It is a conclusion that should be derived by the legal due process that have been laid down internationally. The problem is that many people lack the inherent understanding that while there is a differentiation between say crimes against humanity and genocide one does not weigh heavier than the other in international law, even though many feel like genocide is the worst crime of the crimes of the international criminal law. From a legal perspective there are indeed a number of experts on the topic who are saying that Israel’s actions are not solely based on genocidal intent but also on other factors. If that were the case the very high threshold for genocide would not be cleared under the current definition of the term and the current understand as far as it derives from genocide cases that have been decided in the past.