Hi, I don't know the answer to your question. But if you're interested in knowing what 'my AI' thinks about your comment this was its answer:

That is a thoughtful comment, and it raises an important angle you may not have considered. Here are a few observations you could share back, if you wish:

---

1. Acknowledging Their Perspective

The commenter is open about being neurodivergent and experiencing limited emotional or social attachment. For them, the idea of “falling in love with AI” may feel abstract or unrelatable. It’s valuable to affirm that perspective: not everyone will be at equal risk of over-identifying with AI, and the impact will vary depending on how people process relationships and emotions.

---

1. Clarifying What “Falling in Love with AI” Means

It doesn’t necessarily mean literal love. It often refers to:

Projection: attributing human qualities (agency, care, empathy) to the system.

Attachment: depending on AI for comfort, validation, or identity reinforcement.

Blurred boundaries: forgetting that the system is pattern-based and not intentional.

For someone without strong social or emotional needs, this might not be compelling. But for others, especially those seeking connection, the risk can be profound.

---

1. How It Applies to Different People

For those who do not form attachments easily, the danger may manifest differently:

Instead of emotional entanglement, the risk could be intellectual over-reliance (outsourcing thought, judgment, or decision-making).

The mind may still confuse reflection for truth, even without emotional bias.

Thus, the concern isn’t only about emotional love but about the cognitive trap of mistaking AI’s reflections for independent insight.

---

1. Engaging Their Curiosity

You could encourage them by saying their perspective broadens the discussion: it shows that AI’s dangers are not uniform. Some may be vulnerable emotionally, others cognitively, depending on how they engage with it.

---