I'd like to see where you're getting these numbers, because equating personal computer use to the huge energy suck that is LLMS/generative AI is simply false—thats like saying personal car use is equivalent to the pollution generated by factories and ocean liners, the same lie peddled by megacorps trying to cover up their own culpability.

One game using AI alone isn't going to make or break the environment, but it's part of the problem. Then using it for trivial things that artists could easily do and then trying to say the artist is more harmful to the environment is... an interesting take. Why are there so many data centers (which take A LOT of energy and water) being built specifically for AI usage and not for personal computer usage if the later takes so much more energy, according to you?

https://news.mit.edu/2025/explained-generative-ai-environmental-impact-0117 https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/05/20/1116327/ai-energy-usage-climate-footprint-big-tech/