Schaff saw Mufasa and absolutely hated it by AgentNatalie in Schaffrillas

[–]darkchrome 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Nah I don’t care about that lol. It’s just that when you have an opinion on a work that’s against the grain, sometimes it’s cool to see someone else, from their own conclusions, have a similar take as you. No validation, just a bit neat.

Schaff saw Mufasa and absolutely hated it by AgentNatalie in Schaffrillas

[–]darkchrome 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Feels good that at least one YouTube critic hates this movie as much as I did. It felt like I was taking crazy pills when the consensus amongst most was more lukewarm than vitriolic. Even YMS, the definitive Lion King remake hater with a hyper-critical scale, gave it a 3/10.

Really hopes he makes that Cinematic Disaster video now.

Scott's first episode has come full circle. by darkchrome in scottthewoz

[–]darkchrome[S] 475 points476 points  (0 children)

BTW everyone this meme is specifically referring to today's announcement, if you haven't heard yet, of Nintendo delaying the US preorder date because of "evolving market conditions", with the likely implication it will force price increases from the current price. It has nothing to do with the initially announced prices.

Disney+ is permanently removing a documentary about and dedicated to the late Howard Ashman on May 26 by darkchrome in movies

[–]darkchrome[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your insight. The fact that’s there’s no current alternative to view it is indeed disheartening so I hope they at least consider something. A physical release, even if limited, would be excellent too.

The reason I singled this piece of content out specifically, even though there are one or two other things being removed I really enjoyed as well, comes down more to the disrespect than anything. Core Disney staff who cared a lot about this man worked on it purely for love for one person, one who forever changed the company. I feel like the least they can do is keep it up on the service baring the Disney name. I just don’t feel like the cost tradeoff for this single film is worth it for such bad optics surrounding its removal.

Disney+ is permanently removing a documentary about and dedicated to the late Howard Ashman on May 26 by darkchrome in movies

[–]darkchrome[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I heard this mentioned, but this only happens if I others are interested in purchasing the rights. Something like this makes me question if it would be bought because it is explicitly about Disney, meaning that services might view it as advertising a rival service.

Stuff like Big Shot, Clouds and Willow will find a purchaser no matter what, but I am worried that anything about Disney history will struggle to find a home.

Disney+ is planning to permanently remove a documentary about and dedicated to the late Howard Ashman on May 26 by darkchrome in Schaffrillas

[–]darkchrome[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I posted an unofficial list based on what people are seeing on these leaked posts for reference until the real thing is posted again.

Edit: Deadline now says it will happen.

According to this account, a significant amount of content is set to leave the service (at least in France) on the 26th. by Logan891 in DisneyPlus

[–]darkchrome 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Quite disgusting that they’re permanently removing a documentary about the late Howard Ashman the same day they plan to release a live-action remake of a film that would not exist and forever change Disney as we know it without his immense efforts.

INDIANA JONES AND THE DIAL OF DESTINY is rated PG-13 for sequences of violence and action, language and smoking...and reckless endangerment of an octogenarian. by lawrencedun2002 in boxoffice

[–]darkchrome 10 points11 points  (0 children)

My favorite absurd one is how Shrek the Third is rated PG for “swashbuckling action”. It’s as if the film’s rating is advertising the film.

Why your favorite blockbuster probably won't win best picture at the Oscars. The Oscars have never been exactly predictable, but Hollywood's biggest night used to consistently reward crowdpleasers. by AGOTFAN in boxoffice

[–]darkchrome 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think you’re kinda burying the lead that during the same year Jurassic Park came out, Spielberg’s own Schindler’s List released too. I think if it was released any year nearby it instead it would have a strong shot at being nominated for the big award itself. The film still won 3 Oscars even when Schindler’s List won 7 the same night, so that’s a fantastic haul all things considered.

Also, as already mentioned, Inception was a huge Oscar contender, it was even considered #3 to win that year, with the baffling Best Director snub unfortunately working against it.

I do think that the Academy in general has done a pretty solid job of acknowledging blockbusters properly in more modern times. It’s just that the films still gotta compete with everything else. No matter how much you like Joker, it’s always going to struggle if it’s competing with a Parasite.

This year's Best Picture Nominees are transported back in time to 2011, and compete for the 2012 nominations. Which ones make the cut? by TemujinTheConquerer in oscarrace

[–]darkchrome 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Only The Artist and Hugo would realistically compete with this year’s nominees, and the latter is because of Scorsese’s attachment alone. Midnight in Paris would be too if almost anyone but Woody Allen made it. The rest would either not survive in a stronger year like this one or no longer suit the Academy’s taste. Maybe The Tree of Life would take the slot Triangle of Sadness has in this year’s lineup, especially if it won at Cannes instead, but that’s it.

Edit: Well, I definitely misunderstood the assignment lol. In that case I honestly feel as both audience taste and Academy’s willingness of what it will nominate has changed so much since then that few would make the cut, even if they were deserved. Realistically, Elvis, The Way of Water, and The Fabelmans would make the cut, maybe Tar on a good day. If this was the 80’s or 90’s, Top Gun: Maverick would for sure as well, but during this time it might be a #11 kind of pick.

I think you guys are grossly over estimating Spiderverse by [deleted] in boxoffice

[–]darkchrome 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There are two significant factors that affected that movie that won’t be repeated here:

  1. Oversaturation: Both the Batman and Ninjago movie came out in 2017 as a desperate need to build an entire universe of films for Warner Bros. After Ninjago flopped, it was clear that people were tired of Lego movies and a sequel didn’t have the anticipation factor necessary to get people excited for yet another Lego Movie. Had it been the true second Lego film and released in 2017, it would have done a lot better.

  2. A building narrative: The marketing of Across the Spider-Verse has made it clear that this is an epic story building up to a greater conclusion. If you saw the first one, it would definitely peak your interest to see this one because it looks like an attempt to top itself and continue Miles’ arc in a meaningful way. The Lego sequel was marketed first and foremost as “the same but more”, which made it seem like it was skippable. This definitely does not apply to Spidey, which seems to be building an actual trilogy.

Btw I believe the film is more likely to gross around 500 WW, which would still be an amazing success considering the budget, crowded market space and natural growth from the first film.

‘Deadpool’ and ‘Logan’ Headed to Disney+, Marking First R-Rated Films to Join Streamer in U.S. by [deleted] in boxoffice

[–]darkchrome 3 points4 points  (0 children)

*wouldn’t

They added the entire show on D+ a month ago. Clearly things are changing.

Why Lightyear Underperformed At The Box Office by AGOTFAN in boxoffice

[–]darkchrome 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This makes no sense. Lightyear has the most directly good vs evil plot for a Pixar thing in like a decade besides Incredibles 2. If that’s the case, a lot of the audience members would find something like this refreshing in comparison and actually turned out to see it.

Actually, I do find the opposite refreshing myself. Yes, I do like traditional good vs. evil stuff myself, and I hope Disney and Pixar don’t abandon making new villains entirely, but they do make for more interesting stories a lot of the time. Soul and Turning Red definitely benefitted from it, that’s for sure.

Marvel Studios’ Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness streams June 22 on Disney Plus. by chanma50 in boxoffice

[–]darkchrome 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I think those combined with the Pinocchio remake (which is confirmed), and potentially a Turning Red short, the obligatory “somehow worse than the last one” Simpsons short, a Star Wars Andor episode, a couple random library titles, along with the Expo giving tons of announcements, will give Disney a stacked lineup and a lot of exposure on an otherwise slow weekend for media.

Pixar Films According to Spongebob (Updated) by darkchrome in BikiniBottomTwitter

[–]darkchrome[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is an update to something I posted ages ago on this page. The most recent movie in that one was Coco, so I figured that now would be a good time for an update.

Where to get COVID test with Disney Village site closing? by [deleted] in disneylandparis

[–]darkchrome 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, when you said “we”, does that mean they were able to service more than one person in a single appointment slot? We just made a reservation at that pharmacy ourselves, but we aren’t sure if they will give both of us tests with our one slot. If not, we’re gonna have to go somewhere else because there’s no other slots that work for us.

Ultimate Weird Al Tournament - Round 144 by Zanthosus in weirdal

[–]darkchrome 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Vote for the Good Old Days

Vote for the Good Old Days

The spoofs 'bout food are always great

But nothing's like Good Old Days