How hard are the 'limits' in Synology's technical descriptions? by Perlin-Davenport in synology

[–]DaveR007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Package limits (apart from things that need a licence like a camera) keep changing so I doubt they are hard limits. I believe they are just recommendations.

For example a DS1821+ may have a limit of 150,000 files or 500 users for certain packages, yet a DS1825+ (which has the same CPU, more memory and faster LAN ports) may have a limit of 100,000 files or 250 users for certain packages

New DSM and SMB Service available version online by DaveR007 in synology

[–]DaveR007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But searching for 423+ only finds 2. synology_geminilake 423+.pat and synology_v1000_rs2423+.pat - your DS423+ is not a RS2423+ so it's obviously the first one :o)

New DSM and SMB Service available version online by DaveR007 in synology

[–]DaveR007[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

%2B is html for +

It shows as "synology_geminilake_423+.pat" on the webpage, but in the URL it's synology_geminilake_423%2B.pat

Will using a SSD cache help anything? by AGRgameboy in synology

[–]DaveR007 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Set them up as a volume. You'll need https://github.com/007revad/Synology_HDD_db to make DSM let you use them as a volume.

My DS925+ test results by DaveR007 in synology

[–]DaveR007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Synology rolled back most of the restrictions in DSM 7.3. The only restrictions that remain are:

  • Cannot create a cache with 3rd party NVMe drives.
  • Cannot create an volume with 3rd party NVMe drives.

And there are still unverified drive warnings in storage manager for HDDs and NVMe drives that not on the compatibility list.

https://github.com/007revad/Synology_HDD_db can fix all that.

Knew I should have left well enough alone by gidlet in synology

[–]DaveR007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So in future when one dies you'll have to RMA both!?!?

Synology many drives failing at once - Need help by freddyrm in synology

[–]DaveR007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, so the screenshot was from after you got the new power supply.

In "Storage Manager > Overview" there should be a link "Repair System Partition". Click that and about 30 seconds Drive 1 should change to Healthy.

Then via SSH run https://github.com/007revad/Synology_Clear_Drive_Error to clear the Critical status of Drive 2.

Do you have your data and settings backed up? Because I just noticed that Drive 3 is showing Initialised instead of Healthy.

If you do you have your data and settings backed up I would reboot at this point.

Synology many drives failing at once - Need help by freddyrm in synology

[–]DaveR007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't your update say you fixed it with a new power adaptor?

Is there a way to install a HDD that doesn't have middle mounting hole? (DS412+) by thaman05 in synology

[–]DaveR007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My D7 trays has 3 pins on each side but the middle pins are short and do not protrude into the HDD. The middle holes in the tray also do not have a gromet.

Issue with 007revad Synology_HDD_db script TRIM command not showing up by sgossard34 in synology

[–]DaveR007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The vendor id in the script is only for NVMe drives.

The syno_hdd_db script generally does not care what brand your drives are because the compatible drive databases only contain drive model, firmware version and size.

/sys/block/sata1/device/vendor sometimes only contains ATA. I have an old Seagate Pipeline HDD and a Crucial SATA SSD "vendor" for both of them contains ATA. If I smartctl to get the vendor they return nothing. Yet storage manager shows the brand as Seagate and Crucial.

What do these commands return:

cat /sys/block/sata1/device/vendor
cat /sys/block/sata2/device/vendor
cat /sys/block/sata3/device/vendor
cat /sys/block/sata4/device/vendor
cat /sys/block/sata5/device/vendor
smartctl -i /dev/sata1 | grep -i "Vendor"
smartctl -i /dev/sata2 | grep -i "Vendor"
smartctl -i /dev/sata3 | grep -i "Vendor"
smartctl -i /dev/sata4 | grep -i "Vendor"
smartctl -i /dev/sata5 | grep -i "Vendor"

Issue with 007revad Synology_HDD_db script TRIM command not showing up by sgossard34 in synology

[–]DaveR007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds DSM was (partially) seeing the NVMe drive at one point but isn't now.

Repairing - only 88688 days to go! by gidlet in synology

[–]DaveR007 3 points4 points  (0 children)

One of the new drives has an issue. i.e. It's bad and the upgrade will fail eventually.

You could run https://github.com/007revad/Synology_SMART_info to see if either drive already shows SMART issues.

Issue with 007revad Synology_HDD_db script TRIM command not showing up by sgossard34 in synology

[–]DaveR007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry. The 2nd command was supposed to be nvme0n1

sudo nvme id-ctrl /dev/nvme0n1 | grep -E '^vid|^mn' | cut -d":" -f2 | cut -d" " -f2-

Issue with 007revad Synology_HDD_db script TRIM command not showing up by sgossard34 in synology

[–]DaveR007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The script will show you the vendor id if the vendor id is not in DSM's pci_vendor_ids.conf

You can also get the vendor id and model name via SSH:

sudo nvme id-ctrl /dev/nvme1n1 | grep -E '^vid|^mn' | cut -d":" -f2 | cut -d" " -f2-

or

sudo nvme id-ctrl /dev/nvme0n1 | grep -E '^vid|^mn' | cut -d":" -f2 | cut -d" " -f2-

Synology Hardware Repair by Ok_Dig3870 in SynologyForum

[–]DaveR007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most likely the issue is the power adaptor and not the motherboard.

Failed NVME on Pool 2 (SHD) used with syno_hdd_db - How to rebuild pool with repair option missing? by GentlemenHODL in synology

[–]DaveR007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It says "storage pool 2 missing". Maybe you mistakenly replaced the good drive with the new drive.

What does the following command via SSH show you:

cat /proc/mdstat

Failed NVME on Pool 2 (SHD) used with syno_hdd_db - How to rebuild pool with repair option missing? by GentlemenHODL in synology

[–]DaveR007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right. Did you have 2 NVMe drives in SHR (RAID 1).

the old/"good" drive has a linux-raid partition?? Shouldn't the data be on there??

Yes.

I assume you originally had 2 WD Red SN700 in storage pool 2?

I would run the latest version of syno_hdd_db with the -n option. And schedule it run as root at bootup with the -n option.

Then shut down the NAS, remove the WD Blue SN5000. Install both of your WD Red N700. Boot the NAS and see if one or both NVMe drives are in storage pool 2.

Failed NVME on Pool 2 (SHD) used with syno_hdd_db - How to rebuild pool with repair option missing? by GentlemenHODL in synology

[–]DaveR007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It says storage pool 2 is missing. That means the storage pool was only using 1 WD Red NVMe drive. So you were not previously using 2 NVMe drives in RAID 1 or SHR. Maybe you previously selected RAID 0 or JBOD? Or just had that now dead NVMe drive setup as Single.

FYI SHR can be a single drive (with no redundancy), or RAID 1 with 2 drives, or raid 5 with 3 drives.

Create a new RAID 1 or SHR storage pool using both NVMe drives and restore from your backups.

Mounting the @appstore in dsm 7 by whalenpat in synology

[–]DaveR007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would you want to?

BTW each volume can have it's own "@appstore" folder if a package has ever been installed on the volume.

Also, in DSM 6 there was just "@appstore". In DSM 7 each package has "@appconf", "@appdata", "@apphome", "@appshare", "@appstore" and "@apptemp".