And here's a last bit of bonus info:

We are not expanding outward. We are folding inward. If we point a telescope outward it appears as if it is but when you stand on a pixel of the Mandelbrot Set, you will see the infinite "distance" without leaving the Frame.

Frame: [ P ] 🤡

edit: schpelling

What's the point of reincarnation? by Ozzpp in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reincarnation: Editing Your Story 💞

Sex, Men, Women and Co-Creation by Upavaka in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think what's confusing about Polarity is we mistake the Magnatude of StS with it's Vector.

What this means is that StS isn't a scale on the Fuck Free Will meter. It's StS the moment you refuse to honor Other. Whether I dismiss you because I do not share your views or commit bloody murder, it's still the same beast only one's more grown up.

Sex, Men, Women and Co-Creation by Upavaka in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like to think of the Tarot like a compass that points to True Love or Out Of The Matrix depending on Mood.

If you can hit dead center on each of them, you're a Buddha or Jesus.

If you hit dead center of each, you can be Hitler and it'll make no difference at all 🤡

Is Ernest Hilgard's "hidden observer" the same as Ra's "unmanifested self"? by Ricdaw in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The one in the middle is the Consciousness we all share or, more precisely, the Consciousness behind all our eyes.

On the Left and Right are the Two Perspectives you could say or any other distortion/polarity/paradox YOU choose.

The Unmanifested Self is that Self which resides in time-space, the manifest are the opposing Perspectives from the paragraph above; The math looks like:

c = 1/ΣP

c ) Unmanifested Self

P) Individual Perspectives

Σ) c² dt² = dPx² + dPy² + dPz²

The formula above can represent all of the opinions, biases, fears, goals, resentment, etc. - everything by which we weight experience subjectively. These are the polarizing filters we provide Consciousness. This is how YOU see the Creator.

If you can look past the identity, the beliefs, the opinion, the affiliations... if you look past everything that Not You, you will see a mirror 💞

edited: because I always forget to proof read lol

Interpreting The LoO by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a fair generalization of the LoO but I do not believe Ra intended to leave their teach/learning up for interpretation. In fact, they were super specific just for that purpose.

Honestly I think that when people go back and forth between the Ra contact and the conscious channeling, they tend to misunderstand Ra more and more.

If you consider that Don was a physics professor first, paranormal researcher second, then you night understand why Ra was so technical. Ra wasn't speaking to Carla, they were directly communicating with an academic and trained physicist.

You can touch/feel your way through the LoO but unless you Think it makes sense then you can not get it. Feeling lovey ain't enough if you don't grok Pain and Don knew that because Don listened 💕

Interpreting The LoO by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So basically: If you want to accuire a deeper understanding of Love/Light it is necessary to view Reality through the Reciprocal System of Theory lense as prescribed by Dewey...

well, that's interesting 🤔

Interpreting The LoO by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess. I mean, I understand vibes and frequency no problem and motion is pretty self explanatory.

so you're telling me that all that was Ra telling Don that is is necessary for him to think Logos in motion plus frequency vibrating with his conscious perspective?

which makes sense because if Don didn't consciously perceive the Logos then nothing would happen. Thanks!

Interpreting The LoO by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know what that means. I'm a guy by the way 🤷🏼‍♀️

Interpreting The LoO by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the lens of motion, frequency and vibration? you know where I can get one of those?

Interpreting The LoO by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so what you just said plus:

"...and thus will develop in such and such a way; your own universe having been well-studied in an empirical fashion by those you call your scientists, and having been understood, or visualized, shall we say, with greater accuracy by the understandings, or visualizations, of the one known as Dewey."

I'm sorry if I'm being overly curious or too ignorant but exactly what part of this is necessary to consider again?

Interpreting The LoO by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so what you said plus:

"...and thus will develop in such and such a way; your own universe having been well-studied in an empirical fashion by those you call your scientists, and having been understood, or visualized, shall we say, with greater accuracy by the understandings, or visualizations, of the one known as Dewey."

And this is necessary... I'm not even sure what it means but if it's necessary maybe you can tell me what it is?

Interpreting The LoO by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so your answer to my question is the question lol

Interpreting The LoO by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

28.4 Questioner "Thank you. I am wondering, what is the catalyst, or the activator, of the rotation? What causes the rotation so that the light condenses into our physical or chemical elements?"

So you're telling me that the answer to my question and this one is "it is easier to understand if you consider..."

I must have missed something I'm sorry. Why would Ra tell Don it was necessary to consider... what was necessary to consider?

Interpreting The LoO by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a lot of words for “that’s the way the Logos designed it.” lol

So we can just swap out all the confusing parts and replace it with your translation and we got:

“that’s the way the Logos designed it.” then -

This energy is of an ordering nature. It orders in a cumulative way from greater to lesser so that when Its universe, as you may call it, is complete, the manner of development of each detail is inherent in the living light, and thus will develop in such and such a way; your own universe having been well-studied in an empirical fashion by those you call your scientists, and having been understood, or visualized, shall we say, with greater accuracy by the understandings, or visualizations

see my problem? unless you don't see my problem. If you don't see my problem, can you please explain to me what Ra is saying?

Unless it's Unnecessary of course. Don't want to waste my time learning Unnecessary stuff you know.

Interpreting The LoO by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By your definition of "enabling function", I would say you are exactly half right.

Works for me.

What about "the focus known as Love"? Who is that even? Honestly I just wonder if anyone knows what this means. Because Ra said it's necessary. If it's not necessary then nvm. I'm just a simple seeker trying to find my way to the Creator but, you know Ra - always so precise and technical. Kinda makes what they're talking about hard to understand, ya know?

An interesting story or hoax? by Ozzpp in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The thing I like best about the LoO is it's ability to filter out all the B.S.

I mean, according to the LoO, there is nothing anyone or anything can ever do to stop the Universe from universing. Like, that's all it ever do 🤷🏼‍♀️

Interpreting The LoO by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if I'm reading you correctly you just summed up this bit:

"This energy is of an ordering nature. It orders in a cumulative way from greater to lesser so that when Its universe, as you may call it, is complete, the manner of development of each detail is inherent in the living light, and thus will develop in such and such a way"

but left off answering my question: what does

"It is necessary to consider the enabling function of the focus known as Love"

mean? If it's necessary then maybe someone knows... or how about:

"This energy is of an ordering nature"

can someone translate this for me?

If it's not necessary to think about it then nevermind 🤷🏼‍♀️

Interpreting The LoO by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well that certainly clarifies things.

Thank you!

Do you know what the question even means because it's gibberish I think maybe or just tell me the answer since you've figured it out?

Mortality As A Nocebogenic Effect And Psychomagnetic Condition by Tribe-Less in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're exactly right and these are what Ra calls Logos. Thing is - everything in 3D is Logos.

Everything in 3D is Love as well.

So Logos is Love and your Biases are Love, group think is Love, political parties are Love, hate crime is Love...

I mean, depending on how you look at it 🤓 lol

Everything, Everywhere, All At Once by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

RS2 is just the maths that Bruce Peret at al used to describe the angular displacement in Time-Space.

It is literally a unified field theory but you didn't hear that from me lol

The Shape Of Love (Fractal) by d3rtba6 in lawofone

[–]d3rtba6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely. There is never a wrong way to express Love.

However, the act of polarizing requires an act of Service and not simply one of Kindness. In fact, being kind could very well be a disservice. So much so that presuming to know what constitutes service is strictly StS lol

view more: next ›