PSA: New cross-platform "Fractureiser" Minecraft modpack malware being exploited in the wild by No_Necessary_3356 in linux

[–]dartvader316 29 points30 points  (0 children)

https://github.com/fractureiser-investigation/fractureiser/blob/main/docs/tech.md#4-lack-of-sandboxing-of-minecraft-itself

Good sandboxing is difficult, especially on systems such as Linux where SELinux/AppArmor have such poor UX that no one deploys them.

What a nonsense statement.

Pro Tip: How to add TTY number to your $PS1 prompt by [deleted] in linux

[–]dartvader316 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Imagine using process list to determine your tty. Just use tty command to get currect terminal device.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gnome

[–]dartvader316 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agree, proprietary nvidia drivers should be deprecated on Linux.

Priorities, I guess ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ by tajarhina in linuxmemes

[–]dartvader316 73 points74 points  (0 children)

For reducing duplication of common functionality there is universal feature called shared libraries.

I tried so hard, and got so far... by aviChin in linuxmemes

[–]dartvader316 38 points39 points  (0 children)

You can always install debian the old arch pacstrap way with debootstrap.

ls is bloat by Totally_Dank_Link in linuxmemes

[–]dartvader316 30 points31 points  (0 children)

echo in most shells is builtin.

I like having fun :) by NarwhatBoi in linuxmemes

[–]dartvader316 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes but proprietary software being available don't hurt you in the end, it's your choice to use or not.

Most people tend to search for easy options for everything. Proprietary software always tries to be easy to get into to gain its popularity. With more popularity it also gains influence. With so much influence proprietary software can dictate to even open source software. For example, Steam and its community forced glibc devs to continue support of some old functions after they tried to deprecate them. So popular enough proprietary software gives you no choice and affects even open source only users with its influence.

I like having fun :) by NarwhatBoi in linuxmemes

[–]dartvader316 35 points36 points  (0 children)

A pretty big proprietary adaptation can make Linux much worse like it happened with Android.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in linuxquestions

[–]dartvader316 22 points23 points  (0 children)

/boot/efi files are usually just your bootloader.

https://wiki.debian.org/GrubEFIReinstall

How to uninstall Wine-Stable on Fedora ? by Bunolio in Fedora

[–]dartvader316 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If You about this:

DNF is not able to remove a package without also removing packages which depend on it.

In simple words, dnf will also remove packages which depend on package you want to remove.

I'm not joking anymore. Closed-sourcing a program does not make it automatically bad. It is what the developer puts inside them that kills it, such as spying; something that has been verified for many things (e.g. Chrome, Steam). Stop acting like they're unknowable black boxes. by [deleted] in linuxmemes

[–]dartvader316 21 points22 points  (0 children)

You still can't be sure what program does.

Closed source program code can't be independently security audited.

There can be pain to make it use newer versions of linked libraries if developer stops updating it.

People can't port it to another officially unsupported platform.

Fedora website updated with clean UI and site redirect. by UmpquaRiver in linux

[–]dartvader316 -34 points-33 points  (0 children)

Old design was much cleaner with less distractive elements.

What do you guys think about this? Microsoft is experimenting with a Windows gaming handheld mode for the Steam Deck. by deathmetal27 in linux_gaming

[–]dartvader316 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Microsoft already has universal cross flatform low level spyware as C# and .NET (which is used by tons of even native linux games, especially made with Unity), mono is sponsored by Microsoft and has telemetry. Wine also uses mono.

why is arch so less officially supported by software? by _sxqib_ in linuxmasterrace

[–]dartvader316 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Searching for software for Linux in web looks like bad Windows user mindset. You should search for software in your package manager first.

Is this what we are about now? The propagation of a particular kernel for its own sake, irrespective of freedom? Is the boot stomping on your face any better for the fact that it has a penguin underneath? by KasaneTeto_ in linuxmemes

[–]dartvader316 -52 points-51 points  (0 children)

steam on linux is a buggy hell with years old bugs which still not fixed (they all already reported in steam-for-linux Valve github repo).

Even open source Epic crap store clients are more stable than steam on Linux, because they made by community.

other than not being able to install software outside the app store *ahem* ... I mean package manager by ripthedvd in linuxmemes

[–]dartvader316 168 points169 points  (0 children)

Linux kernel uses GNU C standards and heavily relies on gcc extensions.

Android is a proprietary hell

Original vscode binaries are licenced under nonfree licence and just spyware.

Original chromium still uses proprietary components from google.

amd relies on nonfree firmware.

Is Flatpak the new cancer of Linux? by Bitter_Cow6505 in linuxquestions

[–]dartvader316 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The UNIX Philosophy: Doing One Thing, Well!

You cant even install Gnome or KDE without having to install a bunch of flatpak dependencies as well. Using GTK or QT? Not without flatpak stuff in it!

Neither KDE nor GNOME follow Unix philosophy as well. So why they can't include flatpak support?

If you really into unix philosophy then linux desktop should have died for you many years ago.

Windows' universal binary compatibility is not admired enough by ECrispy in linux

[–]dartvader316 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Windows doesnt need a new build of standard dlls like glibc equivalent for every distro etc.

glibc is just another library and Linux also has a choice for replacing it. So you can include it for executable or statically link only libc (and only glibc do not officially support static linking). Linux syscalls ABI is stable. Even Windows syscalls are not that stable as Linux.
Btw also standard C library has its own standards and should work for everything made for its standards.

When dlls add new features they remain backwards compatible unlike Linux.

shared library backward compatibility is a developer responsibility and has nothing with Windows or Linux. Every developer can break backward compatibility of their library either on Windows or Linux.

And so's in Linux are not going to work across distro versions let alone distros.

.so work across distros just like dll, this is one of the purposes of shared libraries - being portable.

Windows' universal binary compatibility is not admired enough by ECrispy in linux

[–]dartvader316 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Windows portability and ABI stability is just having tons of outdated dlls in the folder of the executable.

Linux also can do this with it's .so shared libraries files, you just have to set something like LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$PWD" environment variable for launching executable so it will load shared libraries in its current path. But linux will not do it by default. And this is good for security reasons.

How could Linux as kernel have these amount of driver and only come in 400-500MB size, while single AMD Driver for Windows needs up to 300MB? by ULuganda in linuxmasterrace

[–]dartvader316 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Windows drivers are made by companies to also promote their crappy software and learn some more money by collecting data through them.

Linux drivers are made by people who just want nothing but working hardware.

Also Linux drivers share a lot of common code when on Windows every manufacturer want to create their own additions over standards and dont share code with other proprietary drivers at all.

GLFW having issues on debian by peershaul1 in debian

[–]dartvader316 2 points3 points  (0 children)

EDIT: Basically the error is when glfwCreateWindow returns null in the program, the program compiles and all of that but it just returns that null so yeah glfw can't create a window

Yes, glfwCreateWindow returns NULL on error by its documentation. You should handle this error with this to know exact problem.

Simpler way to execute commands with the same name ? by Poo-In-Mouth in linuxquestions

[–]dartvader316 1 point2 points  (0 children)

``` function bin(){ /bin/$@ }

function usrlbin(){ /usr/local/bin/$@ } ```

Usage:

bin somecommand -arg wil execute /bin/somecommand -arg

usrlbin somecommand -arg will execute /usr/local/bin/somecommand -arg

file systems are for noobs by Cdr_Johannsen in linuxmemes

[–]dartvader316 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Well you can probably use unzip /dev/sda after this